Sigma Sony bros...https://www.sigma-global.com/en/news/2024/12/19/010781/
>crappy lens gets fixed for free>its still a crappy lensok?
>>4393276are sigma lenses even good? it seems like none of them outperform their g master equivalent.
>>4393317They used to be the best alternative due to price, but Tamron is now catching up and exceeding them and beating them at price.
>>4393318Isn't Tamron Nikon's first party trinity lens maker lol
>>4393319they also make non-l canon lenses (hence no weather sealing)
>>4393317Cost a fourth of a Zeiss Master and do 95% of the job, that's pretty good
>>4393317>>4393391Btw enjoy your shit color science, retard
>>4393392It's no different than the color science of a cheap 80s lens, just less fringing
>>4393319Many Sony lenses are actually made by Tamron as well. Nikon too.
>>4393479whoa is this true? source? is my g master really a Tamron?
>>4393617No. He made it up. Tamron only makes 3 low end nikkors and a shitty canon telephoto.
>>4393317They're not bad but they'll never be Tokina or Tamron.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
Unrelated but I wish I hadn't bought a fucking zoom lens for my first full frame camera. The images are flat as a fucking board and the camera + lens weighs a ton.
>>4393758you bought the wrong zoom
>>4393758Unironically FF only makes sense if you get a 40+MP body and only use very sharp primes.
>>4393798>m43shitter
>>4393798Half. Zooms are for faggots. >but the aperture equivalence f2.8 zooms are the point!!!!!Equivalence doesnt affect real life photography. Leave the house and stop shooting iso 3200 bokeh cats. More pixels can be useful if you’re having moire problems but bigger pixels have better color at high ISOs. Most 35mm was between 16 and 20mp and no one complained, jussaiyan.
