all photographers are failed painters

lets start coping hard

>>4372998
Its the current year, photographers are now people who correctly saw that there was never any value in painting.
>ooooh i learned to hold my hand steady and draw a circle ooooh
Robot tier skill. In terms of geological time, painting was brought out to slaughter by AI shortly after it exited its infancy.

now photography exists solely on the basis that it is more likely to be real (c2pa soon, pls)

File: Fernand_Khnopff013.jpg (605 KB, 1195x1600)

605 KB JPG

>>4373001
>that there was never any value in painting.
define value
90% of visual trick in photography has their basis in painting

cope harder

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Photographer	Fernand Khnopff
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	41 dpi
Vertical Resolution	41 dpi
Image Created	2014:05:14 15:30:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1195
Image Height	1600

>>4373005
Inherent value to something being painted rather photographed.

There's actually none outside of ephemeral cultural memes. Im sure some cave paintings were once expensive to sleep under too, but now they're just scribbles on rock. Before painting could achieve more than photography, CGI took it out back and shot it. Sorry.

File: Gustav_Klimt.jpg (2.67 MB, 1415x1416)

2.67 MB JPG

>>4373015
art has no value. without art people would still survive. so please don't talk to me about """value""".
>Inherent value to something being painted rather photographed.
oh you mean manipulating people that what photographer with his manipulation tool that is camera has captured is real? kek.

>There's actually none outside of ephemeral cultural memes.
nobody gives a single shit about photography too beyond double tapping on instagram and then forgetting about it forever. people still attach some nobility to painting but photography is taken as disposable trash. millions of photographs post billions of their images for free every single day.

>>4373025
*millions of photographers

what are we discussing here exactly? that art is subjective? because it is.

>>4373025
Yeah well if art has no value because you can't eat it then why does a chocolate cake cost more money than a bag of rice retard....

>>4372986
I am French so I don't have this problem

>>4377766
luxury is not survival good sir. you can survive without a chocolate.

>>4377453
It isn't.

>>4378022
It is.

>>4378040
nta, but it isn't. Art has a strict definition and criteria. Whether or not you respond to Art in a resonate way is subjective.

>>4378093
Your post is art. Because of how elegantly retarded your opinion is and it's honestly a miracle you could even put it into words.

>>4372998
All painters are failed photographers. Probable because they shot Sony the first time they tried it.

>>4378093
>Art has a strict definition and criteria.
Which banana taped to wall fulfills kek

>>4373025
>without art people would still survive
Remove all art from the world and people would immediately start making art. It's in our nature, you cannot remove it