>>4374040
Do you want a DSLR and can get it for a good price? I'd look into the 6D as well if I were you. Both are great DSLR's.

>>4374040
I actually got a 5D Mk3 a few weeks ago and have been loving it. Id say the 5D Mk2 has slightly better colors sooc but the improvements with the ISO and autofocus makes up for it.

File: Resize_20241015_025715_5995.jpg (1.29 MB, 1920x2880)

1.29 MB JPG

>>4374042
A few photos ive taken with it

File: 1U6A1052.jpg (2.47 MB, 1920x2880)

2.47 MB JPG

>>4374043

File: Resize_20241015_034359_9345.jpg (1.08 MB, 2660x1838)

1.08 MB JPG

>>4374044

>>4374040
Do it.
Don't fall for the mirrorless meme.

File: 1U6A10971.jpg (1.94 MB, 2522x1892)

1.94 MB JPG

>>4374045

>>4374040
The 5D iii was the best DSLR ever made when it debuted. Loved mine before I downgraded to a 6D as I needed the EG-S focusing screen, just get it and don't look back.

>>4374043
>>4374044
>>4374045
>>4374047
Did you superimpose fake grain and CA on top of these pictures? Because respectfully, they look like utter fucking dogshit

>>4374065
>nophoto
Opinion discarded

>>4374065
they remind me of Leon's attempts to make the OM-5 film-like

>>4374065
>CA
No, thats real faggot. Lets see your photos now.

I know >color science is a controversial topic but there's something about the Mark II and III files that makes it really easy to work with the colors.

I've been using the 5D MK2 color profile on my Z50's shots and they're very pleasant, true to life, and neutral. Why aren't the Canon 5Ds as popular as the Nikon D800s or Sony A7s?

>>4374040
It's not worth it, and ML barely adds anything useful to the 5d3.
The only reason why you might buy one is that you're very short on money, already have EF lenses, and need great AF.
If you're not short on money buy a 5d4, if you don't already have EF lenses buy an R6 or whatever modern enough Sony or Nikon body, and if you don't need great AF buy a 6d.

File: 5E7A0736.jpg (2.82 MB, 3072x4608)

2.82 MB JPG

>>4374065
>>4374040
Pretty sure he did some sort of fuckery. I can post some other examples as well. :D

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.0.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3840
Image Height	5760
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:12:12 15:18:50
Exposure Bias	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Color Space Information	sRGB
Metering Mode	Pattern
Exposure Time	83/5000 sec
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown

File: Farm (1 of 5).jpg (2.2 MB, 2813x4220)

2.2 MB JPG

Here is one with the 70-200 f2.8 ii

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:29 13:03:29
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Farm (5 of 5).jpg (2.66 MB, 2560x3840)

2.66 MB JPG

>>4374299
May have cropped this one. Idk

Here is chicken for you. I think it's adequate, and you can definitely make nice big prints with it. The L lenses are pretty sweet and af is really good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:29 13:03:39
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	185.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4374245
>if you don't need great AF buy a 6d
When people talk about "good" AF in 2024 what do they mean? I thought 2010s DSLRs were fast and accurate. Is there something else which makes these next gen mirrorless better?
-Confused

File: 5E7A3102 (1).jpg (3.18 MB, 3072x4608)

3.18 MB JPG

More chicken. :D I've got goat pics if that would help also.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 10.0.0 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	3840
Image Height	5760
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:15 14:22:06
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	31/10000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/8.0
ISO Speed Rating	100
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4374305
In 2024 it means reliable subject detect with pdaf/cdaf hyrbid tech, because a lot mirrorless cameras basically rely on it (using it DSLR style with a single focus point in AF-C results in losing focus and hunting with most cameras)

DSLRs did not have decent shit-detect period until canon released the DPAF system, but they did have very fast AF in the OVF that was reasonably accurate within the limits of lens focus shift and calibration errors.

>>4374297
>>4374306
Sharpest photos you ever posted

Now in going to use your filename pattern to look up your post history on all boards!

>>4374315
jfc get a life incel

>>4374315
If you search 5e7a you just get a bunch of furry porn

mastermind troll

File: 1U6A1248-3.jpg (1.56 MB, 2832x1888)

1.56 MB JPG

>>4374297
Correct, I edit my photos to try and convey a certain sense of mood or feeling. I could care less about sharpness personally. I understand though that those photos probably werent good examples for OP of what the camera can do with minimal editing, my bad. Heres an example with much less editing.

>>4374315
Well, have fun with that. These are basically the only pics I've ever posted from my dslr. Maybe less than 10 others.

Also no one really cares about sharpness. Tonality, contrast, content are all way more important to the non-chart obsessed, especially when I'm scanning film or taking pictures of my prints. My contact prints look better than any image I've ever seen on a screen. :)

>>4374326
Yeah, they look pretty cool imo, but not really representative of quality of the camera.

File: 40keks.jpg (57 KB, 742x655)

57 KB JPG

>>4374315
>Plan doesn't work because we have to format our cards every time we cut files out to our PC
Kek. 40 Keks even.

>>4374348
Wasn't that a Sony problem? I've had my canonmera for ages and never experienced such things.

>>4374040
having this exact dilemma right now after seeing the prices for these things and the older L lenses. I lusted after the mkiii about a decade ago. what exactly is an a7 whatever going to offer me over this?

>>4374386
Yis this is Snoy specific and I was purely poking fun. Didn't look liek Canon filename so I just went with it anyway

>>4374305
Great AF always means fast and reliable, but some things are taken for granted in 2024, such as the ability to recognize faces and follow the focus object while it's moving around the frame.
In 2013 reflex cameras with accurate AF existed, but only a handful had the ability to switch between different AF points after the first selection, maybe even with obstacles hiding the subject for a moment, and a reliable system to focus on the actual subject rather than the tree to its left or the audience behind it.
That's the biggest and most significant advantage the 5d3 has over the 6d, so unless you need to shoot fast and erratically moving things the 5d3 is a waste of money imo.
What >>4374309 got wrong is that DSLRs exist with much more powerful AF systems than single point AF.

>>4374040
> Is 5D Mark III with ML worth getting in 2024? Purely for photography?
Works as well as it ever did. For the right price it’s still a great camera. Beware it does have poor DR by today’s standards.

>I had a 1200d and was fooled into upgrading to an M50, both have a shit-tier quality in low-light settings.
If you want God tier low light performance, R6.

>>4374315
Any results?

File: LREdit (1 of 1)-5.jpg (2.84 MB, 3072x3790)

2.84 MB JPG

>>4374514
Yes. Cute and cool pictures of my dog.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.1.1 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3072
Image Height	4608
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:01:19 18:33:53
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Program	Manual
Color Space Information	sRGB
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Metering Mode	Spot
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown
F-Number	f/11.0

File: 5E7A0917.jpg (3.2 MB, 4209x2945)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4374514
Check this one out too.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 10.0.1 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	5262
Image Height	3683
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:16 08:21:47
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Color Space Information	sRGB
White Balance	Auto
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	3/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/3.5
ISO Speed Rating	100
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Metering Mode	Pattern
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4374535
You just know the horrific shit that's been done to this dog when you look into it's eyes.

>>4374585
You just know the horrific shit this guy obsesses over when you look at his posts...

>>4374587
I know what you've done and it's disgusting. It's disgusting and you should be ashamed.

>>4374596
>thinks that being outspoken about animal abuse on this website towards proven dog abusers is disgusting.

Got bad news for you, guy...