Post your Insta, follow others, critique each other etcI'll leave some feedback for the initial posts to get things rolling.
Why did you post your school bully, OP?
Mine is @vanbrandenburg.photographyI mainly shoot digital, but I've been shooting more film recently.
>>4395329Based, I follow you already. I like seeing your stuff come up in my feed, most stuff like that bottom middle photo would be awesome to see. You pick some really good times of day and locations for photos.
>>4395314Why dows this remind me of Borderlands?
https://www.instagram.com/clearbluewindow/Majority is digital, I have some film I still need to develop. I want to do more portraits but I'm not sure how to find models and asking friends feels awkward.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I think a lot of us here are already following each other, lol.Maybe we should comment more under our publications, even if Instagram doesn't value it.
I am probably the only one here not on IGAnd I refuse to join.
>>4395351>Turn on trip to announce to a thread that you're special and unique I have no social media either but you don't see me making a 4chan account to fuckin boast about it. You might as well make an insta, you seem to have the right mindset.
>>4395329Been following you since the last time you posted in the Instagram Thread. >>4395332Your latest post (DEGkKywyV9W) - nailed the lighting, botched the perspective a little. Tag your locations when posting architecture, people will want to know what they're looking at. CIypxPKpfPq is your best photo by far.I'm https://www.instagram.com/ozren.c/ and I'll be here all week.
>>4395331>Why dows this remind me of Borderlands?Because you are too ignorant and intellectually stunted to analyze it and decipher the obviousness of why
>>4395353Trip Derangement Syndrome, get help
>>4395358KYS, contrarian.
>>4395351>redditspacing>ego tripfaggingSomeone should hammer you down fag, but then again someone should also do the same to those who doxx themselves in these threads
>>4395360Forgot to drop your trip there faggot. I'm not a contrarian IG is just dumb clout chasing shit its a high school popularity contest>>4395361Get fucked no one asked for your opinion no photo
>>4395362The irony is you're also displaying high school clout seeking behavior by having a trip. You're calling people nophotos while hoping everyone remembers your super special pics so you don't have to post any either. You're sitting at the loser's table making snide remarks about the cool kids so that you can make yourself seem cool too. The reason you don't use social media is either because you're scared of some boogeyman or because you know that you'll be lost in the sea of other unremarkable photographers on that platform. So you post on 4chan and shit on everyone who doesn't reverse you here, where most people are passing through and don't give a shit anyway but by the only objective measure (getting (you)s) you're doing great because people want to tell you off.
>>4395351Great so this thread isn't for you, attention whore tripfag. No one asked, no one cares you obese fucking TRUCKER.
>>4395351Your photos would probably be too low of a standard for Instagram anyway.
>>4395332I enjoy the stylehttps://www.instagram.com/web_and_photos/[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerLloydImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4395329>>4395332>>4395355Been following you guys since the last thread, super cool stuffhttps://www.instagram.com/604connor/
>>4395362Start posting photos anytime you piece of shit
>>4395330Thanks for the kind words Anon. I'd love to take more pics like that bottom one, it was on expired AGFA XRG 100, had this faded look the whole time, I loved it. >>4395332You've got a wonderful eye for composition, I'm looking forward to seeing more of your work.>>4395345Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.>>4395355Been following you too, those city shots are great.>>4395367I like the subject matter Anon. Very interested to see more of your photos.>>4395388Really nice stuff Anon. You've got a good eye for colour and subject.
>>4395355>Your latest post (DEGkKywyV9W) - nailed the lighting, botched the perspective a little. Interesting, what should I have done different? Should I have gone for a lower perspective or is it a lens distortion issue?I really like the colors in yours, that bottom middle photo on that collage is excellent. I love the sky color. Any tips on how you edit your photos?>>4395367That top row is insane, both for subjects and how they were taken. I'm really interested to know the story of that top middle photo.>>4395388Some really cool locations in these. The colors feel a little too muted for me, but that's completely subjective. That middle and bottom row are my favorites by far.
>>4395411>Interesting, what should I have done different? Should I have gone for a lower perspective or is it a lens distortion issue?Symmetry and preservation of verticals, IMO. >I really like the colors in yours, that bottom middle photo on that collage is excellent. I love the sky color. Any tips on how you edit your photos?Thanks. I use gradients on my skies a lot, mostly radial, sometimes linear. Push the blues towards the green a bit and that's mostly it. Canon's color science does the rest. Sometimes, when I shoot architecture during golden hour, I'll add some purple into the shadows as well and crush the blacks a bit.
>>4395420I think I see what you mean, thanks for the tip. I'll look more into perspective, I guess I just tried a little too hard for it to look realistic rather than artistic. It's been a tough balance for me admittedly, considering people tend to not like over edited photos.>Push the blues towards the green a bit and that's mostly it. Cool, I've give that a shot on some future photos and see how it goes. Though I'm guessing you keep that gradient on just the sky and don't let it affect the other blues in the image?> I'll add some purple into the shadows as well and crush the blacks a bit.Same. I want to do more crushed blacks but people always make it out to be the ultimate sin in photos, so I've almost never done it. I'm sitting on a few photos I haven't posted for that reason (pic related). Maybe I just don't know enough about the technique.
>>4395422>Though I'm guessing you keep that gradient on just the sky and don't let it affect the other blues in the image?Yes, I use masking. >I want to do more crushed blacks but people always make it out to be the ultimate sin in photosDepends on the scene, I guess.
>>4395424>Depends on the scene, I guess.Fair, I can see that. How is that photo above for it? Overcrushed?
>>4395424Generally speaking, crushing the blacks is a 4chan approved hobby in all boards other than /p/. However,>If the crushed blacks are not your main subject, it matters less>If you're intentionally going for a silhouetted foreground / background then it's completely fine>If the alternative is blowing highlights on something more important, like your subject, it's also completely fineDon't worry about the faggots screeching about DR on this board, they havent shot anything with backlighting and/or shoot exclusively street """photos"""
>>4395465>and/or shoot exclusively street """photos"""One of the few instances where crushing blacks is good (in photos) so wrong, still i agree with the post
>>4395465DR is the single most important thing. Film basically had 20 fucking stops. Slide had 8 and everyone hated it. I used to own an mft and yes, DR matters a shitton and the only cope is dont take the photo or crush the shadows. Even FF digital is worse than film (blown highlights shift fucking pink)I can expose negatives +5 stops on full frame thats solid white but on film its cleaner shadows and the highlights dont blow. engineering nerds will call me wrong because ackshually dynamic range is the signal to noise ratio of the normalized image but fuck them, digital cameras have ass DR.
>>4395411>>4395403ThanksThe middle Photo is a Detail shot from a large fountain in Nuernberg with a lot of different scenes called the Ehekarussell.just like in the first one I was there at the right time to find a angle that puts you in the scene with the sun in the back
>>4395482Film negatives have better highlight detail than digital. But shadows lift much better on digital than on film.
>>4395482>DR is the single most important thing.Found the gearfag. Post photos or gtfo.
>>4395496Sorry I didnt know I was the gearfag for believing a $10 praktica with a $5 50mm f1.8 takes better photos than your $1699 x-t5 with its $1000 35mm f1.2 lm wr L g master S line. You don’t deserve to see my work. All gearfag means to you is anything that says your crappy digital camera is a scam. Typical digital consoomer. They cant even define hylicism without it being about defending their slop.
>>4395527>has to resort to foolji worm aps-c comparisonI agree film is better than that trash, even disposable cameras with plastic lenses.
>>4395534Even worse, $5000 canikony blob
I take lots of photos when I go on road trips. Would instagram be a good dumping ground for them or am I better off with some other platform? It's a pain in the ass to share them at the moment.
All 35mm, only been doing this for about a year, any criticism/advice welcome. Love these threads, some of you guys are pretty good. https://www.instagram.com/swagmasterriles[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1545Image Height1024
>>4395546Instagram is nice for dumping. As a bonus I'd say that a lot of people have it, so as a benefit you can just hand it out as a proxy for contact info. >>4395603Really nice start for a year Anon. Hope you enjoyed your time in Amsterdam!
>>4395314>Post your InstaNo. I refuse to post on Instagram because the platform doesn't offer revenue share with the creators akin to YT & X/twitter.And no, I would not expect my Insta to be a cash cow or anything. I just won't provide Instagram with material without merit based compensation.
>>4395627ok
my film snapshits, i get a "good" one every now and then https://instagram.com/comfyfilmclub[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 8.00.011 (220309)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:10:25 14:35:25Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4395607Thank you, I’ve definitely had my share of bad photos but it’s nice to know I’m on the right track, at least. I love Amsterdam, that trip was my fourth time and the first time not being broke. Had an apartment in the middle of the city for a week, got to be there for King’s Day, it was a blast, I didn’t want to go home by the end of it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1280Image Height849
>>4395546IG is great for it, but just try to pick your best photos.
>>4395314https://www.instagram.com/cesfhiil/recently started shooting again because of recent visits to /p/ lol.especially with threads like these because I just get to browse people's pictures here.
https://www.instagram.com/lushlife75/I'm presently trying to do more portraits and getting good results with my flash.>>4395403>Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.I'm interested in reading what kind of project you have in mind.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerLouis-Philippe BalambaImage-Specific Properties:
>>4396163That middle right train pic is pure kino
>>4396230I was half drunk when I saw her and I thought the same thing, lol.
>>4395403>Yeah there definitely is a well established /p/ network at this point. It'd honestly be cool to start publishing a zine or something like that.i'd be into that, sounds very cool and pretty fun.it'd also increase how many people actually see our photos
instagram.com/crimsonqunnyKinda new to photography, I shoot random things mostly street and portraits.
>>4396450shoot more train shit.huwag ka mahiya lol :)
>>4395627lol
>>4395627insta is legit shitif i want to show a friend a photo from last month and they dont have a facebook account due to being sane and intelligent, i have to download and text it and hope they dont use androidor just use flickr.
>everyone has a gf and posts them on their instayou fuckers are making me depressed
>>4396509Sure thing, hopefully I won't get scolded by the guards lol
>>4395627instagram is a cesspool of shit, you can get ban for nothing in the same time there are accounts posting rekt, animal abuse, onlyfans roasties pretending breastfeeding to show tits (breastfeeding, cancer awareness and protest are excluded from censorship there so they pretend to feed the doll as 'instructional video'). Meanwhile I've got 3 bans for literally nothing, had full bio with my name, architecture pictures, no skin, no political shit, just 'not following community guidelines'. You can appeal but it gets you nothing, those accounts have now been deleted for a year, stil cannot use that name to register new one.BUT instagram is where ad agencies are, and having more than 10k followers in most lines of business place you in 'influencer' box and you start to get deals. That's where money from instagram is.
>>4396615Its ads. All social media is are ads disguised as content. Engagement bait if you will.So its no wonder non advertisers are being pushed off their platforms, either via sneaky bans or algorithms hiding your content. This is why I like /pee/, no algo (yet)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1280Image Height758Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4396617>Engagement baitHoly FUCK he said the thing>Pic rel
>>4396625:A)
>>4395981It's a wonderful city, but a shame how bad the housing market is, otherwise I'd love to live there.>>4396163>I'm interested in reading what kind of project you have in mind.I'd think a zine with contributions from Anons both in the form of photos and articles would be nice. Maybe some photo competitions included?>>4396263I think so too. For all the complaining and nophotos, /p/ is a pretty good community I'd argue.>>4396450Nice start Anon. You'll improve quickly if you keep taking that many photos. Looking forward to seeing more. >>4396598It should give you hope. If some of us stuck on this site can manage to get gfs then we all can.
