File: DSCN1984.jpg (3.04 MB, 4320x3240)

3.04 MB JPG

Did I bad?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	COOLPIX L24
Camera Software	COOLPIX L24 V1.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	37 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2011:02:12 07:04:56
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.1
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.72 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4320
Image Height	3240
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Color Mode	B & W
Image Quality	NORMAL
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-S
ISO Selection	AUTO
Image Adjustment	B & W
Lens Adapter	OFF
Auto Focus	Center
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Saturation	Normal
Noise Reduction	OFF

>>4370608
terrible photo but well done for taking pictures in the first place.

>>4370584
>yes goy, waste your time with editing every snapshit
>oh you dont want to? well, buy my preset pack.
>no, no, that's totally different from the camera jpg engine, just give me your shekels

>>4370613
>yes goy, waste your time with editing every snapshit
Yes goy, waste your money brandfagging for what the jpeg engine looks like instead of everything else the camera does

All camera jpeg engines have worse color quality and worse fine detail than processing the same raw in capture one, camera shadow gradation settings are fucking retarded, and i'd go back to film before I accepted having to care about a digital camera's white balance setting and how much AWB loves adding needless greengenta tints (for some reason, shooting daylight WB all the time looks fine on film, but dramatically discolored on every digital camera)

>>4370584
His pictures are terrible and he over relies on his awful presets

>>4370618
this is especially true for wormtrans, sony, and nikon

nikon Zs jpegs have detail and either really desaturated colors or really garish and unnatural colors compared to how the raws can turn out and let's not even talk about snoy and wormtrans

>>4370618
>just rent a $300/year software to make JPGs with different colors
consumerist cattle

>>4370618
>for some reason, shooting daylight WB all the time looks fine on film, but dramatically discolored on every digital camera)
this has to be bait

>>4370627
nikon Z jpgs are perfect

>>4370643
>buying software

>>4370643
>Spend $15 a month on editing software to get better photos
>NOOO! CATTLE! GOY! FAGGOT! I AM AUTOMATICALLY MAD AT YOU! YOU HAVE TO SPEND AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE AND STEAL SOFTWARE LIKE ME!
I know, you're an unemployed criminal, but i'm not ok?

>>4370684
>kvetching
hit a nerve

>>4370584
mite switch over to jpeg just to spite you

>>4370690
The nerve's constantly pressed on when surrounded by povvo-mindset trailer hicks who have been living in generational poverty so long they think spending $15 on nicer pictures is a cardinal sin and think it's more moral to steal software than pay people for their work, mate.

>>4370696
>and that's why you should buy fropack

>>4370697
No, every photo needs edited individually because digital is shit like that unlike film where every photo turns out good automatically.

>>4370584
>she doesn't shoot raw and jpg simultaneously
>her jpgs look like crap because she can't into setting up her camera
>she thinks anyone cares about anything besides the final result regardless of how it was acheived
ngmi

>>4370698
Do you scan your own film?

File: Screenshot from 2024-10-0(...).png (434 KB, 1305x1018)

434 KB PNG

>>4370618
>camera shadow gradation settings are fucking retarded
>he doesn't develop in-camera

File: sony color science .jpg (366 KB, 1012x2045)

366 KB JPG

>>4370584
>2024
>Manually editing every individual photo to fix your camera's color science

>>4370946
Yes, fuji users actually do that

Theres a bunch of darktable autism JUST for fixing fujis zombie skin

>>4370948
>Theres a bunch of darktable autism JUST for fixing fujis zombie skin
But enough about Sony

>>4370961
He's right. It's sad. Fuji users actually have to use a special raw processor just to fix xtrans zombie skin. With their nonexistent weather sealing its not like they'd spend that time outside lol.

At least it's not panasonic, shit colors no matter what you do, assuming your camera still has any battery power left after sitting for 1 day and the autofocus magically decides to work

>>4370964
>Being a color blind photographer
Lmao retard

File: 0ff278a6c332ecebaf6da671f(...).jpg (57 KB, 680x483)

57 KB JPG

>>4370584
Don't care, still shooting film.

Also, like another anon said, the reason he pushes RAW so hard is right there on his necklace. It's not a mystery.

i do be doing that

>>4370946
The Sony one makes no sense considering this Trump picture was taken on a Sony

>>4370968
>it's da joooos

RAW+JPEG
Wanna fight about it

>>4370926
i recognize that control panel
>still have to deal with horrible lolympus over sharpening

>>4370684
>>Spend $15 a month on editing software to get better photos
if you actually pay for adobe software you deserve to be swindled and it's pathetic that you'd actually admit to paying to shill for them

>>4371084
>RAW+JPEG
sure, why can't you make up your fucking mind and just choose one

>>4371091
What a weird thing to get mad about.

>>4371093
don't interrupt our fight namefaggot

>>4371093
SNOYboys are incredibly sensitive

>>4370584
>2024
>Not crying antisemitism in the DPReview articles about Gaza

>>4371091
RAW for archival, JPG to send it to the phone and publish to Insta. duh. fucking boomers living in the past where JPG was shit and you absolutely needed RAW to get any results. times have changed, grandpa
here's an editing tutorial for you, by a fellow boomer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWZeFp7bdsA

>>4371116
To be fair boomers either send the JPG as retards to their friends after tweaking the engine to 5+ saturation or edit the RAW extensively, good or bad, and then convert it to JPG and send the pic to their friends.
Youngling nigger faggots do the first step but add a random filter on their app and call it a day. You are no better than the oldfag that at least is stylistically consistent in his output.

>>4371120
if you get exposure and framing right in camera there is no need to edit 98% of your images. but getting exposure right seems to be very difficult for people who don't even know what the exposure meter meters for.

if you're some over-editing retard who changes around colors and "dodge&burn" areas, well, then editing is your hobby. but that's not photography.

>>4371126
>editing is your hobby. but that's not photography
Oh sorry, forgot all the greatest photographers weren't doing photography but hobby

>>4371139
Speak English, Pajeet

>>4371144
Take photos, faggot

>>4371145
>Confused redditor is also a jeet
lmao

>>4371146
Not gonna debate with a no-skills JPG kiddie, practice more and take some photos

>>4371148
>Snoycel giving advice
LOL

>>4371148
Neither of u guys were doing anything but shit slinging since the convo began.

>>4371069
every time

>>4370584
>dual record RAW and JPEG
>keep the RAWs for the best photos, keep the JPEGs for all the others

Uncompressed RAW only

File: DSCN2026.jpg (3.04 MB, 4320x3240)

3.04 MB JPG

>>4370612
awww but ty. I know the dumpster is not fully in frame some massive demerits on that.
Otherwise what makes it so trash?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	COOLPIX L24
Camera Software	COOLPIX L24 V1.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	37 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2011:02:12 13:56:16
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
F-Number	f/3.1
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	-1.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.72 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4320
Image Height	3240
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Color Mode	B & W
Image Quality	NORMAL
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-S
ISO Selection	AUTO
Image Adjustment	B & W
Lens Adapter	OFF
Auto Focus	Center
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Saturation	Normal
Noise Reduction	OFF

>>4370946
I never understood the snoy green tint.
Even my A7ii never had this issue?

>>4371983
I don't notice it either, but I have also heard its been changed in recent firmware updates. I think it was really only an issue on their earliest cameras like the first A7, but some memes just live forever.

>>4371983
>>4371987
It's was a very confused meme about how early sony cameras auto white balance would undercorrect the green tint in artificial light sources - for video, and video only.

Sony actually has a magenta tint in photos, the polar opposite, also similar to fuji color science. The only brand with a recurring green tint in stills is olympus.

>>4370584
It never even dawned on me to shoot jpeg in all these years, except recently I've realized I can have it save RAW+JPG and since both are managed as a single image in LR, the JPGs are actually handy as a sort of color grading baseline for reference so I don't get too into the weeds developing my Raws. More usefully thought, I like travelling with my oold smackity macbook pro 17" from 2011, with 16TB of drive space in it, but it can't read the RAWs from my new camera, so the JPG sidecars let me weed out my shoots using that computer, so I don't have to bring a second more expensive one out on the road in harms way. So that's actually been pretty useful.

>>4370618
>camera shadow gradation settings are fucking retarded
Why?

>>4371983
That's because it's a joke image made for people who spend thousands on camera gear and never go outside, instead living out their hobby by being a smartass about it's technical aspect online.

>>4370608
Garbage

>>4371983
snoy color science is the worst in the industry. They're still trying to fix it in every new model.

>>4370946
what does this have to do with raw? do you think your camera just switches to "objective truth colour mode" when you shoot raw?

>>4375629
Its the samefagging sony hate shill, just ignore it and remember…
>set s5ii down after turning it off because the autofocus has a 1% hit rate and it turns red things orange and white skin gray
>come back
>battery is dead
>pick up gh5
>shutter failure
>order nikon
>recalled before delivery, 4 month wait
>borrow a sony
>it fries when you breathe too close to the sensor
>fuck
>buy a fuji
>everything is worms until a misty day short circuits the electronics
>pick up an olympus to cope
>photos look like a phone and then one of the dials stops working shortly before the rear screen cuts out
CANON: The Only Good Cameras

>>4375631
what the fuck are you talking about? i shoot canon and this makes me want to switch brands

>>4375634
>i shoot the only good cameras
Based
>and realizing it makes me want to switch
k lol

>>4375635
no nigga you and your sickening antisocial personality makes me want to switch so im not associated with you

>>4375636
sorry sis but I’m not from wealthy white america. we dont coddle. we banter. our women are thicker skinned than you pyjama reddit boy.

>>4375631
Based funposter

>>4375636
>this shook by brand war bants
Lmao

>>4375639
>>4375640
samefags aftering getting btfo'd lmao

File: sony water damage.jpg (94 KB, 480x640)

94 KB JPG

>>4375631

>>4375696
Anon he already covered that this is what happens when you breathe too close to a SNOY garbage master (literally as unusable as panashit)

>>4370584
I want my t-short to say "I shoot JPEG"

>>4375726
Based

>>4375726
>he doesn't shoot tif
ngmi

File: Yes it's you.jpg (9 KB, 284x242)

9 KB JPG

>>4375777
>not shooting in Jpeg 2000

>>4375801
Do any camera's actually use jpeg 2000 though? There are old dslrs you can get which actually do have a tif file output

File: jpeg2000.png (31 KB, 824x366)

31 KB PNG

>>4375802
Not consoomer cameras, but it is a thing.

>be me in 2024
>went back to shooting CCD JPEG