previous >>4467976
>>4470709
>>4470709>>4470710Image quality so low it actually hurts to look atIf this horrendous blur effect had an artistic application this aint it cheif
>>4470729I'm sorry let me try again. I don't know what I'm doing ;_;Any tips are appreciated
>>4470709This has to be one of the most infuriating images ever posted here
>>4470747It's good you matched it with one of the most infuriating comments
>>4470747W-why
>>4470729>>4470747dunking on noobs is seriously low-hanging fruit
>>4470709>>4470710good morning sirs
>>4470775not much contrast or sharpness leftI would try and think of a way to get more light into the scene instead of raising ISOmaybe flashbrighter and faster glassIBIS with slow shutter speeds
>>4470709>>4470710>>4470729There's no such thing as a bad train pic.
>>4470788Kbec?
>>4470798Its paris
October soon
Appalachian fog
>>4470808That's a fucking awesome atmosphere, good color scheme too. What do you think of this 4x3 crop?
Took these on a roadtrip. how would you improve it
>>4470815
>>4470815>>4470816
>>4470817>>4470816>>4470815
>>4470736This board is useless. You will get no decent advice. Unless it's from me..........
>>4470736>>4470819Adjust WBLevel horizonFlip to so you get more of the dang train and less of the ohw
>>4470806this looks like a certain photographer’s workidr his name tho :/ but he was in aperture mag recently
lil bug
>>4470833you missed focus be mindful of the minimum focus distance of your lens
>>4470828could you be thinking of todd hido?>>4470808hello, kino department?
>>4470786thanks for the feedbackI was at 1/200 with auto ISO, he was out in the sun but then ducked into the shadows and it's hard to adjust through the housing plus them snappers are unpredictable, ISO was still only 2000 but he'd stirred up some silt. i just liked the background on that one the best
>>4470842How do you review your Photos? Or edit them
LUMIX S5, SIGMA Art 20mm
>>4470774Imbalance and asymmetry for starters
>>4470857i have rawtherapee. mostly i shoot caverns which are really low light with full sunlight blasting through but if interesting animals are around i take pics of them.
>>4470747It looks like micro four thirds doesn't it. Even after he turns on sharpening.>>4470744This looks like mft too. The pukey dull magenta poisoned greens are most of it, and it looks like a PNS after being sharpened and NRd in photoshop. MFT cameras all have a heavy green tint and get automatic magenta in white balance (whether the editor hides this fact or not) that makes greens dull and yellow and makes all the colors weird because adding magenta to cancel out the green just leaves a void where the actual color would have been, most noticeable on green. But you can see some purpling in the shadows too.
>>4470930Once seen it can not be unseen
>>4470946
>>4470710go back and take it again :) change the aperture to make the foreground text and the train the most in focus elements
>>4470712sucker for a birch tree, really like the colour palette on this with the pinks of the heatherthink about cropping the pic a bit so its easier to see the subject without a massive screen
>>4470833that would have been awesome if it was in focus! would liked to have seen a nice sharp line and details on the lil buggy boi
>>4470709definitely go back and retry this, try a lower angle and a narrower aperture to get all that detail in focus.guessing this was handheld so it got blurred up a bit but i think its cool and you should try coming back to it for sure!
what you think of this Kodachrome picture control (graffiti mural for colors)
another, this one kind of worries me with how washed out it is
>>4470978Of the last 6, this is the only one that's worth looking at.
>>4470930If you ever took a minute from seething at the internet, you'd know that sunsets tint everything yellow
When did /p/ remove exif? It's been a bit for me. >>4470924Chef's kiss. I'd be jealous if there wasn't so much noise. Good stuff. (Still jealous)>>4470841Colors really pop on this, well done. >>4470733Feel like this is a neat spot but this photo doesn't sell it at all. >>4470710>>4470736Decent shot. First export was just low res. Don't stress about it.
Helene swoll the South French Broad river
>recenti refoose
>>4470756>>4470775>>4470808>>4470931>>4471005I like these
>>4471025is this homosassa through the glass?
>>4470930What are you? The fucking mft Gestapo? Go out and take some pictures. It's pretty pathetic what you are trying to do here
>>4471035What a goat!>>4471039That small pan really does it. Great shot>>4471068Incredible sharpness. Very much like the composition too.
ooooh fuck me the floppy disk camera went HARD this morning
>>4471076
>>4471077also it was just a beautiful morning in general, rode the bike to the beach and got a new personal best climbing up the stupid fuckshit nonsense massively steep hill
>>4471049Through the glass, yes, but homosassa, I don't know. Some kind of sea animal.
cow
>>4471117I like cows. They're just big, lovable creatures.
>>4471130I like cows too anon. Here, have another.
>>4471081HELL YEAHNow we're cooking!
>>4471117cow guy? more cows pls
>>4471057nice work, the pan, gave it life.what camera and settings? I'm trying to get better at moving subjects but all my stuff sucks atm
>>4471144woops, i meant >>4471039whats going on here though? >>4471057
>>4471142is there another cow guy on /p/? Been a while since I've posted here.I didn't get a ton of photos of the cows I was happy with, but I think I have a couple more.
>>4471156Not a cow guy, but cows are good, like big dogs.Will keep an eye out for some and report back.
>>4471145Just the casual Heroine shot during a sunday afternoon photo walk. Are you not doing that?
