What would you recommend and why?
>>4393442 (OP)Contax C/Y for that sweet Zeiss glass M39/42 for ruski swirly bokeh Nikon F is a fudd favourite, good luck having to deal with the pre-AI, AI, and AI-S compatibility nonsense Minolta Rokkor, Olympus OM, Canon FD glass perform pretty much the same You literally can't go wrong
>>4393442I've got a helios and an mir 1b. Love them. Plan on getting a jupiter 9 at some point
Super shitumar 50 mm
>>4393442Keep film and digital seperate, the two mediums are worlds apart. You're not gonna get ''the film look" by shooting Helios on a Snoy, you'll just get a lack of sharpness, contrast, and tons of abberations.
Sears 80-200 & Vivitar are A+++
>>4393442Tokina 90mm f2.5 Macro in whichever mount should be in your set imo. It's really special.
>>4393442I'd recommend shoving them all up your filthy ass.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelNEX-3NCamera Softwaredarktable 4.8.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:18 09:29:42Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating500Brightness4.0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2736Image Height4428RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4393442>build a set of vintage lensesNobody here owns a vintage lens factory
>>4393480I don't have a goatse territory rectum, but perhaps some smaller 16mm lenses would work.
>>4393465Keep film and digital together, the two mediums complement eachother beautifully. You're gonna be able to keep the exact same shooting style while switching seamlessly between them, and as an added bonus you get 100% soul using old abacus calculated lens designs, made by people, for people, not computers.
>>4393444I would say skip FD. They're nothing special and most of them are as expensive as their EF equivalents and worse in every way. >>4393465>You're not gonna get ''the film look"Maybe not, but you might still like the results.