>>4375751
I hate film so much you wouldn't beleive.

>>4375751
I love film so much if you don't believe it I'll just impale myself with this guy >>4375764
behind the shed on a friday night until I squirt his manbatter out my eyeballs. That much.

>>4375751
>5mm landscape kit than a nikon fe
Nikon FA. It really whips the llamas ass. And yeh that fucking Zeiss glass gets me sweaty. I mean god damn. GOD DAMN

File: A7R01775_F100Retro80s_13.jpg (892 KB, 2048x1378)

892 KB JPG

Snapshits in the yard with a new lense.
Points for guessing what it is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: A7R01776_F100Retro80s_14.jpg (645 KB, 1412x2048)

645 KB JPG

>>4375780
This shit is called Leucaena and it's almost impossible to kill. It sends down massive taproots and will happily re-sprout into a shrub and flower within a year of being hacked down to a bare stump and doused in glyphosate.
It's continuously covered in sap-suckers that shower you if you ever disturb it.
I hate it a lot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: A7R01779_F100Retro80s_17.jpg (825 KB, 1396x2048)

825 KB JPG

>>4375782
This on the other hand is capsicum, and it's very welcome in the garden.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

>>4375782
Sounds like something you deserve tbqhdesu. I feel despair over morning glory in my garden, but now I'm thankful it isn't your gay plant.

File: A7R01778_F100Retro80s_16.jpg (885 KB, 1435x2048)

885 KB JPG

>>4375783
I'm superior to Ed Weston in every way.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

>>4375788
Your peppers didn't make me cum. 0/10.

File: 000006.jpg (578 KB, 1818x1228)

578 KB JPG

i want to go get some film but it is still going up in price and i can NOT find expired locally anymore :(

>kodak gold 200 on zenit E with the jupiter 37A lens

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-511
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:19 12:52:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1818
Image Height	1228

File: 1700331445606188.jpg (2.9 MB, 5046x3400)

2.9 MB JPG

Posting the whole roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5116
Image Height	3438
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 15:30:11
Image Width	5116
Image Height	3438

File: 1728153840202873.jpg (2.13 MB, 2133x3269)

2.13 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2133
Image Height	3269
Horizontal Resolution	2400
Vertical Resolution	2400
Image Created	2024:05:29 22:21:31
Image Width	2133
Image Height	3269

File: 1709355076040743.jpg (3.95 MB, 4943x3366)

3.95 MB JPG

>Kentmere 100 on canon 40mm

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4943
Image Height	3366
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 15:34:45
Image Width	4943
Image Height	3366

File: 1699265602580713.jpg (3.67 MB, 5030x3366)

3.67 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 15:36:49
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366

File: 1711933873648742.jpg (1.72 MB, 4993x3360)

1.72 MB JPG

Missed focus on these 2. Dunno what happened.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 15:44:27
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366

File: 1715078330831276.jpg (3.24 MB, 5030x3366)

3.24 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 15:45:50
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366

File: 1699148805849811.jpg (2 MB, 4924x3323)

2 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:19:04
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366

File: 1721150403173866.jpg (3.48 MB, 5030x3366)

3.48 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:23:01
Image Width	5030
Image Height	3366

File: 1721272356959607.jpg (3.64 MB, 3384x5037)

3.64 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5037
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:28:14
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5037

File: 1722092342439474.jpg (4.08 MB, 5037x3384)

4.08 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:25:48
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384

File: 1711738155993199.jpg (2.02 MB, 4887x3318)

2.02 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:36:53
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384

File: 1721157129808328.jpg (2.11 MB, 4994x3381)

2.11 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:44:25
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384

File: 1725449914386316.jpg (3.28 MB, 5037x3384)

3.28 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 16:47:40
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384

File: 1716720072614876.jpg (2.69 MB, 5006x3381)

2.69 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:18:09
Image Width	5037
Image Height	3384

File: 1707479424688169.jpg (4.69 MB, 3384x5037)

4.69 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5037
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:30:04
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5037

File: 1716963862095861.jpg (2.24 MB, 5001x3381)

2.24 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:39:40
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1710979209903535.jpg (3.79 MB, 3384x5073)

3.79 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:43:01
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073

File: 1708336489055413.jpg (4.52 MB, 5073x3384)

4.52 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:44:37
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1707428515056904.jpg (2.45 MB, 2118x3279)

2.45 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2118
Image Height	3279
Horizontal Resolution	2400
Vertical Resolution	2400
Image Created	2024:03:24 23:37:22
Image Width	2118
Image Height	3279

File: 1702216326712330.jpg (2.55 MB, 5023x3381)

2.55 MB JPG

>>4375870
I was waiting for a runner to enter the frame but I pressed the shutter too early.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:48:00
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1727658391688779.jpg (4.34 MB, 5073x3384)

4.34 MB JPG

>>4375873
Couldn't get the timing right on these.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:49:29
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1717298912414172.jpg (3.95 MB, 5073x3384)

3.95 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:52:04
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1728900195010464.jpg (4.71 MB, 3384x5073)

4.71 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:54:51
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073

File: 1719398103022898.jpg (2.63 MB, 5055x3381)

2.63 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 18:58:11
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1711972088773790.jpg (2.98 MB, 5045x3381)

2.98 MB JPG

>>4375878
I just gave up on these last few frames and it was getting dark.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:00:44
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1702672820645872.jpg (1.84 MB, 3380x4952)

1.84 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:07:59
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073

File: 1698298376092941.jpg (2.41 MB, 4939x3381)

2.41 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:10:45
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1706450630761878.jpg (2.24 MB, 5033x3381)

2.24 MB JPG

Developed normally in D76

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:13:06
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1726237366921802.jpg (2.15 MB, 5061x3381)

2.15 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:16:50
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1716053100333402.jpg (2.84 MB, 5073x3384)

2.84 MB JPG

>>4375885
Could have cropped out the curb here but that would require me to stand at the middle of the road.
>File too large

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.32
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3600 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 23:53:25
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1723846990231011.jpg (3.7 MB, 5073x3384)

3.7 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:19:56
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1717701027633297.jpg (2.14 MB, 4161x2990)

2.14 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:21:45
Image Width	5073
Image Height	3384

File: 1726291164329955.jpg (3.52 MB, 3384x4984)

3.52 MB JPG

aaaaaand last.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	SilverFast 6.6.2r5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073
Horizontal Resolution	3600
Vertical Resolution	3600
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:37:22
Image Width	3384
Image Height	5073

the 3 frames omitted were blanks :/

>>4375894
stop jizzing on your negatives

>shot an entire roll of thoughtless snapshots

>>4375899
Well I am at THAT age. Can't help it sadly :( I even got pyu on the scanner.

>>4375900
I enjoyed shooting them :D

>>4375846
sure go ahead, if sharpness is bourgeois concept, selection of images maybe is one too?

>>4375903
Hyper based.

>>4375900
Every photo is a snapshot, nophoto

>>4375913
>the notphotog motto

>>4375916
>Photo posted [ ]
>Childish response [x]

>>4375913
>>4375917
>no photos attached to these posts
You don't get to claim other photos as anon, you need to include them with each post, notphotog.

File: agc3.jpg (876 KB, 1464x2232)

876 KB JPG

>>4375918
I'm not claiming any photos, but I'm also not bashing anyone's photos without the confidence to post my own. Continue to be a nophoto and be mad at others who enjoy the craft. Verification not required.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1464
Image Height	2232
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

>>4375918
>>4375917
Time for a photo battle. GO!

File: KARSKP16LAP222.jpg (2.46 MB, 1313x2000)

2.46 MB JPG

Once moar, Lapland.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:19 22:52:12
Image Width	6815
Image Height	10151

File: KARSKP16LAP223.jpg (2.56 MB, 2000x1343)

2.56 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 12:03:29
Image Width	10151
Image Height	6815

File: KARSKP16LAP224.jpg (3.03 MB, 2000x1323)

3.03 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 12:11:51
Image Width	10175
Image Height	6695

File: KARSKP16LAP226.jpg (2.45 MB, 2000x1308)

2.45 MB JPG

Sleep well, nophotos.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	44 dpi
Vertical Resolution	44 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 13:01:31
Image Width	10151
Image Height	6695

Does anyone with a Mamiya 7 know what happens if you run a roll through without one of the spools locked? From the unexposed side?

File: 1729437887900972.jpg (78 KB, 704x642)

78 KB JPG

>>4375860
How can you even tolerate the results from this scanner?
>green arrow: actual dust
>red arrow: actual image detail it decided to delete

>>4375975
I tried out the software that came with it. I'm using vuescan now and making minor adjustments in GIMP.

File: 1729437887900972.jpg (56 KB, 838x544)

56 KB JPG

>>4375975
continuing my rant
>>4375871
No gradation in dense highlights, it just piles up everything in an ugly midtone around its limit then jumps to burnt-out.
I'm sure these are terrible looking negs, but still this only looks this way because the scanner has run out of puff.

>>4375943
>nophotos

Better to be a nophoto than this.

>>4375979
lmao u mad

File: A7R01733_EOS300Tamron2830(...).jpg (4.56 MB, 3000x4340)

4.56 MB JPG

>>4375975
>>4375976
>>4375978
And for context, this is what an un-printably dense HP5 neg looks like when scanned with a camera.
Still looks like burnt toast, but it doesn't get that bronzing effect.
>fresh film
>fresh dev
>5 degrees too hot
>probably ran out of shutter speeds on that camera too

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

>>4375982
At a river? I take better photos swinging my camera bro. Learn to compose.

File: 1729439018957006.jpg (393 KB, 1852x1396)

393 KB JPG

>>4375878
but like what even actually the fuck is going on here?
>Equipment Make Plustek
>Camera Model OpticFilm 7200
>Camera Software SilverFast 6.6.2r5

>>4375988
probably a video billboard on a truck caught mid frame?

>>4375985
>>4375982
PHOTO BATTLE!

File: A7R01752.jpg (4.62 MB, 3290x4928)

4.62 MB JPG

>>4375900
>shot an entire roll of thoughtless snapshots
>>4375985
>I take better photos swinging my camera bro.
You know sometimes it's ok just to head out with a handheld camera and the intention to finish a roll in one hit?
It keeps your eye in, and keeps you feeling confident operating the camera, and sometimes you get something nice.
>doesn't mean you have to post all of them
>doesn't give you the right to cry when people call them shitty

Also, I did post this image in the last thread, but I meant to add that I took it specifically for you /p/, and also blasted the whole roll in 24hrs

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: 1727419855915651.jpg (2.64 MB, 5136x3413)

2.64 MB JPG

>>4375988
Software issue. Thanks for pointing it out anon. I would have sold this shitty scanner to get a macro lens if not for that.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.32
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	882 dpi
Vertical Resolution	882 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:21 06:01:35
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4375989
You’re shockingly dumb.

>>4375985
lol u REALLY mad

>>4375992
>>doesn't mean you have to post all of them
>>doesn't give you the right to cry when people call them shitty

>WTF NOOOO YOU CANT JUST USE FILM LIKE THAT A STARVING AFRICAN CHILD COULD HAVE TAKEN GREAT PHOTOS ON THAT!!

File: IMG_9905.jpg (25 KB, 259x194)

25 KB JPG

>>4376015
I gotcha famm

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	259
Image Height	194
Scene Capture Type	Standard

I think this thread so far is raising an interesting question.
Should you go out and take photos in bad light?
If it’s the only time you have that week you kind of have to but I think it’s better to work on your schedule so you can fit it in when the light is nice.
I think a lot of the photos so far would be nicer either golden hour or when the sun it out or around dusk etc.
During the day heavy cloud is just so flat.

File: 20241020_0001.jpg (2.38 MB, 5930x6033)

2.38 MB JPG

He has covered wars, you know

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:58:15
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5930
Image Height	6033
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20241020_0002.jpg (1.94 MB, 5951x5207)

1.94 MB JPG

>>4376061
2 MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:00:52
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5951
Image Height	5207
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4376055
Nice light is just a crutch for talentless snapshitters and boomers.

>>4376063
>>4376061
>an m43 user posting actual photography
>theyre also a darktable user
WHAT

The end times cometh

File: 20241020_0010.jpg (1.99 MB, 5812x5475)

1.99 MB JPG

>>4376085
weirder things must have happen, right?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:07:25
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5812
Image Height	5475
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>banned from /sp/ because I said I would drink a shot of fixer if dubs

Fuck this site man

File: 1698365925978289.jpg (1.8 MB, 3130x2075)

1.8 MB JPG

babbys are hard to photograph

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3130
Image Height	2075

I'm too drunk but I see some good pics here

>>4376102
very wiggly subjects indeed

>>4376119
>Shutter speed: 1/16000th
THERE'S STILL FUCKING MOTION BLUR!?

>>4376095
Did you get dubs?

File: 3A_0951.jpg (2.05 MB, 2000x3000)

2.05 MB JPG

First roll back. Pretty happy with how this looks all things considered. Wishing I had a film stock that had a bit more color for the buildings, but it was a portra 400 kinda day.

File: 000062 (1).jpg (4.61 MB, 5397x3602)

4.61 MB JPG

>>4375780
Greetings

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP500
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-2.0-0E-350
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:01:17 07:55:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5397
Image Height	3602

File: 000066~2.jpg (2.73 MB, 2699x3602)

2.73 MB JPG

>>4376173

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SP500
Camera Software	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-2.0-0E-350
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2699
Image Height	3602
Image Created	2024:10:21 20:34:46
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Height	3602
Image Width	5397
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4375860
>>4375975
>automated dust removal without ICE
ICE not working for b&w aside, what's even the point?
it's going to get more wrong than right, especially if it's onboard the scanner and not using modern AI algos
on top of that the "healing" is just a masked blur
is this specifically the OpticFilm, or a Silverfast thing?

File: 1715745802633543.jpg (3 MB, 5024x3428)

3 MB JPG

>>4376229
silverfast software being too dated or just me being retarded

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 7200
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.32
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	863 dpi
Vertical Resolution	863 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:21 21:53:49
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 0adsrtaa.jpg (3.58 MB, 3912x7979)

3.58 MB JPG

>>4375873
>>4375874
you were trying to copy Bresson's cyclist photo but you don't realize his photo works not because of the cyclist, but because of the composition
>>4375865
even if this wasn't shaky as hell, what are you shooting? what is it about?
what is ANY of these about?
all of them seem hasty and thoughtless
it feels like none of them matter even to you, like if you enjoyed putting a camera on your face and pressing a button as an end in itself, as if the resulting photos were almost like a collateral of your button pressing experience
and this thoughtlessness seems to permeate every step of your "workflow", which seems to be pressing button on camera 36 times > sending roll to lab > getting jpgs from them > dumping them all on this thread

>>4375878
>>4375994
this is proof you didn't even glance at your photos before posting them all here
the first thing I noticed was the horrible central point the image
if not even you would take the time to look at your photos, why would we?
>>4375879
you didn't even notice there's something awfully wrong with these cables?

curating is a crucial part of photography
you didn't even look at your photos
you clearly didn't edit them either
you didn't compose any of them properly, none of them are particularly interesting, none of the subjects matter
it's a whole lot of nothing
good thing you had fun shooting, but it doesn't mean they're any good

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:26 12:29:15
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4376389
>all of that mental diarrhea
>post a photo of a corner building

>>4376393
>can't argue any of the points made
>"hurr but but but building corner!"

File: Untitled (34)-3.jpg (3.62 MB, 3471x2816)

3.62 MB JPG

My first still life with the 8x10. Hopefully you can see that I attempted to make a thoughtful arrangement of the various elements even if this isn't your cup of tea.

If you had any constructive feed back on composition, lighting, and general aesthetic that would be appreciated.

This image is just me sort of winging it as a first attempt to see what I get when I'm holding a print in my hand. Gotta start somewhere!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:21 18:03:16
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: moth.jpg (1.13 MB, 2858x1901)

1.13 MB JPG

>>4374962
>>4374978
the saga continues. I brought the bellows, 50mm lens, and tripod to the park over the weekend. ultimately the tripod was just dead weight, as all of the shots I took were handheld. I am quite happy with these shots as first attempts, though I already know a few places to improve (including getting a much faster to manipulate tripod if I can find one)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2858
Image Height	1901
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

File: dragonfly.jpg (801 KB, 2858x1901)

801 KB JPG

>>4376500
this particular dragonfly was quite a wonderful subject, sitting patiently on several sunny rocks and leaves as I crawled up to it and got shots. I got quite a few looks and questions about both the camera and the whole... being a grown man with my ass in the air trying to photograph a bug

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2858
Image Height	1901
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

bit of a newfag question but what lab do you guys use for development? Been really enjoying shooting on 35mm and testing out different labs across the US but wondering if you all have any recs?

File: bee.jpg (909 KB, 2858x1901)

909 KB JPG

>>4376503

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2858
Image Height	1901
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

File: fly.jpg (1.13 MB, 2858x1901)

1.13 MB JPG

>>4376505
this one was taken with a 100mm lens and the bellows. now that i've gotten used to the ungainliness a bit the setup is actually fairly usable. with the 100mm lens especially I only need to stop down about 1&1/3rd for the extended bellows and on a bright sunny day that means I can shoot at f/8-11 1/500 which helps both freeze motion and the camera's movement.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2858
Image Height	1901
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

File: floating bananas.jpg (1.09 MB, 2858x1901)

1.09 MB JPG

>>4376506
the biggest issue really is target acquisition (making sure the lens is centered on the subject), and followed closely by focus finding (and threading the needle between in too close and too far). with the 100mm's higher potential dof and being designed for macro its a bit easier, but the 50mm on the bellows is extremely narrow even a higher apertures

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Applied Graphics Technologies
Camera Model	Digital Link
Camera Software	Digital Link TIFF Conversion, Version 1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2858
Image Height	1901
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

>>4376504
Any "lab" should complete a known process to established specifications.
Outside of having totally unacceptable quality control/hygiene/cost/lead time/location.
Paying some hipster trustfund baby a premium just because of the quality of their insta feed is retarded if a cheaper local alternative exists.
Another variable comes in though if you're the kind of retard that doesn't scan their own film. I that case you're probably better off just sticking to digital.

File: [2] Ektar 100-Pano_nobord(...).jpg (3.9 MB, 5587x5546)

3.9 MB JPG

>>4376494
this looks very nice in terms of execution
I think the chayote is overexposed in its brightest reflection spots, and looks a bit too bright overall
I love how black the background is, the whites are very bright and the greys are very pleasant
it's very nice how large format gives such detail on the wooden blocks, the ring lines are beautiful
aesthetically speaking, it looks like a very well done study
the farthermost wooden block (the one right behind the bottle) looks misplaced, it's too tall and it feels like it doesn't belong there
the blurred shadow cast upon it is distracting (and somehow annoys me, I can't quite explain)
I feel like it would be better it the block were still there but way lower, like 1cm lower than the wooden block to the right, framing the bottle, it would be great – and the chayote's tendrils would stand out more, just a very white and bright, delicate, organic shape over the solid black background
it would feel more balanced too
and there wouldn't be that little distracting shadow near the top of the left wood
even if you chose to keep the back plank there, it would be nice to have it just a tiny bit further just so you don't have that shadow
the physalises' veiny leaves are beautiful, and I like how they're placed, and how there's a closed one resembling a tiny pumpkin and one coming through the leaves
the cobwebs are very nice too
as a suggestion of something I'd have there as well, I'd say some mushrooms would be nice
their textures tend to be intricate and fluid, I think it would go along very well
that's it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:10 17:09:50
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4376513
With the scanning are there any scanners you recommend, only recently got into film and been debating on pulling the trigger on a scanner? I have seen a lot of debate between film scanners and flatbeds around in my research.

>>4376508
These are a good effort, but none of them are sharp photos.
You really should make a bigger effort to use the tripod and smaller apertures.
One of the biggest things you can do to make tripod use easier for macro, especially at high magnifications, is to use a mounting system that lets you slide the whole camera forward and back.
The right way to use bellows in the field is really to set the bellows length for your desired magnification, and focus by moving the camera in or out, and a macro rail or even a long arca swiss plate are handy for that.
When you have a flash power dialed in for that magnification as well (fixed flash to subject distance) you can work very quickly.

>>4376514
>>4376494
>doghair & cidade de homos meet again
>they immediately proceed to gay intercourse

>>4376524
Almost anything it's possible for you to buy will be an improvement over a lab scan in technical quality, and put control over colour and contrast back in your hands.
The gold standard for quality though is camera scanning using a good macro lense.
If that would be your ultimate goal then I'd advise you not to overcapitalise on an intermediate step, and either go straight for that kind of setup, or for the cheapest film toaster/shatbed with film holders readily available.

File: a54aer6a45r.jpg (4.88 MB, 3750x3088)

4.88 MB JPG

>>4376503
dragonflies are some of the coolest animals
motherfucker looks like a military-grade insect from the 80's
this is peak animal design
and it's impossible to see them standing still, kudos for that as well
nice photo
>>4376537
this you? >>4376393
>complaining about pretty much the only person itt who gives feedback a bit more complex than "that's nice", "that's shit" or "kys"
to be fair, that's understandable coming from a nophoto

>>4376514
Thank you very much for the thoughtful feedback! I missed some hanging cord in one of the corners of course, so I'm going to retake the picture and take into account some of your feedback. I agree about that blurry shadow now that I look at it. Next time I'll post a picture of a contact print to keep things somewhat interesting, and share how good my exposure actually was or not...

If you can believe it this image was taken at f64 using a 300mm lens, 22 sec exposure! If you pixel peep the full res tiff there is some softness due to diffraction, but it's not really noticeable at an 8x10 print size, and completely unnoticeable when scaled down to 3.5mb jpg.

>>4376524
>>4376542
>will be an improvement over a lab scan in technical quality
labs have scanners ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars, operated by technicians of questionable skill
that's why you get shitty (worse, inconsistently shitty) results
you're basically telling anon to do the same thing but with cheaper equipment and less experience, and to expect better results
not that I'm disagreeing that people should do their own scans, but your reasoning is bullshit
>The gold standard for quality though is camera scanning using a good macro lense
sure if you mean gold standard for being easiest to set up, generally the cheapest, and giving reasonably good results with little effort
if you mean for quality lmao no but at least it's miles better than a flatbed
>>4376524
don't get a flatbed unless you're shooting LF
even for the best film-oriented flatbeds out there the IQ is poor at best and only recommended for LF because the other dedicated scanner options for film that large start in the 10s of thousands USD
either scan with a camera, or buy a coolscan 5000 (assuming you only need 35mm)

>>4376524
You can in theory at least (but it's a lot of work and easy to fuck up) get better technical image quality of scans with a DSLR/Mirrorless scanning rig. These can cost a lot if you don't have all the bits lying around already.

stuff like plustek outresolves flatbeds like the v600/v700/v800 for 35mm but it's slow.

Flatbeds like v600/v700/v800 give relatively low resolution out of 35mm film compared to the alternatives but are quick and convenient and good enough for social media that will be seen on phone screens. Once you get up to medium and large format they are getting enough detail out to make reasonable sized prints.

>>4376761
>but it's a lot of work and easy to fuck up
>tripod, extension rings, a led panel and 3d print the holders

its not rocket science m8

can someone asspill me on rolleiflexes? been thinken about getting info medium format

>>4376887
The 2.8 planar is a killer lens, the less "legendary" lenses are also great and they are very fun to use handheld/walking around because they're relatively compact and don't have a giant mirror that adds motion blur to all your pictures.

File: sge4htrs5jsr13.jpg (3.81 MB, 5590x5549)

3.81 MB JPG

>>4376887
this >>4376890
also the square format makes you think of composition in a very novel and particular way
square format can make portraits feel very balanced, landscapes be solid, street can be also very dynamic etc.
TLRs are also very discrete, despite feeling a bit big. But they're pretty much the same size as a regular 35mm SLR with a 50mm, and not putting it in front of your face makes them very unnoticeable

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:22 18:05:02
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20241020_0006.jpg (2.33 MB, 6005x6183)

2.33 MB JPG

>>4376897
>TLRs are also very discrete, despite feeling a bit big

And people tend to react more positive to them!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:04:15
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6005
Image Height	6183
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>last week found a bellows + camera body + lens set for 25 dollars, in 99% working order (oh no the ttl light meter from 50 years ago doesn't work)
>today picked up a 28-210 zoom + macro vivitar for $25, looking through it appears blemishless and the only "issue" is a missing lenscap (and the heft of the damn thing)
you are picking up interesting and cheap stuff for your vintage systems on craigslist, right /fgt/?

>>4376901
God I wish, everyone here has the attitude of "I know what I got" so fuck me, buying shit from ebay its actually cheaper

File: hsd4ngh6adhzga.jpg (4.87 MB, 3500x3357)

4.87 MB JPG

>>4376900
>noice contrast
also many people don't even recognize them as cameras, or at least not at first glance, and operating them is the type of action that just blends in (unlike putting an old camera directly in front of your face)

File: 2021-01-10-5b77fa29-ac48-(...).jpg (78 KB, 924x571)

78 KB JPG

>Pretty sure I just scratched an entire roll because I went too hard with the squeegee

>>4376915
The Film Developing Cook Book says never use a squeegee (or even your fingers to squeegee) but to use a finger on one side of the film to push the water off, then the other, to limit scratches

>>4376905
good moment. the drummer, the mother and her child especially

>>4376887
TLRs are awesome, but Rolleiflexes are pretty expensive for what you get. Unless you've got a ton of money laying around, I'd recommend a Yashicamat or Autocord. Most TLRs are pushing 60+ years old, so they'll probably need some TLC before they're ready to go.

File: 1728239293316250.png (349 KB, 3168x3080)

349 KB PNG

I just grabbed a Canon 1V for $750 shipped. With a roll of count 82, the HS and normal battery grips. I am excited.

>>4377013
Based 1V bro. Awesome deal. What lenses do you have to use with it? It's a god tier camera.

My advice is to get a 10 pack of cheap film so you can use the 11fps! You'll burn through rolls incredibly fast with the snappy AF + fast auto winding.

>>4377018
>My advice is to get a 10 pack of cheap film so you can use the 11fps!
I don't shoot anything that will need the FPS, but I'm tempted to go find something to try it once just to see it.

>What lenses do you have to use with it?
Nothing amazing. My 5d came with the Canon 28-105 . But I also have the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, which I actually really like. I'm going to save up and grab a stabilized 24-105 next.

File: Image 47 (1) (1) (1).jpg (4.04 MB, 2907x4129)

4.04 MB JPG

>>4377025
Yeah, you gotta try it a few times. It's really cool, especially with the AI servo AF. I prefer the shutter sound without the grip, but they both sound pretty good. You can shoot much faster with the grip, and I like having the controls and shutter button on the grip when shooting vertical. Very convenient.

Digital-era L lenses look great when used with film. Awesomely sharp and the AF is just insanely fast.

I will suggest reading the manual over so you can understand all the features and customization you'll get.

Pic was with a 70-200 f2.8 ii and probably 50D with a bit of sharpening applied. Sorry it's so dirty.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 10.0.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2937
Image Height	4273
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:22 22:44:59
Color Space Information	sRGB
Flash	No Flash
Light Source	Unknown

File: [24].jpg (3.67 MB, 2721x3848)

3.67 MB JPG

>friend of mine was moving abroad
>gave me some old film cameras and a couple rolls of film
>they were his girlfriend's uncle's
>friend said he only ever used one of them and it came out with double exposures on every frame
>they were all test photos of shit like computer screens and cigarrettes in ashtrays
>old computer screens and cigarrettes plastered over all of friend's vacation photos
>he warned me of this
>used one of those films once
>picrel is from one of the T-Max 400s
>some patterns from funguses or maybe electrostatic discharges [?]
>only used it for testing cameras and unimportant stuff
>some 3 or 4 rolls shot
>never had a problem other than the occasional fungus/electrostatic pattern
>used one on my new FM2 after having the shutter curtains completely fucked by the motordrive to test and see if everything was working fine
>stick T-Max 400 in it
>eager to use the FM2 again
>took some really lovely pictures of a type of tree that I love, it was completely loaded with flowers
>the day after, feel something weird when shooting
>mirror got stuck
>still covered by warranty, so it's back at the repair shop (at least I'm not paying)
>take roll out midway through, put it in other camera and finish it
>be today
>just developed it with Rodinal
>turns out it was a test roll from friend's uncle
>all black roll
>completely exposed to light
>only a small strip on the tip was clear, unexposed (from the part closest to the canister)
>the trees I like are not blooming anymore
i'm bummed :/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	--
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	0
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
White Balance	Auto

how's the minolta scanners? specifically the 5400 elite II

>>4377082
there is a minoltafag lurking here
on paper its a good scanner
>ice
>auto focus
>good resolution
>effective density range is acceptable
only thing it lacks is a way to do batch scans

>>4376551
>>4376551

Not him but the Brazilian dude that can't develop Ektar or color correct is a self absorbed asshole. I remember he gave me some critique I didn't read and then sperged out when he saw I posted my photo elsewhere. He thought he mattered that much where I posted my photo elsewhere to get the feedback I wanted instead of his """""honest""""" critique when in reality I never even paid attention to what he said to begin with. I only noticed he said something after he reposted my photo thinking it was about him not giving me the validation I wanted when in reality I didn't even know about his shit take.

File: a4sgf4as6d8f46.png (2 KB, 189x74)

2 KB PNG

>>4377224
>Not him but the Brazilian dude that can't develop Ektar or color correct is a self absorbed asshole
I'm him, faggot. I'm the Brazilian dude lmao
>I remember he gave me some critique I didn't read and then sperged out when he saw I posted my photo elsewhere.
never did that, the fuck you on about?
>I only noticed he said something after he reposted my photo thinking it was about him not giving me the validation I wanted when in reality I didn't even know about his shit take.
I've never posted anyone else's photo
so you're either lying with that vague ass story, or you're mistaking me for someone else

>>4377236

Oh my bad, confused you with someone else then.

>>I'm him, faggot.

Yeah, I may have had the wrong person but you're still a faggot. L2Dev

File: [14] Ektar 100 - 120_med.jpg (4.84 MB, 3160x4580)

4.84 MB JPG

>>4377264
we're all faggots, just different flavors
here's some Ektar [?]
why do you say it's badly developed?
looks fine to me

>>4376514
Good, it seems you learned since:
>>4377267

>>4377270

at least it's better than his self portrait

File: Image 69 (10).jpg (1.45 MB, 1867x1461)

1.45 MB JPG

A couple chick pics I took a while ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:23 19:27:04
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Image 69 (6)-2.jpg (979 KB, 1358x1049)

979 KB JPG

>>4377414
2/2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:23 19:29:48
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4377415
>>4377414
>behold the power of the shatbed
Just scan on your 5d. Sigma makes a very sharp 70mm macro for EF.

Camera scanning processes frames 100x faster and way better looking. A flatbed can not even extract 1/4 of medium formats resolution at its finest detail setting, and on 35mm it's even worse.

>>4377418
I'm not sure why these 4x5 scans downscaled so much when I exported them as jpegs from lightroom. I tried once to fix it but got lazy.

I'm way too lazy to stitch 4x5 from a FF scan and 22mp 5dm3 only produces results that are marginally better than my shitbed with 35mm...

They're pretty sharp in full res, and I posted more for content. These were fairly challenging shots to take using flashes and I think these 2 are pretty cool.