/p/ - >24-70 f4, 50 f1.8, 100-400 f5-6.3 Should i sell - Photography

Anonymous

10/28/24(Mon)04:53:21 No.4378766

File: 755-3128547628.png (106 KB, 755x793)

106 KB PNG

Anonymous 10/28/24(Mon)04:53:21 No.4378766 Archived

>24-70 f4, 50 f1.8, 100-400 f5-6.3

Should i sell my gear and go canon?

Anonymous
10/28/24(Mon)05:09:11 No.4378771

Anonymous 10/28/24(Mon)05:09:11 No.4378771

>>4378766
Yes.
>24-70mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8, 100-400mm f/5.6-8
And around in circles we go

Anonymous
10/28/24(Mon)05:25:43 No.4378782

Anonymous 10/28/24(Mon)05:25:43 No.4378782

>>4378766
Yeah, but before switching you should buy bitcoin with the money you get from selling your gear. Imagine the gains.

fe2fucker
10/28/24(Mon)05:26:43 No.4378783

fe2fucker 10/28/24(Mon)05:26:43 No.4378783

Sell your gear and go fuji or leica and like two F2 primes.
or..
Sell your gear and go ricoh gxr
or..
Sell your gear and get info fi- nvm
or..
Sell your gear and get a hassy with a digital back
or..
KEEP your gear and get an old piece of shit flea market digishit for 5 bucks and use only that for a while.

a few "different" options for ya

Anonymous
10/28/24(Mon)05:29:23 No.4378785

Anonymous 10/28/24(Mon)05:29:23 No.4378785

I think I'll quit photography

fe2fucker
10/28/24(Mon)05:34:19 No.4378787

fe2fucker 10/28/24(Mon)05:34:19 No.4378787

>>4378785
Okeidokey. That's completely fine too.

Anonymous
10/30/24(Wed)16:35:57 No.4379772

Anonymous 10/30/24(Wed)16:35:57 No.4379772

canon won

Anonymous
10/30/24(Wed)19:07:47 No.4379792

Anonymous 10/30/24(Wed)19:07:47 No.4379792

>>4378766
if you aren't shooting hot models theire is no point owning full frame, simple as.

Anonymous
10/30/24(Wed)20:31:09 No.4379812

Anonymous 10/30/24(Wed)20:31:09 No.4379812

>>4378766
You don't need a 24-70 f4 period. It's a cope zoom for event photographers when in f2.8. In f4 or worse it is a shitty kit lens with bad rendering. Get an UWA zoom instead.

You do not need a 50mm f1.8. It is a shitty cope lens that was standardized by primitive optics design practices and the overabundance of SLRs on which it is an easy focal length to make work. f1.8 isn't even that fast. A "fast" prime is f1.4 and sharp wide open. If not sharp, it is called an effect lens. Get a 40 or 35 that's not fast, or a 24 or 35 that is hella fast.

The 100-400 is ok for taking snapshits of birds.

>>4379792
Povvo mindset. Do you ask your parents if you deserve upgrades too?
>mooooooom i promise im making money off it and i havent lost it or broke it, you said if i got good grades and practiced ever day i could have a nicer one mom pleaaaaaase
^This is the exact mindset of most "udunneedmoar" poorfag copers on this shitty website.

Anonymous
10/30/24(Wed)21:28:32 No.4379831

Anonymous 10/30/24(Wed)21:28:32 No.4379831

>>4379812
like teenagers in the electric guitar market lmao
>The virgin child: MY MOM SAID I CANT HAVE A GIBSON UNLESS I JOIM A BAND AND MAKE SO MANY DOLLARS! GEARFAGS!
>The chad adult: i bought a gibson for fun and then 2 years later started gigging with an ibanez. still luv me gibbon lepaul. simple as.

Anonymous
10/30/24(Wed)22:57:04 No.4379857

Anonymous 10/30/24(Wed)22:57:04 No.4379857

>>4379792
Wrong. FF exists for those of us who can afford the kit and want maxium IQ (digital. Film apparently has over 100MP of resolution kek). APS-C is for spending less, weighing less, and coping more.

Anonymous
10/31/24(Thu)04:45:03 No.4379953

Anonymous 10/31/24(Thu)04:45:03 No.4379953

>>4378766
Let me guess, panatranny? Might as well hang yourself and record it on panatronic while you ack but knowing how shitty this brand is it will be blurry, noisy mess out of focus of yoyr dysgenic estridol face.