>guy on marketplace agreed to sell me a Leica Q for 2,200 >great condition along with some accessories >another guy agreed to sell me a X100VI for 2,025 after haggling him down from 2,199>been wanting a camera for my travels>used to own the X100V but foolishly sold it right before they exploded in popularity>know from experience that I’ll enjoy the X100VI very much >wanted the X100VI but I can’t get one, and even the local camera shops I called in are selling them for as high as 2,499>willing to shell out the extra 275 to finally have one >but for an extra 175 I can own a 24MP, full frame, Leica camera >it is older though >only thing I don’t like is how much the lens protrudes out unlike the Fuji which is nice and compact Which one should I get?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3024Image Height4032
>>4378830Neither. But if you insist, get the Leica. Eventually the Fujis are going to crash in price once the fad passes, while the Leica will hold it's value and is overall a much better camera anyway.
>>4378830>Which one should I get?Both because you gave your word you fucking nigger, stop wasting people's time
>>4378830I couldn't deal with the RGB EVF on the Q. When you move your eye you see the RGB streaks. Also 28mm is pleb.
>>4378830both sucktim curry got better shit done with a nikon slr than any leica fag and no really good photos have ever been taken on a fuji (or any digital camera really)
>>4378830Both are hipster toys.Get a Nikon, Canon or Snoy, if you care about actual photograp.
>>4379339>tim curryIt's all staged. No decisive moment whatshoever.He saved much monies by buying Nipon, so he had some left to throw a few rupees.
>>4379353>Good photographs are staged:o
Fuji because EVF's kinda take the fun out of things.If you want a leica get an M
