File: dt_DSCF3776.jpg (4.95 MB, 2109x3414)

4.95 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:03 14:10:40
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	4.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2109
Image Height	3414
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Unknown
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

because no one wants 10mb snapshits of the backs of people's heads and the corners of buildings

there's no one here really good enough to warrant anything over 5mb, limit should be 3mb tbqh

>>4389500
based&checked

File: dt_DSCF3777_01.jpg (1.49 MB, 1197x1588)

1.49 MB JPG

>>4389500
the limit should be 25bmi

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:03 14:42:20
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	4.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1197
Image Height	1588
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Unknown
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>4389500
nah, i need 10 MB for that guy that posts threads of tree branches

File: dt_DSCF3793.jpg (1.29 MB, 2186x1351)

1.29 MB JPG

a disgusting lardass
with his trembly fat paws
around some vinatge glase

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:03 14:34:22
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	5.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2186
Image Height	1351
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Auto
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>4389500
tell us again about those bitches you paid to not run away immediately

>>4389510
based birding schizo

>>4389513
he's right though

>>4389500
>you DESERVE jpeg artifacts, says the guy that literally cant take a good photo
If you werent a destitute meth head you could afford better internet jussaiyan. Dont drag the rest of us down because you spend your whole minimum wage paycheck on one hooker, one ewaste, and one baggie of drugs each week.

>>4389536
this guy is a trucker he is the backbone of america

think again next time you enjoy a box of whip-its that were delivered OTR

>maximum file size allowed is 5 MB
pixel peepers btfo'd?

>>4389539
Sort of, but not really.

>>4389539
Pixel peeping is based>>4389538
. Photos should be enjoyable for detail and the big picture. The only people who have a problem with it are motivated by financial insecurity and owning shit cameras like fujifilms or always miss focus/have shaky hands.

>>4389541
"Pixel peeping" was in fact invented by coping digislugs. Yes, the same ones that claimed film always had less resolution than their current digital camera or as much as their present shitty ccd scanner. (First film was 6mp, then 8, then 12, d750 came out and oh okay film is 16mp maybe 18…)
It was always about begging people not to notice how much worse fine detail was on digital

Today we can slap a negative under an a7rii and see they were wrong, or a
Mf negative under a fuji gfx and laugh even harder
The few of those coping digislugs to survive now insist that its not real resolution if you can see any grain whatsoever. The cope!

I resize all my photos to be 1500 px on the longest side and at jpeg quality 12 theyre like 2 megapixels, maybe 3 if theres a lot of colour variation.

Literally dont need more for web use.

>>4389556
Megabytes* not pixels lol.

>>4389555
pixel peeping is a geartard thing
Derailing threads because you wont spend $20k on a lense you're gonna use once a year similar to the people on /out/ that spend thousands on gear only to go camping once a year

>>4389558
if the reason you like photography is because the gear than you're no different than a retard that buys the same
guitar multiple times

>>4389559
>buys the same guitar multiple times
thinking that it's gonna be different somehow
you should be doing a hobby because you like it
not to be a vain troon

>>4389541
>fujifilms or always miss focus/have shaky hands.
you can buy good tripods for cheap and getting rid of shakey hands is easy
just tuck your elbows and hold your camera closer to your center of gravity and if you're still shakey after that you can get deceng tripods for $20-50

>>4389563
Something ive noticed about IRL boards is that we get all the backwash of people who are tired of the same hobbies day in day out. People from the no life boards like /v/ or /r9k/ and even /g/. Only for them to bring the same mentality that they grew tired of into the same hobbies and wonder why they're still just as angry in a new environment

>>4389558
"Pixel peeping" is a normal thing. Photos are of reality. The fine details are part of the value they offer over a sloppy impressionist painting.

You are just a coping digital camera fag mad that the fine detail on his 40mp foolji or 24mp snoykonon is worse than 35mm film (=36mp non-bayer, not achievable in a single digital shot due to films natural imperviousness to aliasing and interpolation artifacts)

You dont even need a super sharp lens on film, the sharpness just ups the contrast, crispness and punch. you can still get 90% of the fine detail. Sad that $1500 of digital gear still falls to a $15 roll of funny plastic and a $50 light tight box.

>>4389558
Complaining about people zooming in is a geartard thing.
>NOOO STOP YOURE GOING TO SEE MY CAMERA SUCKS!
>DONT LOOK THERE YOU CAN TELL I MISSED FOCUS NOOOOO I DONT WANT TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR THAT STOP LOOKING
>MY PHOTOS CANT BE GOOD UP CLOSE UNLESS I SPEND MORE MONEEEEY

>>4389565
i shoot dslr not reading all that
proving my point by raging over nothing

>>4389567
>i shoot dslr so i need to be morally opposed to photos being anything but grids of 2 million little squares
Alas it would take over 36 million little squares to show you whats really on a $0.20 plastic rectangle exposed by a $20 minolta maxxum so this is just cope

We should be sharing max enlargements but digislugs just cant stop dragging us down with their embarrassment and cope

>>4389568
sorry that happened to you.
Maybe if you went out on a regular basis instead of pixel peeping on 4chan you'd be less angry

>>4389570
I do go out. Actually got poetry club in 30.

Too bad you’re too busy gear coping on 4chan to accept that no, "pixel peeping" isnt bad. Your camera sucks, or you suck. Activities that reveal the extent of your failure are not wrong. They are part of life. The ugly begs people to look away. Vanity, judgement, SINNNN the ugly cry. And yet their face remains horrifying.

The talentless painter begs you stand further back
The failed musician hands out earplugs
The incompetent sculptor will only mount things on the tallest pedestals
And other absurdities from the world of digital photography

>>4389571
was that ending but supposed to be poetry? because that sucked ass
hope your photos are better than your words because you're really bad at this.

>>4389572
No sloppy prose

Sorry you think the standard zoom feature of a pc is evil because your camera is cheap asian ewaste. Maybe if you werent dumb you wouldnt have to rage against higher resolutions like those of film.

Have you considered shutting up and accepting your place as a taker of low resolution photos? You arent entitled to a world where whatever you cant attain is bad. you arent the main character. You arent being wronged or taken from. The only detractor is the whiny geartard crying PIXEL PEEPER! BAD! whenever someone witnesses how shit his digital toy is lol

People who have a problem with so called pixel peeping are the photography equivalent of uggos who wish attractive women would stop wearing makeup and start wearing hijabs to level the playing field

/p/ really is full of hipster dorks holy fuck lmoa

>>4389573
Oh no, i totally lost this argument against some guy who wont post a photo to prove me wrong. Nobody cares go cry about how i wont buy a leica and spend 6gorgilion on a lense somewhere else im gonna keep enjoying shooting photos and going hiking no matter how bad they are.

>>4389498
Anyway, to answer OPs question i think the image size is determined by what the 4chan server can support
people upload thousands of photos everyday and avatarfags include one in every post. that data adds up. Gotta cut for space somewhere

File: IMG_9958.jpg (80 KB, 780x1024)

80 KB JPG

>>4389575
future starbuck baristas

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	780
Image Height	1024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4389576
>muh leica 6 gorillion 20k
Hyperbole is the brand of a loser
We already established that less than $50 mogs most digislug toys

Imagine a fujifag begging his phone using friend to stop zooming in
And then the phonechad reveals his secret
>I can zoom in all i want with my film scans. problem?

>>4389578
>Imagine a fujifag begging his phone using friend to stop

i dont use fuji. This shit is golden
geartards at full seethe when someone comes in and says just have fun with it

>>4389579
Fun is what failed artists have when they cant have success, pyjama boy. Call it comfy next. Extra points for "vibes"!

>>4389581
you're already a failed artist
you ended up on 4chan of all places a succesful artist wouldnt even dream of coming on this website in a million years.
Let alone a socially successful person.
Continue copeing as you sit silently in a corner at your university poetry slam. where people only clap because they dont wanna be called into the deans office for hurting your feelings

>>4389584
Oh you define artistic success in terms of finances and trust fund kid/money launderer adjacency

That’s cute. I’ll remember that when I’m in slovakia next year

>>4389586
good for you.
I do a shit ton with my time there is a 100% chance im barely gonna remember this interaction one year from now let alone in a few months. But whatever helps you sleep at night.
i also never mentioned money but you bringing it up ties in perfectly to geartards thinking you need to spend thousands to have fun with anything and that applied to any irl hobbyist board

>>4389588
>rambling about prices again
We already established cheap film gear will alleviate your “PUT ON A MASK, U PRETTY FUCK!” complex and desire to suppress the photo quality of the entire board because your digital camera sucks.

You’ve really talked about nothing but money and how bad it is that people have nicer cameras than you. And you think posting on the undeground makes someone a failure. You know that trust fundy adjacency is another word for "in a major gallery"? Only sellouts shoot for that lol l2art

>>4389500
Thank you for saying it.

>>4389589
cool

>>4389592
K enjoy your digarbage but dont pretend wherever you stopped short is the ceiling of creative utility

>>4389564
Like goddamn locusts.

Or Californians.

>>4389538
Can’t wait till his job is replaced by self-driving trucks lmao

Nobody needs more than 5mb

>>4389623
An upvote for you, kind sir!

File: 1730842256583715.jpg (81 KB, 1280x1530)

81 KB JPG

>>4389498
Because filesize != image quality
Even a 7680 x 4320 photo (8k) can be brought under 2MB easily with sufficent JPEG compression. Depending on how complex the photo is, that could be acheived with as little as JPEG-90 and 4:4:2 chroma subsampling. You don't lose anything from that kind of compression, and even if you went so far as JPEG-80 and 4:2:2, you'd still in 95% of cases not see any image degredation.

That's without even discussing resizing, which if you halved the res (which you should do thanks to BAYERBULLSHIT) that would not only cut down on the filesize but still have a 4k image. And to boot, most photos aren't viewed at such high resolutions.

So basically, your shitty huge filesize is just a sign of you being unable to compress and/or resize.

>>4389500
>t. poorfag with a data cap

>>4389498
>300x300 141KB image
>more than enough to show what needs to be shown

Your turn to be put in the sticky, anon

The limit should be 50 MB and 7000 px

>>4389621
What? So he'll have more time to travel and shitpost?

>>4389500
silence obese trucker tripfag, real anons are speaking

>>4389500
Not everyone here as abysmal dogshit as you at taking photos.

>>4390241
>>4390103
>>4389667
>>4389513
>>4389504
>>4389536

k then, show the class a photo YOU made that is so good you need more than 5mb worth of resolution to view.

>>4390282
Don't try and turn the tables asshole,
you made a claim
you are the one who's got something to prove

>>4390282
At first glance you seem a manchild locked into the mentality that you must earn toys by impressing your parents, contrary to the reality where working adults just get what they purchase. And yet, despite this leftist moral act over jpeg artifacts, you are a horrid consumerist sitting on a mountain of nikon ewaste in gross excess of what any actual photographer would need, and questioning if you even deserve a camera is a common question after seeing your consistently amateurish snapshits and lack of improvement. You accumulate shitty equipment 9000x faster than you acquire photographic skill.

Perhaps the true mentality on display is that you have bought so much shitty unwanted camera gear that you now feel insecure and threatened when other people can achieve higher quality results than the mountain of f mount ewaste that done ate your meager disposable income

File: dt_DSCF3765.jpg (3.47 MB, 3048x1883)

3.47 MB JPG

>>4390282
You should check you insulin pump, bro.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:05 12:49:01
Exposure Time	1/300 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	8.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3048
Image Height	1883
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	On
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Auto
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: durr.jpg (23 KB, 446x477)

23 KB JPG

>>4390291
>omg I can heckin fail to apply compression to my shitty birb snapshit! Checkmate atheists!

>>4390288
as a rule: all muh pixel peep/photos should be 500x fags are coping poorfag digislugs mad that other people are taking the same shitty pictures but have the extra quality over them, and therefore contribute something of more value and use
>NO YOU CANT HAVE SOMETHING OVER ME THAT COSTS MONEY THIS ISNT FAIR MONEY SHOULDNT MATTER! ACTUALLY YOU SUCK NO ONE LIKES YOU! REEEEEEEEEEEEE
The painful reality that successful working adults are basically always better than NEETs and poors

>>4390291
heron schizo, how are ya bro?

>>4390288
>adults get what they pay for
25mb upload limit for pass holders when?

>>4390294
that's not even it.
anons are just tired of you derailing threads because we didnt conform to your beliefs so you can have a happy stim.
I dont really care about pixel peeping if a photos looks good and has some downsides ill say it.
but if someone does not have the goal of doing great photography you're wasting your time throwing a tantrum on a anonymous chinese basket weaving forum with a subsection for photographing baskets.

>>4390297
There's good discussion about gear and then there's being a complete faggot who just spews shit because you're trying hard to fit in and make a name for yourself on an anonymous image board
which is cringey as hell

>>4390297
Schizo nonsense, too many twitter buzzwords

>>4390298
Sugar has become the most hated poster on /p/, terrible pictures lots of even worse gear

>>4390299
you responded to me twice.
One disagreeing with me and the other agreeing
pick one, retard, this shit why we cant have nice things

>>4390300
>you responded to me responding to myself
holy schizo

>>4390301
you fucking newfags think you should only post once in every thread.
r/4chan and twitter screenshots have had irrepairable consequences on this website

>>4390302
>if i cant reply to myself i can only post once per thread
holy schizo

>>4390282
I wasn't part of this conversation, but the only occasion I lean towards 5MB file sizes instead of normal 1-2 MB is portraits of large groups of people. I suppose streetfags also like to check out the expressions of people in a crowd.
Someday JPEGXL will become the norm.

>>4390294
There was literally a guy on /rpt/ that bought a used camera and a gearschizo started seething that it was taking good hires pictures. Your post is pure cope for dropping $5k

>>4390309
Nice fanfic

My camera wasnt even $1k but its still too much MUH PIXEL PEEP for people like sugar and moop (same difference desu)

>>4390309
No, anon. Some guy was taking terribly framed and badly edited pictures of the birds near his backyard feeder and got laughed at for buying a big ass d810 just to admit to cropping the shit out of every photo, an admission that he couldnt compose.

He essentially got laughed at for having to pixel peep to see the subject rather than it being a secondary activity like reading signs in the background of a photo of an area that has been demolished or turned into a replacementfugee camp

>>4390318
>>4390315
post your photos and i will change my mind

File: NIK_7209.jpg (4.65 MB, 4690x3128)

4.65 MB JPG

>>4390318
Lmfao still butthurt I see, hope you enjoy this pic too :^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	D3400
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.11
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300
Vertical Resolution	300
Image Created	2024:12:05 18:53:05
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm

>>4390324
i gotta get me one of these

>>4390324
How deep did you crop this one gearschizo?

Pixel peeping is a secondary form of art appreciation not the default state of a photo.

>>4390329
im gonna start pixel peeping prints with binoculars

>>4390329
If you have to ask... :^)
>>4390330
400% pixel prospector chads

>>4390318
I legitimately do not understand people who pay for 50 million pixels only to edit out 40 million of them

>>4390338
that's this entire board in a nutshell

>>4390341
At least resizing a bit for a 4chan post is temporary and its delivered to unimportant losers

Cropping to compose is forever

File: 1137-9353-2.jpg (3.7 MB, 7209x3192)

3.7 MB JPG

>>4390288
>>4390286

these are not pictures, you failed. tl;dr

>>4390291

This is a picture, based compact digishitposter. 0/10 snapshit though

no-photo trolls BTFO with no recovery, good day sirs.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Photographer	KM Studios
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	892
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:12:21 18:22:33
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4390338
It's called cropping, learn to do that someday you retarded prick

>>4390522
jfc i thought this was an iphone

File: 1730813673654966.gif (175 KB, 1500x1000)

175 KB GIF

>>4390530
what? Cropping 80% of your sensor size out and increasing your noise and shitting up your res because you can't be fucked spending $500 on a telephoto zoom and learning how to actually take photos?
Go back >>/reddit/

>>4390537
>buying a zoom
Just get closer retard (soory for the insult btw)

>>4390539
Nah it's fine, I deserve being called slurs at a minimum. Also you're right, but after a certian point zooming with your feet is like taking a 10 minute walk instead of going from 400mm to 600mm.

>>4390543
>10 minute walk
>+200mm
Holy shit a talking snail

>>4390537
>you can't be fucked spending $500
Oh yeah, the solution is absolutely gearfagging more rather than using TOYHWY
You should go back to breddit, bitch-faced ape freak

>>4390551
>wdym bro, I just take all my photos with this 10mm fisheye because it's the one I have with me.
>$500? Woah calm down gearfag, you're not allowed to buy things
You sound like a incredibly poor person. Perhaps selling the copper wire inside your ethernet cables would be a good move so you can save the world the bandwidth

File: dt_DSCF3875.jpg (4.42 MB, 3456x2606)

4.42 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:07 18:04:54
Exposure Time	1/4 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Landscape Mode
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-1.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3456
Image Height	2606
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Night Scene
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Night Scene
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	Out of Focus
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: dt_DSCF3874.jpg (1.18 MB, 1448x2343)

1.18 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:07 18:20:28
Exposure Time	1/3 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Landscape Mode
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1448
Image Height	2343
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Night Scene
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Night Scene
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	Out of Focus
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: dt_DSCF3877.jpg (2.86 MB, 3456x2606)

2.86 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix E900
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:12:07 18:26:46
Exposure Time	1/5 sec
F-Number	f/3.9
Exposure Program	Landscape Mode
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/3.9
Brightness	-0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	15.10 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3456
Image Height	2606
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Night Scene
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Macro Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Night Scene
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>4390554
You went to extreme points, sounds to me you are either mentally challenged or jewish. Please stop posting.

File: IMG_8011.gif (1.78 MB, 1080x1080)

1.78 MB GIF

>>4390537
crop deez nutz in your mouth

>>4390522
terrible composition
horrible colors
putrid contrast

>>4390622
I ain't clicking on that and getting a seizure bruh