[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1711804007775056.png (289 KB, 740x737)
289 KB
289 KB PNG
Had about $1300 to spare, so bought a secondhand sony a6600 with sony 20mm f/2.8 lens for $800. Got $500 left. What's a good lens I can pair this with? Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8? Trying to go for variety and thinking maybe I should go for something that does mid macro shots instead, but obviously my budget might be lacking.
>>
Lighting gear and a nice tripod
>>
I heard the ibis on the 6600 is kinda shit compared to the 6700

Personally I was thinking of buying a 6400+tamron 17-70 f2.8 to upgrade from my rx100 but /p/ shilled me into the full frame meme for another $400 more (also I wanted good low light)

Crop still has some good bokeh at 2.8 on lenses like that
>>
>>4380211
Haven’t heard of that lens. Got a link?
>>
>>4380207
Sony E 35mm macro. And even though /p/ will shit on it, I like the kit lens. It's super cheap and also small like the 20mm and gives you some variety to help you find your favorite focal length. If you know you like wide/normal/tele, you can get a solid lens for that.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.