Pizza EditionPreviously on RPT --> >>4472577
>>4474524Love the lighting, colours and framing. Would have been great if her outfit fit the scenery better
Despite being a blurry mess, I think it looks cool
>>4474514>>4474515Haha love it, anon. Very fun.
>>4474620Are you kidding me bro? This is terrible.>blown out skies>cut off police car>low resolution subject>>4474578This is the worst post-processing you could have possibly applied. >sharpening halos all over the background There's actually less detail in the feathers and wood grain than if you hadn't sharpened all the way to 100, and you didn't crop out the one-fifth of that post on the left-hand side. This is seriously so bad.>>4474569>still life but two-thirds of the props are out-of-focusCongratulations, you're retarded. Shallow depth-of-field made your photo worse.>>4474529Good.
>>4474631Danke. >>4474675Based Australian suburbia shot. Where's the V8 Ute though. Shoulda gone wider and got the whole house in frame.Bruh these minis were shot at f/8 and look at this lack of DoF. Blah
>>4474709Great shades of blue. The horizon and sky look very vast. Very nice shot even if it's "simple"
Cows for your own eyes
Went for a walk innawoodssnapped some shits1/6>>4474753based cowposter
>>44747822/6
>>44747833/6
>>44747844/6
>>44747855/6
>>44747866/6
>>4474787bonus snap of my shibber
>>4474787nice
>>4474788This furball is allergic to staying still
>>4474753based
>>4474791mine will only sit still if I have treats, which luckily I did, my mums pup on the otherhand doesn't like to sit still for more than a second.
>>4474794Snapshit of mine before he took off to find the pond
A house and a dream
Trying out a surrealist color look
Does it look film enough
Color, Light, Ambiance
Trying to be at least visually pleasing
Can't tell if this horse is boring or not
Not sure where I was going with this one but I like that the mountains look fake
>>4474863And I want to lick that sky gradient
>>4474842This one is so good
>spent so much time farting around with focusing that I didn't realise my shutter speed was 1/80 until after I took the photoDon't know if I like it or not. The lens flare is kinda neat but unintended.
>>4474842It doesn't really look surreal to me, it looks like 98% of all modern Hollywood movies and everybody who wants the "film look"
>>4474856I like this a lot. The image is pretty busy/messy, but I still like it.
>>4474842Dude nice photo looks stunning btw how did you get that feel? And like what software did u use?
>>4474989Nta. The Orange & Teal speciale. Youtubers in shambles.
>>4474989https://we.tl/t-oLIbCNck3bwetransfer, no virus, link up for 3 days from now, its luts, use them on photoshop or other using "color lookup" filter
>>4474991I feel bad for using it sometimes but it hits the spot, no matter how overused it is..
>>4474514New York metro
>>4475024Times Square.I wonder what New York would be like if it had remained Dutch.
>>4475027>I wonder what New York would be like if it had remained Dutch.Severely underdeveloped? The British used a lot of Empire wealth to develop the city after 1664, and it became a huge trade port and naval base. If the Dutch had held on to it it would have been a small trading hub and eventually folded into the British colonies anyway.
>>4475033I'm not sure about severely underdeveloped. The Dutch Republic was incredibly wealthy, and even today the Netherlands is wealthier (per capita) than the United Kingdom by a significant margin. The population may be smaller, but even then the location would guarantee a level of importance as a trading hub. And the population may even grow more significantly considering the Huguenots, Flemish and various Low German peoples having the chance to move their.
>>4475041The Dutch didn't tend to set up sizable colonies like the British and French did. Their interests were predominantly mercantile. They simply didn't have the Manpower to do it.
>>4475047I noted that it didn't purely have to be settlers from the Dutch republic filling up this alternative New Amsterdam. There were plenty of disaffected protestants across parts of France, Flanders, and Germany. To be fair, there were also English dissidents who may have considered setting up colonies under the flag of Nieuw Nederland given the religious tolerance. The passengers on the Mayflower did choose Leiden beforehand as their place of refuge. I do understand that the interests of the Republic were largely mercantile, but that's part of the fun with alternate history, what if there was one colony which was different?
>>4475058Paris?Nice photo, did you edit with dehancer?
>>4475005It works because it's a natural contrast we see in life every day. I much prefer that being overused than the horrific green/yellow shit that everything seems to be slathered with these days. That type of colour grading is like an attack on my eyes.
>>4475091I liked the sci-fi / illustration feel and tried to push the idea
>>4474970
>>4475124
>>4475094Shrimp packers
bruy it's impossible to reply to anything without tripping hte spam filter these days>>4474529movie poster tier, with a more even crop>>4475003awesome set. color grade chads stay winning
>>4475134What do you mean?
Somehow or other I ended up reading the rules of /p/ last night, so here's my attempt to revive their spirit.>CameraPentax K10D>LensSigma ART 18-35mm f/1.8>Exposure Settingsf/5.6, 1/180s, ISO-100, 24mm, AWB>Post-processingPolaroid 690 2- LUT
>CameraPentax K10D>LensSigma ART 18-35mm f/1.8>Exposure Settingsf/5.6, 1/250s, ISO-100, 35mm, AWB>Post-processingPolaroid 690 2- LUT
>>4475069Good observation skills, anon. Yes, I took it in the suburbs of Paris and edited it with Dehancer.
muh colors
>>4475246Cohencidentally, eggystein wrote those rules because he was insecure about his pentaxes low image quality. Also because aussies have slow internet and out of date computers. Not everyone can be america/japan/china and standardize 4k screens and gigabit fibre. There’s a reason no one follows them lol
Fish
fall foilage
I like how clear and sharp the ground looks, i never get that usually
>>4475386Cool water ambiance
>>4475334How do you get such a clean and sharp image?
>>4474529The photo feels expensive, which camera is that ?
>>4474523Everything but the framing is perfect
>>4475394Fuji XT30 kit 18-55 lens
>>4475393I don't find my image to be particularly clean and sharp if that's what you're talking about. Actually I mostly apply negative clarity
>>4475540Big boy photo, very sexy
>>4475233>>4475240>>4475395goodthank you
I can't get people to just do what they do, they all move out of the way and apologize to me
I like to torture myself and shoot in Full Manual only.
>>4475688...there are people on /p/ that don't use manual?
>>4475710Full manual isn't really the go to. AV mode or M with Auto ISO is most common I'd say. I go with the latter and just have a dial for EV comp when needed.
>>4475710My camera isn't ergonomic enough to do that on handheld so I just use aperture priority
>>4475626
>>4475688Full manual isn’t torture but literally any other mode is for me. Manual is literally aperture priority, shutter priority and ISO priority all in one all the time. It’s only torture because you don’t know, I assume, how to decide which setting to change to increase or decrease the amount of light you get. Priority modes simplify your decision making. Program mode is when you decide before the fact what settings to use in certain lighting. Honestly, manual just werkz. If I want to prioritise shutter speed, I can do that; if I want to prioritise aperture, I can do that. Just stop adjusting the wrong setting.What I actually can’t decide on as my go-to is my focus mode: MF, AF-S or AF-C; centre point or 11-point? (I have an old DSLR). I think I need to go back to manual focussing for now, at least while I still have this camera. The AF on the K10D can lock on but still look very soft after the fact. I’m not sure if it needs an adjustment. I’ll need a cardboard thingo for that. Anyway, manual mode just werkz.
>>4475689subtle
havnt posted here since may. took this last week.
>>4475672this is great but i hate the modern cars in it. itll be cool in 10 years
>>4475735>muh 18% middle grey shots
>>4473997>>4474036Finally tried a BW treatment, idk if I prefer it or not but it was a good idea. Thank you anon.
>>4475737taken with a phone ? If not do you have the raw available ?
>>4475753taken with nikon d750im not doxxing myself by sharing raws
>>4475828Such a Karen replyWhy not say: sorry mate. These contain private information. You are neither a gentleman nor a Sir.
- 3 Tours
>>4475749Black and white definitely worked here, it helps draw you more to the house while gently rolling away into shadow. I like it.>>4475844Autistic manners.
>>4474514
>>4475844Why do you hate white people?
>>4475968Omfg.....
Met this cutie in a city park, next to the abandoned section of the local apiary.Which explains why she looks so well-groomed and well-fed, compared to all the other strays around.Apiary's staff probably takes care of her.Autumn really suits her colors.
>>4475976The way id want to take that cat home
>>4475972Karen is basically an anti-white slur
>>4475992Are you serious?I am a eurofag (white (kek)) but here Karen just stands for women who over estimate their role and influence in life, generally, and practice a rather harsh tone in conversations
>>4476000Yeah but they chose a stereotypically white name for that
>>4476000NTA but Karen in the US is used almost exclusively on whites.
>>4476010that's because the non-white karens degrade themselves into lower tiers
>>4476010>>4476003So fucking what? It is a stereotype performed by almost white women only. I don't see the connection of that to be "anti white". It's just anti Karen.I could say the same thing for black women with very huge asses that they shake around. I call them Latishass! And I may add, that I find this behaviour blunt and not sexy at all. That then only counts for this specific behaviour which white ladies probably won't perform that often. This has nothing to do with black people in general though, where surely at least some don't swing their asses this way. I never saw it in my country or in other euro countries at least.
Also fuck politics. Fuck your whiny bitchass rants that you call opinions. Fuck your white knights and your oveminorities. Fuck the narcissists. And fuck everything that is "politically correct".
>>4476056>this kind of thing is what they praise Moriyama for like he's some kind of genius
I can't really tell what drew me into this filthy spot, but it still gets me
>>4476056>>4476057the pic has aura tho you cant lie
1/3Shot in Austria, I'm pretty new to photography, first trip since buying gear
>>4476089the lighting obviously>>4476054great colors
>>44761092/3
>>4476109>>44761113/3
>>4476109New to photography ? learn to grade my man come to our club, we're betterexample below:
>>4476111is that grading i see ? lightroom or lightroom adjacent stuff ? ah i see you're not new to photography you're new to /p
>>4476116it's just a crop and minor adjustments in lightroom, that does not make me an expert or anything
>>4476003You're a sensitive little bitch
Autumn at last
>>4476109>>4476113I did some more agressive editing on the first image, but I'm not sure about the resultsure it might be more impactful, but beyond a certain point it's just fake shit right that has nothing to do with reality no?one thing I definitely missed at first though is the lens profile correction
>>4476121Getting your eye used to grading, finding nice balance in colors shadows contrast light etc takes a long time, just have fun with it. For me its about creating a real mood/atmosphere that the original pic lacked, i also like imitating movie grades, with some 1/2.35 ratios.i think its really a useful skill
>>4476121Here's an example of the stuff I try on my pictures, here i went for a blue dramatic look, a bit ominous, a blue green tint, less light, making the fog take more place in the picture, and some black bars which dont belong here but shows an example of what i would do sometimes
>>4476131I like anon's pictures better, not convinced by your film filters especially for landscapes desu, I don't think they add anything interesting. I think this photo mostly lacks a definite subject. If the cliffs were the subject I think I'd prefer a different perspective. If the foggy peaks were the subject I'd probably prefer reframing and keeping the upper part.
>>4476135I think you’re retarded. The mountain is obviously the subject on account of it taking up nearly the whole frame.
>>4476135Thanks for the feedback, i was trying to quickly get a grade done hoping to get his curiosity going, i was thinking its pretty hard to grade a wall of rock and fog haha. I have a better example with my process in the image i shared of the train station up there.
>>4476131I tried some more edits, maybe a more menacing look suits the picture better?also did 16:9 cropI'll drop the raw in case anyone wants to play aroundhttps://mega.nz/file/8xJjTBzC#VcnRPQHJZLvHQ8j3OX_qcCQ3HDJuPQqvbr4zHnJA4uc
>>4476136Well then I don't think it has much going on to make it an interesting subject, the light is too flat imo
>>4476140I actually agree, some side light would have made it much better imo, but I took what I could getPic related had much better light as the sun was setting
>>4476138That's already awesome, you should mute the highlights tho, you''ll see it''ll make the picture way easier on the eye, you can see specks of light all over the mountain making it look like sandpaperand here's my best case of why grading is cool:
>>4474514I love that picture so damn much!
>>4476142Okay cool. Can you link a tutorial you would recommend?
>>4476202pull the exposure way down but keep the highlights high. also green split tones/wb
Something something cathedrals
>>4476202Since I use photoshop to grade my photos I never bothered to look up tutorials, but I'm sure there's awesome ones out there. For the cinematic look I lower the exposure until I can still see something and have the highlights managable, i kill the highlights, try to have something not so blown out, try to get something that isnt white, or a new thing I found is lifting up the shadows and then bringing them back down in the curve option. Makes the shadows a bit more vibrant
>>4476180ni hao
>>4476180Old textbook pictures be like
Uncropped version >>4476228
WIthout grading, so you can tell me if my grading is shit
Fuck my cameracel life
>>4476254
>>4476255>>4476221I like the colors>>4476196Cool angle, feels isolated, nice.>>4476138Great, so eerie.>>4476137Cute.>>4476112Saved.
>>4476256>>4474674Daylight horror, nice blacks>>4474788>>4474791Cool doggos>>4474789>>4474970Saved, love the bloom on the second one
>>4476257>>4474753Get some cows
>>4476258
>>4476196Danke schön fräulein
>>4476257Hey thanks!
>>4476294I like it. Makes me question my perception. Many good pics in here. I am very insecure about my own photos, but I enjoy "making" them very much. It gives me a drive. And without a drive, life is a lie.
>>4475124interesting rendering, very softlens?
>>4474842it does work.Looks like there is no depth in the picutre, more like a flat one.
>>4475120This looks pretty dystopian.You realy came close to your Sci/fi idea.Wandering all life throug thicc red clouds with nothing else but a headlamp, pushed to keep walking by screaming sounds behind you.When is it going to end?Is there an end?To understand the purpose you have to keep walking, so you do.You´ve got a name for it?Flame hills
>>4475726true words here, i only shoot auto if it is not important, otherwise i take my time to make it a good one.Sometimes the only Auto i use is AF..
>>4475909tasty.I want to lie on the ground like the sign.Resting a bit there.I guess the exposure is good, the background is not of importance that much anyways.
>>4476111You use Macro?
I can't do this, I can't hold an umbrella and shoot handheld reliably while using a shitty hand strap
>>4476327wrist strength: zero
>>4476316yes that pic was taken with the nikon 105mm 2.8 macro
>>4474522Cool
Here’s a photo of my Jewish wife
>>4476379Don't post your wife. You already fap to shit that would break her heart, dont drag her into your internet black hole. Have an ounce of decency.
>>4476424Anon, are you projecting?
>>4476440projecting my cum on a picture of this guys wife hahaha amirite guys
New bread:>>4476460>>4476460>>4476460
>>4476457For this YHWH brings a curse upon theeYou will progressively lose interest in women until they need to be wearing a fursuit for you to get hard and believe me you’re not the first goyim Ive done this toSchemitah bar mitzvah, kabbala falafel, soon your life will become more awful! *waves magic wand aka the same pen used to keep track of the interest the in laws owe me*
>>4476472Fucking hell, man! How could you be so cruel?Also: is that an Olympus Pen?And how much interest do they exactly owe you? Hoping your pen works digitaly.
>>4476457Nope. I dont have a wife but I wouldn't post her if I did. I wouldn't post anyone i even pretended to care about.
>>4476457A 4channer would not take offence in this.
