My personal fav is waterdrop pictures>1/6 sec>f/16>ISO 800and that's how you always get a waterdrop pic[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelNEX-3Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)86 mmImage-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/5 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, Compulsory, Red-Eye ReduceFocal Length24.00 mmWhite BalanceAutoContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Photograph woman nude, or just photograph good looking women.It’s so obvious when I shoot landscapes and women the difference in reaction from people to the 2 things. I still keep doing landscapes because I like the outdoors but almost nobody will care about the photos lol
>>4368301Light painting is another, baiscally anything that can't be done on a smartphone easity. Or a good HDR photo, or sports photography on high burst mode where fractions of a second is the difference between a good shot and toast. A good portrait is another one as >>4368304 said. My highest rated photo is an action sports shot followed my female/models, followed by landscape.
>>4368301A beautiful 8x10 contact print using silver chloride paper and amidol developer impresses normies and photographers alike. :)
>>4368304>Photograph woman nude, or just photograph good looking women.>It’s so obvious when I shoot landscapes and women the difference in reaction from people to the 2 things. >I still keep doing landscapes because I like the outdoors but almost nobody will care about the photos lolblackpilled againit's all so tiresome bros
>>4368304>>4368657I like landscape photos but every time someone show me a portrait of a woman I think they are irremediable coomers
>>4368304NPCs are literally programmed to respond positively to women regardless of their own chromosomes and mental illness/normality. Monke like and protect baby maker. It's not just basically cheating, it is cheating.
>>4368301Long lens, perspective compression, nice bokeh that doesn't obliterate the background. Basically the most "thing that can't be done on a smartphone" type of shot.
>>4368301>1/6 secI don't get it. Should it be way faster than that?
>>4368301So this is the power of SNOY
>>4371157He used a flash. I don't know why he mentioned any of those parameters like it's some sort of secret code, they don't matter at all.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7RM3Camera SoftwareILCE-7RM3 v3.10Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)135 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:09:08 15:25:54White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating250Brightness4.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length135.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1920Image Height1281RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4371167It's also in the exif. I think OP mentioned it because of the length of the water drop. No fuckin' idea why you'd need ISO 800 with a flash at such short range though, even at f/16.
>>4371206The length of the drop is determined by the flash duration, which is determined by the flash strength. Aperture and ISO do have an effect on that but you could use any combination.>No fuckin' idea why you'd need ISO 800 with a flash at such short range though, even at f/16.He may have been able to lower the ISO and increased the flash power, however more power does mean a longer flash duration. Also the NEX-3 uses a tiny weak proprietary flash so it is going to have its limits.
>>4371213Huh, I always thought of flash as basically instantenous regardless of the flash power. I was under the impression that lowering the power was actually lowering the power, not lowering the duration of the flash.
>>4371221My understanding of how xenon flashes work (I haven't really looked into it that much) is that unlike an LED where you can vary the voltage to change the brightness you just feed them power and then they pulse at a certain brightness, like a mousetrap going off for a crappy analogy. However because it takes a little while for that flash to complete its pulse you can cut it off before it's finished.
>>4368301N00dz
