[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


New anti-spam measures have been applied to all boards.

Please see the Frequently Asked Questions page for details.

[Advertise on 4chan]


How come the 5D IV sample is so much more softer than the R6 II?
Is it just that the RF 85mm is so much sharper than the EF 85mm?
Why wasn't dpreview using EF L series lenses?

There are also some weird artifacts on the R6 II dpreview samples.
>>
who fucking cares
>>
>>4376242
Clearly OP does
>>
>>4376179
because this photo was taken 15 fucking years ago and rotational velocidensity has rotted the bits in the file, reducing sharpness.
because the 85L was even softer stopped down
because practical system sharpness using normal first party lenses is more important than theoretical maximums attainable only in lab conditions with reference grade opticks
see also >>4376242
>>
>>4376255
>rotational velocidensity
Oh no, not this /mu/ meme again...
>>
>>4376179
Dpreview fucks most of these up and has been caught missing focus and fudging the exposure or using shit lenses and neglecting mirror lockup
>>
>>4376179
Because all SLR cameras soften their own photos with the vibrations of the mirror mechanism unless you temporarily forego using the viewfinder and shoot in MUP or live view mode, and the dpreview intern shooting the 5div probably forgot to do everything right for ultimate sharpness just like they sometimes accidentally underexpose or overexpose cameras and throw their test scene way off almost like they're purposefully trying to make some models look better or worse
>>
>>4376320
this is the source of the “soft natural” look autists ascribe to dslrs htw

because they all have mild visual impairment from computer use and think the world is actually that blurry
>>
>>4376283
so the fact that the K-1 is so much sharper than the 5D IV is because they've deliberately skewed the results?
Is there any other review site where I can directly compare cameras without one using one of the sharpest lenses ever made (77 limited) and the other using a normal consumer grade lens?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.