>>4379210
No pubes on this, the scan is sharp, and everything is clean He doesnt post here.

>>4379210
two words: long exposures

Get a film with a high latitude in overexposition, black and white is ideal, 4x5 is ideal, this guy is doing it right

Make sure the shadows are well and good, worry about the highlights after.
Worst comes to worst, use a graduated ND.

>>4379221
My pro work is a different ball game, kid.

>>4379221
nah I bet this fag just doesn't post his pro work in here but go listen to any of his gearfaggotry videos and it's 100% on point the /p/ consensus on everything
also he can't take digital photos and that makes me even more suspicious
>>4379222
and colour? is it feasible to shoot interiors on slides?

>>4379239
/p/ isn't a special secret club. It's just autistic men who haven't been paid off yet and easily develop a hatred of the state of the digital camera market.

>>4379227
Please don't larp as art repro fag, doghair/huskycuck.

>>4379254
You haven't heard the new lore drop, newfag? Artreprofag,huskyfag,cinefag,doghair, both canons, and Ken rockwell are all the same person.

>>4379267
Thats a cope for huskyfag/doghair nuking his socials as soon as someone let his secret about being the same person slip

At least we no longer have him playing good cop bad cop in /mft/ and panasonic can now be discussed without some idiot saying durr film sensor bigger 400mp at max contrast from blinding my dog with 1000w strobes

>>4379292
jannies have been more active lately as well

>>4379293
No they have not.

Its quiet because doghair killed his huskyfag alt and the om5 guy sold all his gear for bitcoins and only has a camera that shuts off if it moves too quickly, so he’s basically not into photography anymore and is probably fucking off to get a repair quote and sell his z6.

File: DSC_2659.jpg (1.64 MB, 2012x3024)

1.64 MB JPG

>>4379296
>and only has a camera that shuts off if it moves too quickly
no the cam stays on. the IBIS just shuts off. but without a /m43/ general there's just no possibility for a heated yet civilized discussion. so all I do is post a bunch of images to /rpt/ and that's it
ngl I think about getting back into m43 just to have the /m43/ general going again
without it the board is dead and it['s just a bunch of videofags and "muh jewish history of photography" bullshit no one cares for

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 6_2
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	5600
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Image Width	2012
Image Height	3024
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4379298
I revise my post
>hmmm i should buy cameras so i can argue about them. Kill all the jews! -u
I hoped you’d quit at least temporarily and degearfag but instead you’re getting worse

Dear fucking god just fix your camera and live with 1 body 1 lens and some flashes for a while until your head finishes making its way out of your asshole

>>4379299
>>hmmm i should buy cameras so i can argue about them. Kill all the jews! -u
yes, that's pretty much me.

>>4379296
No no, they have, I have seen shitposts dissappear in a refresh

>>4379300
Film really seems more like your thing. Then you can argue about film stocks and chemicals, and afford to buy more sensor sizes from 110 to 4x5.

Downside: most filmfags are good photographers and you’d look even worse by comparison

>>4379302
That was just moop getting re-banned before he started rambling about how his life would be better if he took puberty blockers

>>4379303
I did film back in the late 90s/early 2000s. not gonna back. just too much trouble. and now way too expensive - at least it was the poor man's cope when I did it because digital was unattainable. but nowadays 3 rolls of film buy you a new full frame body or whatever

>>4379210
Do you think this crooked shit with blown out highlights is good?

Interior photography does not change much with medium. Bounce diffused strobes for fill flash so the windows arent 20ev away. Use focal lengths from 14 to 35 on FF. You do not need tilt shift because the verticals are close and short enough for the camera to be true with them. That’s it.

The only thing that changes on film is a need for brighter strobes because any film with more resolution than a d850 has way less dynamic range than a d850.

>>4379306
>goes into photography to count pennies
Find another hobby

>>4379308
uhm also to buy cameras to troll 4chan

>>4379309
That's absolutely retarded and the only one you're trolling is your bank account

File: craps.jpg (150 KB, 1024x1024)

150 KB JPG

>>4379308
>>4379309
you both are just salty because I have fun and enjoy photography :)

>>4379310
i blame duh joos for this!

>>4379311
No, it's honest advice, if you are going to be counting pennies, photography isn't the right place

>>4379292
This makes absolutely no sense if you use any sort of critical thinking skills, but it is hilarious nonetheless. Is it just convenient to believe or are you really that gullible?

I'm not the guy who gives MP numbers to film either. It's a silly and useless comparison in almost everyway IMO.

Maybe the true cope is blaming everything you don't like on one person???

>>4379315
I liked you more when you were cANON

>>4379318
I'm sorry. He only comes out occasionally these days.

>>4379318
His husky persona was better solely because the dog was cute. This chicken phase sucks.

File: img256.jpg (1.4 MB, 2760x1693)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4379210
You know what you were doing making this thread, but to stay at least a bit on topic.

A view camera is a good idea because you can fix your perspective. He is using a pretty wide angle lens as well.

The image is quite flat, and the shadows are all exposed very well. He probably used a spot meter to place his shadows in zone 3, so reduced exposure by 2 stops.

There is no information on the discontinued polydol developer, so there's no way to check if he pulled his film, but I would assume that he did because of the strong highlights in the scene and the relatively flat nature of the image overall.

If you really want to get into it you can use strobes placed out of sight to bring up the interior light levels to within 6ish stops of the exterior light to use slide film, or not have blown out highlights. Much more laborious to do, and it would be tricky to maintain a natural look to the lighting.


>>4379340
Lol. I post 2 old chick pics and I am in my chicken phase now?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.5.0 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:05 16:30:54
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4379345
You are not an expert. You are not a photographer. And you will never be a photographer. You are temporary AV club dilettante who will have an entirely new interest as soon as you start shitposting on another board in a year.

>>4379298
You're even worse.

>>4379360
how can he not be a photographer? he only bought his 3rd camera in the past year since /p/ kept insulting his dirty snapshits and he needed a bigger film to impress people

>>4379210
>Any tips on an interior photography on film?
First and foremost: Get a shifting wide angle lens

File: img246 (1).jpg (830 KB, 1693x2753)

830 KB JPG

>>4379360
Tell me how I'm wrong.

>>4379363
I haven't had time to build my large darkroom that will be able to enlarge 4x5 and wanted to shoot/print sheet film, so I got an 8x10 camera to do contact prints with. Thinking anything else is pure projection.

Also yes, I use my 1V as my snapshitting camera. I see absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Now enjoy more cock pics. :D

>>4379345
>>4379384
at this point are the cum/hair/dust stains on the photos part of his style?

>>4379239
Slides are still very tolerant to over-exposure, but C-41 would be my chosen sweet-spot unless I plan on going large format and I want to show off

>>4379666
check'd
also what about white balance with the mixed outdoor sunlight and indoor LEDs (let's be honest it's very rare to stumble upon anything else than LEDs indoor these days)