[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Anybody know what exact camera gear setup this guy is using?

Looks like a sony but unsure if FX3 or FX30 or A7CR etc

Either way, the video quality & audio for youtube blew the fuck out of the video quality that the Sony DSLR vlogger team faggots were using. (A7s3 or around there)

Video quality here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSiRv7Nek0c
>>
Heres a sidephoto of the lens, looks like a wide aperture g master or sigma?
>>
Looks like a tamron zoom because sigma zooms are more compact than that

A7cr comes in black so it's probably that
>>
>>4389337
have you seen the video quality? it looks like the FX30 as a minimum imo
This is marginally the lowest baseline I would ever want my videos to look desu so I really am interested in knowing the exact model
>>
>>4389341
You can easily get that quality with an FX30
>>
>>4389337
Why would anyone buy a 61mp snoy for an elaborate video kit

The rolling shutter is so bad, and its a lot of money for megapixels that video cant even use
>>
Bump
>>
>>4389337
>sigma zooms are more compact than tamron
L O L
>>
File: .png (61 KB, 134x293)
61 KB
61 KB PNG
Sony lens at 5:03
>>
File: .png (282 KB, 636x416)
282 KB
282 KB PNG
Aperture ring, so 24-70 gm2?
>>
File: .png (206 KB, 355x354)
206 KB
206 KB PNG
9:17, definitely not a FX or C cam. Standard A7 of some sort.
>>
>>4390385
A7S III most likely, or possibly A7 IV you can see the hinge for the fully articulated screen and I think those are the only snoys with that.
>>
>>4390383
>>4390384
>>4390385
>>4390407
Thanks bro, looks like I'mma be saving money and getting the A7S III not the FX3

Also in comparison, the Fishtank S2-S3 series were shot in FX3 rigs and they look decent but nothing to the quality of the A7SIII

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5llNYfI6IqY



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.