OH NO not AGAIN Sony bros... how can we ever recover from this?
sony still makes the best cameras in the market
>>4377084The same way the Toyota Corolla is the best car in the world yea?
>>4377098extremely durable and will last a lifetime, yes
>>4377101>You've activated my trap card.Which is a matter of perception because they were made in millions upon millions so even if half of them got sent to the landfill, you're still gonna see a majority share.
>>4377077The rubber looks almost as hard as the plastic
>>4377108>ifbut they wont
>>4377077WTF i just checked my Sony's memory card compartment and touched that part and it easily scratches off. Its not even a year old what the hell Sony?
>>4377111They actively are though.
>>4377077Autistic child picks at his rubber gaskets more at 11My camera works fine because i dont try and pick off the rubber>>4377108They are made by the millions, so its inevitable that we get posts like>my a7iv’s shutter mysteriously died>photo shows a poorly removed finger grease mark and dent from some kind of tool like they were trying to clean the shutter with it in dust cover mode>the door gasket came off in fingernail sized increments>i dropped it in the ocean weather sealing no workMeanwhile /p/ is dead quiet about panasonic and fuji’s equal number of faiures and problems despite having not even 1/4 of the market share :^) i wonder why that could be? Why does no one mention the high rate of gfx100s shutter failure or s5iis eating their batteries while off? Weird! Its all “this snoy broke questionably” “panasonic made a new camera snoy will surely die”
>>4377130/p/ also didnt mention the hordes of defective r5iis lmao but remember we have an actual canon shill who begs people to buy refurbished r50 kits
This is either a warranty problem or fingernail problem. Anyways, obligatory snoy[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2268Image Height4032Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4377077>$3k camera falling apart after a monthOhnonononono!
>>4377137>people pick at the seals of their $3k camera>post on dpreview with 8 months left on the warrantyweird! why not file a warranty claim? why keep an eye on it instead of sending it back? maybe the keratin chunks embedded in the rubber would be a bad lookop you forgot to drop your /v/ mannerisms btw[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height720Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4377077>intentionally damages his camera>goes on 4channel to complain about his damaged cameraNTMA
lmao @ snoycels picking at their weather sealing and lusting after the authentic falling apart on launch experience of superior canon[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1013Image Height810Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4377077So this is the power of snoy
>>4377339you forgot to drop your /v/ mannerisms again op
>>4377077I'm guessing obese fingers resulted in a fingernail tearing into that gasket.
>>4377342Yeah. At 4 months the camera is in warranty. Warranty repairs get sent in. Not complained about and kept an eye on, as the dpreview posters are doing.This is either user damage or a warranty repair. And they arent expecting sony to fix it now are they?
>all camera brands offshore manufacturing to China and Thailand>new cameras are progressively more expensive>new cameras are progressively more poorly built>new cameras have progressively worse ergonomics>new cameras only offer more megapixels and more cinema video features that nobody will use "Oh boy 6K open gate ProRes RAW blahblahblah" do you work in Hollywood or what?
>>4377345mirrorless has been a scam from the start.
>>4377346My a7c STILL works fine. Enjoy your blob. Dont forget to keep your fingernails off the door gaskets. I know I do!
>>4377347>My a7c STILL works fine against all oddsftfy
>>4377348What odds? 3 broken cameras that were dropped in the ocean, prodded at with closed shutters, or picked at by fat tards with claws?Thats what you can muster against the cameras that outsell nikon, panasonic, fuji, and olympus combined? Huge numbers means a 0.00001% failure rate equals tons of dead cameras, and yet… Yeah a7c til i die lmao
>>4377351well there was also the a7riii that only fails WR tests when it goes near an olympus and a mysteriously richer reviewer and matches the om1 in toneh’s freeze tests and lasts hours in the rain otherwise
>>4377077Why do Sony cameras fall apart so easily bros?
>>4377353hey op, try not talking like a /v/irgin if you want to samefag
>>4377354>oh no no no bros its over thingsisters so this is the power of thing sisters weve been mogged by stuffcels its over thischads thatcels have us cornered blackpilled againWhy does every sexless dysgenic talk like this
>>4377131Everyone got bored after Canon fell flat on its face with the overheating issue when they launched tgeir first mirrorless flagships and never recovered since.Also nice whataboutism, too bad it doesn't excuse the shit Sony is pulling.
>>4377362except you gotta make up half the shit. the only part thats real is a few firmware mishaps that never affected intelligent peoplw.
>>4377368>real issue>no no no only the DUMBS fell for that one its perfectly excuseable
>>4377130>more cope at 11
>>4377353It's the power of SNOY[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiCommentScreenshotImage Width1200Image Height1284
>noooo sony totally fixed their weather sea...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution144 dpiVertical Resolution144 dpiImage Width1302Image Height1328
>>4377391https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmrjI0-9KJshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ijs-VjQ-hJ0FYI, no weather sealing actually works, and if enough people try it, it will fail on some cameras. It's not waterproofing. It just delays issues at best.https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4198695https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4542344https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/197k3r8/anyone_experienced_problems_with_the_om_system/>>4377390sony sources all of their shutters from nidec copal. they don't make their own. it was a bad batch, similar to the issues with pentax aperture actuators (a similar lawsuit that failed, but one that's rarely mentioned because this incel board only hates sony. sony is associated with handsome chads and success of course.)
So what exactly prompts someone to spam the same half dozen broken cameras (out of millions of non broken ones) just because of the brand?You could easily do the same thing with article titles about the Z6. Z7, Z8, and Z9 recalls or broken nikons, nikons with canted EVFs, nikon 50mm focus motor noise variation, and all sorts of shit, buggy canons on firmware v1...Why sony specifically, why all day, why all night, why seven days a week, and why only on /p/?I remember we had another version of this autist spamming broken fujifilms before. Is it the same fucking guy? He also hated sony (and leica) because they were associated with "the jews" or something. Is Leica his next target? Is he going to spam broken leicas next month?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.34Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:07:16 14:40:26
>>4377409because they make the best cameras, and that makes fanboys of other brands feel a need to try and stop people from buying them so nikon and panasonic dont lose any more customers
>>4377345>snoy consoomers: ...and thats a good thing!
>>4377409Yeah its irritatingAnd leica probably is his next bitchfest. They have some real problems, like majority of the product line problems not six out of 1 million problems.
>>4377409Like most things on 4chan, it's autism. The same thing happens with car makes on /o/ and OSes on /g/. Nobody in real life or in a professional setting gives a shit about this kind of thing.
>>4377409
>>4378143Photogs have forgotten how to focus and that's a bad thing
>>4377405>but muh youtubers!https://www.imaging-resource.com/articles/2017-weather-testing-nikon-d850-vs-sony-a7riii-canon-5div-olympus-e-m1IIBut at least you've got color science going for you, right?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4378131The green tint only tracks if you wrote “made by micro four thirds” on it to emphasize that its a lying shill, since tje original photo actually was a sony. >>4378217>but muh paid off reviewerRemember when petapixel posted the objective lie that the om1 had better shadow recovery than the g9ii and mysteriously received cruise tickets from om system?Olympus pays off reviewers. If even the d850 got water in it they gave non olympus an extra spray or dunk off camera. >muh direct flash shot and edited by a dpreview employeeWhy do we not see these bad results from julia trotti etc?? Perhaps they did it wrong. Perhaps on purpose.
>>4378131>>4378217many such cases
>>4377077>Picks at seal>Camera is in warranty>Claim it fell apart on its own>Does not send it back>Camera is in warranty>Why not send it back>>picked at sealkek>>4378131>Sony takes award winning photo>Photoshop neon green over it in a flub of desperationat least you had the self respect not to add a lie about panasonics autofocus in lil shill brothe nikon faggots edit was much worse. a nikon would not focus on trumps face lol.
>>4378242>Sony takes award winning photoOn a complete fluke nonetheless.
>>4378242>Sony takes award winning photoAP is in contract to only Sony gear, if it was up to the photogs they could use any flagship they want
>>4381610>>4381561Cope. Go fudge your white balance in a panasonic vs sony comparisom and pretend panasonoc makes useful cameras
>>4381616>trying to type on kyPhone im the rain>doesnt fucmong workingMeanwhile my sony is getting sprinkled and doing fineFfs
>>4377098>>4377101The same people who fall for the Toyota reliability meme are the same numales who think Sony/Nikon/Fuji are good.
>>4382112>a bmw is just as reliable bro water pumps are a wear item keep up with maintenance bro toyota reliability is a myth bro they had a recall once bmw doesnt do that its called a maintenance item bro2005 corolla, 300k miles on the original suspension. bushings got harder but everything is still tight.
>>4382112>Toyota reliability memeYou can buy a Corolla from a junkyard and it will still work, i know because i did, pre-2007 Toyota is top-tier shit.The only thing better is a Lexus. Not having to care about the car for months is great, 'yota will last decades if you check it monthly too. BMW is good but spare items are expensive and the motor is a piece of shit to repair. Not as bad as Mercedes have to say.
>>4377077If a new camera is falling apart, why not go to the warranty? Did they actually damage it? All my nikons and canons have little rubber seals like this and fingernails can take chunks out if you’re a mong or trying to clean it
>>4382116>>4382114t. has no clue how their own car works>b-b-but its toyota so its good!!!>bmw have vacuum lines which is bad apparently!!!lmfao even if your car was meaningfully more reliable than any other econobox appliance you A) wouldn't know why and B) it wouldn't matter because they're so hilariously underperforming in all measurable aspects.
>>4382116Lexus is great if you want to pay 4x market value for a camry with an L on it that has as much luxury and tech as a mark 4 corvette.
>>4382120>my car isnt unreliable. it just has special needs.the modern leica man
>>4382120>A) wouldn't know why and B) it wouldn't matterThen why worry about paying extra for a BMW when an used Toyota just werks?I am driving somewhere to take pictures, not racing against the clock you nophoto
>>4382129because they're unsafe, shit on fuel, look like shit, drive like a tractor, they waste interior space like no other manufacturer except maybe jaguar, and because of the vast abundance of retards they're not even cheap.
>>4382130>they're unsafeProofs?>shit on fuelNot on my Corolla>look like shitDoesn't matter>drive like a tractorLearn to drive>they waste interior spaceI drive alone>vast abundance of retards they're not even cheapThis is true lately but i don't have to buy mine often, it's mine alreadySo no arguments against a simpleton like me who just goes from A to B then, i understand your points i think but they are moot on me, i am a bottom of the barrel city slicking user, i don't need more and it's cheaper than any american whip.
>>4382131>Proofs?crash it and see. they cant even stop their accelerator pedals from getting stuck down lmfao. and for a toyota driver thats game over.>Not on my Corollayes it is, you've just never experienced anything good so you have no clue>Learn to drivethis has nothing to do with how you drive, they just drive like a tractor. even a honda will feel like a racecar compared to their intentionally hateful suspension and brakes. not to mention the motors just vibrate as if they're broken from the factory.>I drive aloneyeah no doubt you do with a turd like that hahahahahaha>but i don't have to buy mine often, it's mine alreadydoesn't matter you already wasted your moneyThe whole issue here is you hear things, don't think about them, assume they're true, and never question why you think them. This is why you are a retard.
>>4382134>don't think about them, assume they're true, and never question why you think themI mean i've never crashed the thing, nothing has fallen apart other than the door handle inside from the co-pilot's side, uses less fuel than all my friends' cars, yeah sure it is way less luxurious than my dad's 585i, but like i said it causes me no trouble, spends very little money and people ride along if we want to go for beers or dinner.I spend my cash on camera gear and house items you dummy, my transportation is a done deal, what do you want me to do? buy me a car if you don't like it
>>4382119Do they really break apart just by touching it?
>>4382135I don't care what you do, in fact if you keep inflating the prices of shit cars, I can buy all the good ones.>I spend my cash on camera gear"I'm a one dimensional human, and a gearfag"Weird thing to admit but ok ill take your word for it.
/p/ has fucking shittier opinions on cars than it does on cameras my god
>>4382143By repeatedly scraping at it with a sharp object or a fingernail.
>>4382148The seal on the Sony crumbles straight away just by touching it from normal use.
