I have the 5D mark II with the lenses EF 100 f/2.8L macro, EF 40 f/2.8 and EF 50 f/1.8.
>>4394466info on the photo? Nice dubs
>>4394468There you go, mate![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height712Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:12:24 06:39:55
Add a 24-70 for convenience. Sell the EF 40 since it's close to the 50. Keep the 100.
>>4394471How about the 16-35 f/4?
>>4394473Good lens if you're into wide angle which doesnt seem to be the case with your current setup, though.
>>4394466think about what's limiting your creative vision and plan your shopping accordingly, otherwise get a 70-200 and shove it up your ass you retard
>>4394466Sell everythingGet a sony a7c and a 20-70 f4
>>4394466>Sell 50mm if you'd rather have a pancake and can deal with 1 1/3rd less stops of aperture>Sell 40mm if you'd rather the +1 1/3rd stop of aperture and dont care about pancake form factorThen take that $80 and buy a nice dinner for yourself, because nothing else worth buying is going to be as cheap.However,>EF 28mm f/1.8 is a decent pick for wide-angle>EF 180mm f/3.5 is a macro king if that's why you have the EF 100mm Macro, and can be fucked lugging it around.>EF 70-200 f/4 is probably worth if you'd rather have a zoom lens>EF 100-400mm if you want muh reechI'm all for prime lenses though, so my bias tells me the 28mm (or a 24mm), the 50mm and 100mm you have already all together make a well-rounded and powerful kit.
>>4394466Sell the 40 or 50 depending on what you like more, buy a 100-400 or 150-600 or whatever zooooom canon users like these days. Get more deer pics or expand to squirrels and birds.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBWhite BalanceAuto
>>4394466180mm macroLength lets it double as a substitute for the 70-200
