even normies are waking up to how bad m43 is now, dont let these hack fucks shoot your wedding day with the professional equivalent of a smartphone camera
>>4389679>reddit screenshot threadgo back
>>4389679I would have done the same, or maybe handed them my phase one camera with IQ350 back and asked them to do their best with my real camera.>>4389680>t. Seething micro fool turder
>screenshots bait post from redditget better bait faggot
>>4389679>its just as good guise!Lol the results always say otherwisem43 only looks good for dpreviews test page (they cheat btw) in real life it is awful
>so triggered by the word "foolframer" immediately makes mft generalThanks it's been a minute
Somehow I don't believe this actually happened.
>>4389691Fe2fucker got married to huskyfag. You didn't hear the news?
>>4389692I don't follow the local lore, sorry. I have seen that namefag fe2fucker though.
>>4389692We did and we're taking turns giving the local kennel an aids epidemic.
>two /p/ gearfags getting gay married>reddit photographer arrives with his oly>/p/ fags seethe about him trying to shoot their fabulous wedding with lesser gear>reddit autist tries to defend himself, spaghetti flying from his pocketsThis is literally just two different schools of autism fighting with one another.If the story in the cap is true (which it isn't), then everyone involved needs to kill themselves.
>>4389679Seems like a weak bait on plebbit, people are signing contracts for that kind of stuff, didn't they saw his work before?Also only good OM-1 is picrel
i have m43 and ff, they both have their pros and cons, but shooting a wedding on m43 is beyond fucking retarded,
>>4389692Huskyfag is his deadnameHe’s fully transitioned to dog hair negatives
>>4389752Doghair debunked, rebunked, and the redebunked this theory. His real name is Ken rockwell, aka cAnon, aka cinefag.
>>4389755Look in /dst/. Doghair has an s24 ultra.
>>4389757Only a retard or huskyfaglet would think that's huskyfag's dog. Which one are you?
>>4389762>also a husky>blue eyes>asymmetrical black nose stripe>phones failure censoring it for deniabilityIt was all one guy
>>4389763Even with that blurry picture it's beyond obvious they're different dogs. Did huskyfag btfo you in the m43 thread, perchance? I reckon the only reason for such an obvious denial of reality is because he made you seethe so hard that he now lives rent free in your head.
>>4389774Lol look at this denial
fool turds shooters are the holocaust deniers of photography
>>4389782Stating objective facts is not denial.Huskyfag bullied the m43cel so badly that he made him sell his camera for bitcoin and there hasn't been an m43 general since. It was a remarkable spectacle.
how dare them for not wanting bog standard crop sensor f/16 equivalent shots
>>4389788>muh equivalenceOnly applies to depth of focus sadly, does not include rendering or ISO in reality or fool framers wouldnt be mogged by fuji GFX GODS 24/7>>4389787Shut up, huskyfag/doghair
Just learn to use a flash retards, with proper flash technique you can shoot a wedding even on a 6mp shitter and no one would bat an eye.
>>4389800>Please turn the flashing light off. it’s disruptive>but my sensor is->Listen to the man with your paycheck>but with available light these are just snapshots, not ar->Leave the venue. Now.
>>4389793>Btfo so hard she's become delusional.
>>4389810I’m not the one claiming their alter ego killed micro four thirds or whateverI bet if I check /an/ i’ll find you still posting the husky
>>4389822Caught you>>>/an/4912874Brushing your dog backyards doesnt make them a different dog btw
>>4389822Go ahead and try. Only morons and seething m43 tards believe it.
>>4389824Woaaaaaah huskyfags dog doesn't have heterochromia!
>>4389679the state of me not giving a shit
>>4389827Neither does that one. Thats red eye. The other photo in /dst/ shows two blue eyes. Ya got caught. Your split personality larp was never funny and now it’s time to let it quietly fade into the sands of time.
>>4389830Incorrect. Surely you will not deny reality again.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S24 UltraCamera SoftwareS928U1UES3AXI1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)23 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4000Image Height3000Image OrientationBottom, Right-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:11:29 03:03:36Exposure Time1/15 secF-Numberf/1.7Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/1.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length6.30 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width4000Image Height3000Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDHK0XLQE00SM
>>4389832>>>/an/4912898Terrible shoop huskyfagStick to taking photos of spiderwebs on excessively large film
>>4389839>Denies reality yet againOh lmao. The poor m43 guy is still seething. This is hilarious to me. Thanks.
https://desuarchive.org/an/thread/4620526/#q4621785
>>4389842The reality that you brushed your poor dog backwards for a 4chan shitpost has yet to be denied.
>>4389847You're a blind idiot, so the glaring differences between the two dogs are lost on you. Go look >>4389846If you want to think we are the same person as some weird cope then go ahead. It makes no difference aside from providing additional entertainment for me.
>>4389846>no wonder they stopped faking moon landings -husky/doghair/cANON:o
>but i brushed the dog backwards and edited the ai smears. how can they still tell?shoulda thought twice before confirming it was heather
>>4389850I've been trying to tell you that everything leads back to Ken rockwell aka cAnon.>>4389854Everyone is wrong occasionally, buddy. It's going to be okay.
>>4389857Yeah larping with your relatives dog was wrong but its in the past now
>>4389861Anyone who even briefly looks at the thread I posted sees you as a complete lunatic. Entertain ms further please. Why would huskyfag only ever post using his Nikon mirrorless Z whatever camera, and doghair only ever post pics/scan film with a canon 5dm3? Don't you think doghair would want to use the better camera to scan his big film?
>doghairfag finally makes good on his promise to buy a camera with epic exif - a fuji gfx large format - after failing to use his huskyfag incarnation to destroy micro four thirds>with a G mount body and the triforce of ISO in hand he completes his metamorphosis and changes from the 1v/5d shooting cANON to the dark lord gANON, the embodiment of hatred and malice for smaller sensorsOnly a hero with a pure heart and the master camera, also known as the panasonic lumix g9ii, and the triforce of aperture equivalence, can defeat him
>>4389862>i used my dead relatives inheritance to buy a second camera for my epic trolling. bet you’re confused now huh?Damn dude you have a lot of cameras
>>4389863Lol. I like funny head canon. Personally I have a great temptation to rent a high end phase one back and take a bunch of snapshits of my dog to troll everyone. Not really sure it's worth spending 1k dollars on tho. Maybe when I find a good deal on a non-tethered only 50-100 MP medium format back for my view camera I'll get it. 2-3k can get you something pretty good these days...For now I just take a picture of my 8x10 sheets and that's good enough.
>>4389864This just shows you're seething, and avoiding my question. Try again.
>>4389866Why would the guy who repeatedly calls scans worthless previews and calls the OVF the last stand of photographic integrity mill through rented MILCs to troll and never use them to scan film properly?Its over for this lame joke. Time to accept defeat and let it die.
>>4389868Wait you think I'm canon as well? Lmao. You are funny.
>>4389784So they are speaking the truth and kinda redpilled?
wtf? is dxomark lying or is the sharpest m43 lens really this bad? t. >$3500 into this system...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.G991USQSEGXJ4Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1048Image Height1409
>>4391192dxomark is full of shit, you can't compare between different systemsTake that sigma 60mm f2.8 for instance https://www.dxomark.com/sigma-60mm-f-2-8-dn-a-mft-and-nex-mount-lens-reviews-high-performance-accessible-price/
most photos are going to be raped by MMS and/or facebook compression and then viewed on a samsung phone with a cracked screen. and not excluding wedding photos, but especially wedding photos. in fact, the most viewed photos of the event will come from the bride's great aunt's cellphone. the wedding photographer's work will be looked at a handful of times at best.
>>4391200nooo you're supposed to dunk on the format and tell my i'm stupid for spending so much on soft lenses...>>4391208so true
>>4391234The average m43 user has a humiliation fetish. It all makes sense now.
>>4391238yes perfect thank you[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeOM Digital SolutionsCamera ModelOM-1Camera Softwaredarktable 4.8.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:11:10 12:29:45Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias2 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length40.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height1999RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4391248Nice pic but birb so tiny
>>4391248Phone pic tier quality.
>>4391341It is easily worse than a phone pic, just look at the smartphone general. Awful tonality and visible noise zoomed out.
>>4391263It's a garbage snapshit taken with a $2000 piece of shit by a scam sushi company
>>4389679Which one of you faggots wrote that, 8/10 glorious bait
>>4391341>>4391356I want you to know these comments made me put a full frame camera in my cart but I've come to realize my photography doesn't deserve it. If anything I should be using worse. Thank you.
>>4391892>i almost considered getting a girlfriend but i realized i dont deserve it>if anything i should be the girlfriendthe anti-gear gearfag mentality
>>4391895why wouldnt everyone want to be the girlfriend?
>>4391895wow i never thought of it that way...
