>>4385324
>Splenda thread
I’ll wait for the next Nikon general

Lmao its funny you suggested I get a DF, then I explained why I wanted a D4 and here we are.

>>4385337
Oh but what do you expect, poppet? You poverty riddled bunblefucks are all the same, constantly buying outdated trash to impress one another. All without taking a single competent photograph with any of it of course. You feed off one another.

>>4385342
lil bro got a little peeved

>>4385337

I was thinking of you, it's dope, go get one they're cheap now.

>>4385350
I would but I'm in the middle of something right now. Might change hobbies.

>>4385324
>dandruff
disgusting faggot
>>4385342
>All without taking a single competent photograph with any of it of course.
goes for most nikon shooters
even if they do, the photo is ruined by soul sucking nikon color soience

File: DSC_8490.jpg (653 KB, 1500x998)

653 KB JPG

>>4385461

Hey now I've had it for all of a couple days now I'm still learning its ways.

It is insane what you can do with this camera and it's 10 years old. It's not going to be my bread and butter, it will share a home with my D800 but for super low light, sports, anything where I need super good AF and high speed, this will be the ticket. I have a ton of stuff lined up for vacation in a few days so you'll see it in the upcoming Sugar Thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D4
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	822
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	85 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:14 19:20:17
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4385461
>nikon shooters
You mean /p/ shooters. You're clearly one of the worst ones if you let brandfagging take precedence over your core standards.

>>4385465
>1500x998
>653 KB
are you downscaling shit according to the sticky or why are you committed to posting in fucking thumbnail tier quality?
blurry and uninspired

>>4385342
>poverty
Post camera on countertop
>single competent photograph
Post two. Rules:
No buildings
No cats (dogs and birds ok)
No rocks
No leaves
No backs of heads

>>4385467
>You mean /p/ shooters.
nikon shooters are generally spergy
>brandfagging take precedence over your core standards
what? i've simply noticed patterns

File: IMG_0769.jpg (239 KB, 639x836)

239 KB JPG

>>4385470
>i’ve noticed patterns
You and everyone else in a straitjacket

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	639
Image Height	836
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4385470
>spergy
Already backpedalling from your claim. We all know you are a snapshitter, brandfag. I'd have given this same response regardless of which brand you chose to get mad over, kek.

>>4385471
i'm rigorous, i promise
i can usually tell a niggon apart before opening exif in /rpt/ threads etc
>>4385472
>Already backpedalling from your claim
no, how is that backpedalling?

File: ND8_0389.jpg (891 KB, 1500x1001)

891 KB JPG

>>4385468

Mostly sticky but no one needs to see 3mb full res pictures of shitty truckersnaps.

I'm on a 1080p screen and expanded that fills up 3/4 of my screen, it's more than enough.

>>4385469

>Expecting accountability on a Malaysian competitive underwater basketweaving site

Bold of you to assume they will do that, no one here takes pictures except for a few people.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Photographer	phot0synthesis
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	872
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:28 22:08:07
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4385473
No, you’re simply schizophrenic. You sound like the templeOS guy. Get a grip.

>>4385479
No one uses 1080p screens except indians and brazilians

Get something from this decade. Pixel peeping accusations are how I spot thirdies lol.

>>4385481
Poor sug would have to sell half his dusty, basically repeated gear items to upgrade from an ibm thinkpad to a better put together mac kek
>owns 5 functionally identical nikon DSLRs AND a zf

>>4385479
>Mostly sticky
ignore it. it's dated retardbabble
>but no one needs to see 3mb full res pictures
yes we do. just don't waste your time shittyfying your photos and we're all better for it
>I'm on a 1080p screen and expanded that fills up 3/4 of my screen
doesn't matter; there's a setting that make expanded images fit the window. so it's not relevant

curious how they made this faggot ass guideline about <1 MB filesizes <1000 resolution in one of the few boards where image quality actually matters. and image bump limit still at 150. yet, the max image filesize is actually 5 MB here contrary to 4 MB on most other blue boards
what were they thinking?

>>4385481

I'm actually looking at a Lenovo P71 right now, not quite this decade but will be a noticeable improvement over my i7-2960XM E6520 that I built in 2012

>>4385485
Eggy wrote the sticky to defend his own blurry pentax shooting, 56k internet having honor iirc

Just another incidence of a neverending manifestation of photographer idiocy:
Anything that makes it obvious that another camera does something mine doesn’t is an incorrect activity!

>>4385488
Bruh last year’s macbook pro would shit all over all of that lmoa

>>4385473
>how is that backpedalling
Because your argument changed from poor photographic quality to "sperg" which means literally nothing when it comes to photography. Also you haven't disproven my accusation that you are a snapshitter.

>>4385488
>Buying a $2500 ewaste gamer brick instead of a mac

>>4385498
>>4385490

Macs are for fags, end of story.

>>4385465
Looks like shit, even at the low res you posted
Crap composition, lame subject, especially given your job
Uninspired, bland

>>4385499
so you're saying it's perfect for you

>>4385506

bro its a truckersnap chill

>>4385509
all your pictures are trucker snapshits

>>4385510
>all your pictures are xyz snapshits

File: DSC_1098.jpg (776 KB, 3008x2000)

776 KB JPG

For me, it's the ccd

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	Ver.2.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	824
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	135 mm
Serial Number	10033624
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:02:17 02:28:42
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/3.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	90.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3008
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	200
Image Quality	BASIC
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	HIGH
Focus Mode	AF-S
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	200
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Tone Compensation	AUTO
Lens Type	Nikon G Series
Lens Range	90.0 mm; f/2.8
Auto Focus	Single Area, Center Selected, Top Focused
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Color Mode	Portrait sRGB
Lighting Type	NATURAL
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	14667
Image Optimization	SHARP
Saturation 2	NORMAL

>>4385511
How did you know I work as a XYZ

Learning about cameras, and I have a D5600 that I've been playing with
But what place does the D5600 have in Nikons lineup? I'm not familiar with the tiers of cameras. Is this a budget camera? Is it really good at doing anything in particular? An analogy would be appreciated and maybe funny, thanks.

>>4385826
>Is this a budget camera?
yes
>Is it really good at doing anything in particular?
no, but it's fine. as a beginner you want a camera that's ok for everything, more than camera that's perfect for anything

File: Screenshot 2024-11-16 195331.png (250 KB, 1516x1402)

250 KB PNG

>>4385826

>>4385826
Its not your last camera. Dont even worry about it.

Buy something truly nice (ie: canon, sony, hasselblad, fuji) when you are ready. Or just swap for a d750, 780, or 850 if you’re poor.

File: _0D41108-2.jpg (1.3 MB, 3280x4928)

1.3 MB JPG

>>4385324
I have a D4. I do all my jobs with it but I don't want to post any of that stuff on 4chan. Here's a cat.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D4
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.0.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	846
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	135 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:16 23:58:23
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 1137-0186.jpg (1.39 MB, 1400x1001)

1.39 MB JPG

>>4385826

D5600 is dope, had one. Great for travel. Weighs nothing, same sensor as the 7500.

Glass is what's more important anyway, a D5600 with nice ED lenses will shit all over a D6 with an AF-D 24-120 zoom all day.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D5600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	836
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2020:12:05 08:56:30
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4386064
Creeping on children, another low!

>>4386071

That's because I have balls, while the rest of /p/ takes pictures of the backs of people's heads, argues over gear and gets crippling social anxiety taking their camera out in public.

Maybe if you grew some testicles and dropped them you could have the same fortitude as me. I walked 1000ft of elevation up Clingman's Dome @ 6600ft and the Appalachian Trail is around that corner, to get that shot, are you telling me you're not better than an out-of-shape fat fuck dragging a soccer mom camera up a mountain who hasn't seen his dick since the first Trump administration? That's the real new low, faggot.

You're not even better than a fat autistic truck driver.

>>4386077
>the rest of /p/
Those delusions of grandeur are really showing right now. Why do you let people do this to you repeatedly? You always make yourself look worse than the people attacking you do.

>>4386077
don't talk about fitness you are fucking ROUND, LOL!
You ARE the out-of-shape fuck
Have some self-respect and eat healthy and work out
You should be ashamed of yourself looking the way you do

>>4386077
This tripfag is always a sad read
>aggressively self hating ken rockwell, if ken rockwell were a worse photographer
Only time you shown self esteem for more than half a sentence is when you thought you could punch down because a stranger in a photo was asian and had your least favorite brand. Ffs yikes. Racist, yaps at strangers in photos, and fat. Would you have talked shit if he was posting that himself? No I think you hate yourself too much to be direct with a 5’6” asian photojourno larper and were excited it was just someone eggy saw. If he could have talked back you would have crumbled into another self depreciating rant.

Get a grip. Start a basic bitch routine, stop eating fried food and processed carbs, and sell all your photography junk except for the one camera and one lens you truly need (NOT the set that would be the most "epic" and "btfo/mog the ___" on /p/ according to local gearfag memes, dont be a doghair!)
Also work on getting rid of your repressed anti-asian racism, at this point in your life your only option is thai/viet chicks and their mysterious old hairy white man who isnt even rich fetish.

If you follow this advice you might one day have a life outside of dumping photos of rocks on /p/ and shooting hookers

>>4386064
Looks like an iphone shot taken after dear old dad ran around the corner honestly

Every photo youve posted ever has been riddled with accumulated slight mistakes and oversights - both artistic and technical - characteristic of someone who is not used to using or editing with their current camera yet. I can just tell when someone rivals snappiness for ewaste collection or switches kit more often than leibovitz.

>>4386092
>paragraphs of anger
What did he do to you? Kek. I assume you're a very short Asian?

>>4386092
solid advice /10
glad it's wasted on Stevia

>>4386096
>its not pity its anger!
>u must be asian
Trip on fatso
I’m average white, and not the fat kind. The germanic dutch kind.
I pity your self hating rants and ewaste centric gearfaggotry. Its sad that you haven’t improved one bit in the past 5 years. Get a grip creampuff.

File: 1468373256435.gif (3.95 MB, 425x425)

3.95 MB GIF

>>4386083
>>4386088
>>4386092
>>4386093
>>4386100
>>4386102

>Sugar posts
>Ass-blasted trolls respond immediately within an hour (probably the same dude)

What does any of this have to do with a D5600? You're arguing with a fat truck driver on the butthole of the Internet, you are the most pathetic and sad individuals I have seen, not me. /p/ sucks now because dickheads like you run off anyone who posts photos.

The only reason I haven't left is because my very existence lives rent-free in some bed-wetter's head every day who hasn't touched another woman in years and it makes my dick hard watching you devote time to me and all I'm doing is snapshitting and enjoying life.

I have a ton of shit lined up to shoot over the next couple of weeks of vacation and I can't fucking wait I'm going to have so much fun while you're here arguing over DxO scores and MTF charts, giving fake C&C and jerking off over equipment you can't afford. What a sad existence.

tl;dr: get rekt incels

pic related: you

>>4386200
>refers to self in third person
Just Sucralose things
Nice reddit spacing btw, you should go back there.
-1

>>4386232
>Reddit spacing
You mean paragraphs?

>>4386235
>1-2 sentences
>3 words
>paragraphs
No, I meant what I said. Reddit spacing.

>>4386200
The difference between you and us is we just point out what you call yourself and how bad your photos are and you throw random shit at the wall hoping it sticks. Also we dont need dramatic victim acts.

>>4386200
>i am better than the rest of /p/
>i am the only person who goes outside
>i am the only person who doesn't take photos of the backs of heads
You make posts like that and call people trolls for taking issue with it? I don't think so, you're clearly begging for this attention. Why?

>>4386243
That guys photos are so bad he makes doghair, huskyfag, and corgi snapper look uniquely talented and all he had to say to an honest to god better photographer than him who works with just one body and one lens was
>ew, mirrorless. gay.
He’s just a digislug gearfag to the core. That post has gotta be projection lol

File: 432210839_217117147322352(...).jpg (315 KB, 1542x2048)

315 KB JPG

>>4386238

It's about fucking time someone actually figured me out instead of trolling and shit posting, you get the gold fucking star award, seriously.

I DO post random shit to see what sticks and I've been trying to do it without anyone noticing I'm actually doing that.

The problem with the rest of the internet is that it's a hugbox and no matter where you post to, people are going to say its good because they're used to seeing overprocessed shit on their phones which runs everything though AI and crazy image processing to look good on a screen that fits in your hand and they don't actually know what a good image is. And then you have places like Zogbook which has cultural and personal biases and you have to be PC as opposed to /p/ where people call me a nigger.

I know for a fact in every Sugar Thread there are about 5 to 10 really solid keepers out of the 150 image limit but I've posted shit that I thought sucked and /p/ liked it. I can throw shit on the wall here and filter out trolls later I don't care about people here, in my almost 15 years here I have met all of one of you in person and they don't come here anymore. Anyway, shits over and done with.

This was supposed to be a Niggon thread so let's keep it that way at some point I may be an insufferable fagtron but I do know my equipment and I've done a lot of Nikon repairs. The last one of these I helped anon get their 17-35 back together.

>>4386245
In the time you wrote this post you could have gotten a 3 or 4 snapshits closer to learning to take better photos (if you were already outside instead of lurking 4chan)

>>4386245
Hey Sugar, how easy is it to replace the bayonet mount on a 24-70mm f/2.8 AF-S? Mine needs replacement

Im gonna sell my whole nikon kit.
Goodbye most based system ever.

Now I gotta come up with a new name..

>>4386077
new pasta

>>4386245
>supposed to be a nikon thread
Then you should have made it anonymously, but you didn’t tripfag.

>>4386396

Are you talking about the part that the lens connects to the body or the hood bayonet mount? Both are fairly simple.

The lens mount to body is just remove screws and replace, the big thing is you HAVE to use JIS screws and don't use cheap shit or you'll round the heads. I used the iFixIt Manta kit that has like 80 bits in it, shits awesome. The JIS bits are labeled in it too. Make sure you keep track of the small screws on the sides of the electrical contacts they are different sizes, there's two of the same size for the contacts and three to hold the plastic light shield on the inside of the mount.

The hood mount is the common one and you have to go in from the bayonet lens mount to get to it.

This is the video I used for the hood mount, it also covers the bayonet removal. It's not too hard just keep track of the screws.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkEIEojXJ-k

>>4386396
Hi, Sugar.

>>4386479
i love when ppl steal my name, all these rent free spaces all for meeeeeee!

>>4386479
>>4386485
ignore these imposters

>>4386200
>The only reason I haven't left is because my very existence lives rent-free
Fuck off heeb and your dirty-assed jannitoid lackeys, i've been banned 3 times already for replying to you, you don't leave because you might as well be a mod here, if you really are just bite your balls and take the L when an anon wins an argument.
A jew keeps saying goodbye but doesn't leave

>>4386487
shut up you know there's only one of us around here

>>4386494
uhhhh cringe?

>>4386479
>>4386485
>>4386487
>>4386494
>>4386495
samefag

I finally came to my senses and sold my leica meme camera for something thats actually good lol

>>4386498
Would never catch me dead with sonyons

>>4386505
Why is your APS-C camera so big and expensive?

>>4386511
Why do you even ask? You know I love archaic and obsolete formats.

File: 1690457519110458.png (146 KB, 268x401)

146 KB PNG

>>4386492

U mad?

>mfw

File: tripfaggots.jpg (219 KB, 974x689)

219 KB JPG

tripfags unite

File: P1030831 1.jpg (1.73 MB, 1944x2592)

1.73 MB JPG

bitcoin is mooning, soon I'm a 50Rfucker
selling the om-5 for bitcoins was the best thing I ever did

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-GX8
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Image Width	1944
Image Height	2592
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto

>>4386674
50mp mf is a cope. It has no advantage over ff without the 100mp sensor.

>>4386674
I bought a Cessna this year and don't own any bitcoin, nor did I have to sell anything to buy it. Do better.

>>4386771
Youre talking to someone who prides himself on needing gambling to afford the worst medium format camera

>>4386746
don't care. I like the RF style body and also I can shitpost here. I'm more than happy with 20mpx why the fuck would I want to clutter my NAS with 100mpx files lol?
enjoy your time ... the macro four thirds posting will start soon

>>4386780
>he gambled on pump and dump scams so he could have more "epic" exif
Well, enjoy micro four thirds users mocking 1: your sensors inability to outperform a d850 in the real world 2: your god awful photography that seems to actually be getting worse. You have become what you once baited, and lost to, only this little gear slapfight isnt one you can win.

I just upgraded from a D810 to a D850 and bros...worth every penny. Absolutely amazing camera, the fact I can turn it into a pseudo-D500 by shooting in DX crop is really neat. However, my old pirated Lightroom copy doesn't support D850 NEF files. Is it possible to pirate a newer version or should I finally bend the knee to Adobe?

>>4386441
I meant the body/lens mount. Thanks for the info, I'll get some screwdrivers ordered while I wait for a new mount to come from chinkland.

>>4386950
>Is it possible to pirate a newer version
I think all Adobe photo products can be pirated until they introduced AI tools, then the subscription model turned it harder to pirate due to always-online.
My fear about buying new gear is the fact some tools do not recognize new RAW files in pirated software for Windows 8.1.

I say you should check around, D850 is 2017 IIRC so there should absolutely be a pirated something for it.