Why do you care for a camera you won't buy?

>>4379237
>Why do you care about competition and its effects on the market?

File: file.png (1.22 MB, 1150x1163)

1.22 MB PNG

Reminder the A1 has worse than APS-C dynamic range and the A1II will almost certainly be even worse

SNOY only looks good if you compare them to cannot POS R because you're a noskill snapshitter who needs magic AI autofocus and magic AI framing assistance to take your photos for you

>>4379245
So essentially you are saying that everyone lacking basic skills can be a pro photographer and their autofocus is magic?

>>4379256
Did you see the 2024 olympics photography, especially at the ping pong event? Have you seen how sports photography works in general?
>Spam snapshits with the right person centered
>sooc jpegs are constantly FTP'd to home base
>interns cull and crop
That's sports photography. That's what cameras like canons, the z8/z9, and the a1/a9 are built for. That's why they sometimes have fucking ethernet ports. On a camera.

To upload SOOC jpegs to interns who crop and cull as fast as possible.

it's basically not photography anymore.

>>4379257
So literally every sports reporter doesn't have any other option as to buy this? Sounds pretty cool to me.

>>4379260
They can also buy the canon r3/r1 or the nikon z8/z9 and just send slightly fewer jpegs for the interns to cull. Its not like IQ is any good, or the photos are used at higher resolutions than 1920x1080.

>>4379263
>send slightly fewer jpegs for the interns to cull
Sounds awful and not worth the price.

>>4379243
>effects on the market
Which will be : none.

>>4379245
Sony is clearly the best one in that pic tho, you can actually read the bottom text

>>4379285
Thats because its 50mp bayer. The other cameras are low res, 25mp, 20mp, and 40mp xtrans which is only as good as 24mp bayer (just like bayer is lower res than mono/foveon)

Dynamic range is clearly the same for all 4. The FFs are behind a stop from stacked bsi high speed shit, the g9ii is ahead a stop from panasonics innovations in simultaneous gain stage readout (which phones were already doing 10 years ago). All you get is bokeh and less shot noise, but not more DR.

>>4379245
Jesus christ I take that back, i looked closer and the R3 is a fucking joke

Does it actually have less dynamic range than the g9ii
Jesus fucking christ lmao

So much for canon’s forced noise reduction at every ISO. It looks like the shadow recovery ability of a nikon d70.

>>4379235
if it's sony then you already know that their 28-70 will be 1/2 the weight of canon's counterpart.

>>4379289
And somehow vignette less.

>>4379269
Samyang's bargain 35-150 exists only because Tamron released their 35-150

>>4379235
Were you guys not told that the huge wave of sony hate we got last month was paid shills trying to force memes ahead of sony's release cycle?

You were told.

>I-it will be worse than the last one or as bad guys I swear
Suuuuure.

>>4379245
What the fuck are you talking about idiot

The sony a1 obviously has more DR than all of these even though you kneecapped both full frame cameras by sticking them in E shutter.

>>4379235
Z9 killed the a1 on the spot so i am betting the a1 II will be a monster on video.
That also means new Z9 next year, i just want a new P1000 goddamn it

>>4379373
>Z9 killed the a1 on the spot
No, it really didn't.

The Z9 killed itself on the spot.

>>4379378
>Z9 dying
Sure thing buddy, let's ignore the EVF quality, the video specs, the construction quality and sale numbers backing the pro opinion.
Z9 is the a1 made better, the a1 II will be as good if not better so that means pushing the tech forward.

File: takeyourmeds.jpg (38 KB, 554x554)

38 KB JPG

>>4379361

Is this a good upgrade from an a6700 if money isn't an issue

I'm shooting crop at the moment

>>4379623
>I'm shooting crop
With a 6700? You don't say.
>Money isn't an issue
Retarded question, money IS an issue, always. You are just baiting for bored responses and walls of texts

>>4379627
t.poorfag

>>4379373
>>4379385
the famous Trump pic was made by A1

>>4379629
>Dude I totally have the money to buy Sony's flagship the moment it hots the shelves!
>And I also have the money to buy all the lenses I need for said flagship with the appropriate quality!
Yeah sure, coming from a guy who has a fucking a6700 I bet you have the $20k hot and ready to upgrade lmao

Nikon has the best selection of lenses though

Mirrorless cameras are tearing this community apart

I shoot an A7R2. Not sure why you'd need more than that.

File: .jpg (1.16 MB, 3840x2560)

1.16 MB JPG

>>4379237
I'm actually considering a used A1II in 1-2 years as an upgrade from my 1st gen A9. I want higher MP but don't want to give up the speed, so A1 is really the only option. I also want the bigger A9III grip and the fully articulated screen, so 1st gen is out.

>>4379848
The Mark 2 bodies were janky and the battery life was a joke. Mark 3 bodies is what the Mark 2 bodies should have been and are refined enough to not feel like an unfinished prototype.

File: drumpf.png (954 KB, 741x895)

954 KB PNG

>>4379632
Wrong!

>>4379385
>bunch of memes for a bg only blob
the a1 with an add on grip outlasts the z9
sony build is better than olympus since 2020
better autofocus and dynamic range on sony
better lenses on sony
nikon is all recalls, iphone color science and crooked viewfinder

lets be real, its a sony/canon world and fuji is rising up to a distant third for all the weirdos and terminal gearfags who are all about holding and being seen with the camera but not about using it. if you want to get work done, new expensive sony/canon and write it off. if you just want pics with a fairly competent camera buy the cheapo crop bodies - the r50, r7, and a6700 are GOAT cope sensor cameras and you could really get shit done with the r7. its better than most full frame cameras.

>>4379235
Im seeing a lot of nikon z gear for sale locally as of late