[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1680783063356[1].jpg (119 KB, 1080x1080)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
What are some interesting urban battles from the post-WWII era, and what lessons can be drawn from them? For example, one of the biggest battles of the civil war in El Salvador took place in November/December of 1989, when rebel groups attempted to break a stalemate by directly assaulting the capital of San Salvador with several battalions of fighters.

They grabbed portions of the city, especially around the northern suburbs, but could not break the government's lines into the central city over the course of a month. The battle was called the 'final offensive' by the rebels, which was somewhat correct, since the peace negotiation process gained momentum in 1990, and was concluded by 1992. Several thousand people were killed in the process.

Ironically, one of the big early rebel offensives in 1981 was also called 'the final offensive,' but this was followed by an additional decade of war. The rebels had a core of trained fighters and foreign advisers/weapons and larger cadres of peasants with much less training.

The professional units led the assault, but the less-proficient supporting units failed to provide enough support to break the government's forces. Even though a lot of the government's forces were poorly-trained conscripts, they had the benefit of fortified positions and predetermined lines of defense, which prevented the initial retreats from becoming a rout.

Ultimately, the offensive was considered an embarrassment for the government, but not a disaster.
>>
Importance of intelligence and local knowledge:
Accurate and up-to-date intelligence is crucial in urban warfare. This includes detailed knowledge of:
a) Urban terrain: Understanding the layout of streets, buildings, sewers, and underground networks is vital. This includes identifying key infrastructure, potential sniper positions, and choke points.
b) Enemy positions and strength: Knowing where enemy forces are concentrated, their fortifications, and their capabilities helps in planning effective operations.
c) Civilian locations and movements: Understanding where civilians are located and their likely movement patterns is critical for minimizing casualties and managing evacuations.
d) Cultural context: Knowledge of local customs, religious sites, and social dynamics can prevent actions that might alienate the local population.
e) Building structures: Information on building materials, layout, and potential weak points aids in planning breaching operations and anticipating collapse risks.
f) Local support networks: Understanding which local groups might support or oppose military operations can be crucial for operational success.
g) Real-time intelligence: Urban environments can change rapidly. Continuous intelligence gathering through drones, surveillance, and human intelligence is essential.
h) 3D mapping: Advanced 3D mapping of urban areas, including subterranean spaces, has become increasingly important for planning and execution.
i) Language skills: Having personnel who speak the local language can be invaluable for gathering intelligence and interacting with civilians.
j) Historical context: Understanding the city's history, including previous conflicts or significant events, can provide insight into potential challenges or opportunities.
>>
Need for specialized equipment and training:
Urban warfare presents unique challenges that require specific tools and skills:
a) Breaching equipment:

Mechanical breaching tools like battering rams, sledgehammers, and pry bars
Explosive breaching charges for reinforced doors or walls
Thermal breaching tools for metal doors
Hydraulic spreaders and cutters for complex entryways

b) Close-quarters weapons:

Short-barreled rifles or carbines for maneuverability in tight spaces
Shotguns for breaching and close-range effectiveness
Pistols as backup weapons
Non-lethal options like tear gas, flashbangs, and rubber bullets

c) Protection gear:

Improved body armor designed for mobility in confined spaces
Ballistic shields for hallway clearance
Eye and ear protection against debris and loud noises in enclosed areas

d) Communication equipment:

Headsets with noise-cancellation for clear communication in loud environments
Compact radios for intra-team communication
Systems for marking cleared rooms and sharing real-time intel

e) Observation tools:

Fiber optic cameras for checking around corners or through small openings
Thermal imaging devices for detecting hidden persons
Drones for reconnaissance of building exteriors and rooftops

f) Specialized vehicles:

Armored personnel carriers adapted for urban terrain
Combat engineering vehicles for clearing obstacles and debris

g) Training facilities:

Mock urban training grounds ("MOUT sites") replicating various urban environments
Virtual reality systems for scenario-based training

h) Specialized training programs:

Close-quarters battle (CQB) techniques
Room clearing and hallway navigation
Subterranean operations for sewer and subway systems

Hostage rescue scenarios
Coordinated multi-story building assaults
Urban sniper and counter-sniper tactics

i) Physical fitness:

Emphasis on functional strength and endurance for climbing, carrying equipment, and prolonged operations in buildings
>>
j) Psychological preparation:
Training to manage stress and make quick decisions in chaotic urban environments
Scenario-based exercises to improve situational awareness

k) Medical training:

Combat medics trained specifically for urban casualty care and evacuation
>>
>>472312676
Stop spamming the thread with AI garbage.
>>
>blatantly VPNing to bump your own threads

Why the fuck don't people get banned for this shit
>>
Psychological warfare and information operations:
In urban conflicts, the battle for hearts and minds is often as crucial as physical combat:
a) Media influence:

Traditional media coverage shapes both local and international perceptions
Social media allows for real-time dissemination of information and misinformation
Embedded journalists can provide direct, potentially biased perspectives
Controlling media access to conflict zones can impact narrative framing

b) Narrative control:

Crafting and maintaining a consistent narrative about the conflict's causes and goals
Rapid response to counter enemy propaganda and misinformation
Use of spokespersons and press conferences to shape public understanding
Balancing operational security with transparency to maintain credibility

c) Psychological operations (PSYOPS):

Use of leaflets, radio broadcasts, and loudspeakers to communicate with enemy forces and civilians
Exploiting enemy mistakes or atrocities to undermine their morale and support
Offering incentives for enemy fighters to surrender or defect

d) Cyber warfare:

Hacking enemy communication systems to gather intelligence or spread disinformation
Protecting friendly networks from cyber attacks
Using social media bots to amplify certain messages or viewpoints

e) Information warfare:

Disrupting enemy command and control through electronic warfare
Spreading conflicting information to create confusion and uncertainty
Targeting key enemy decision-makers with tailored messaging

f) Cultural sensitivity:

Understanding and respecting local cultural norms to avoid alienating the population
Using culturally appropriate messaging to gain support or cooperation

g) Civilian engagement:

Establishing communication channels with local leaders and civilians
Providing accurate information about military operations to reduce panic and build trust
Countering rumors and misinformation circulating among the civilian population
>>
h) Humanitarian narrative:

Highlighting efforts to protect civilians and provide humanitarian aid
Contrasting these efforts with enemy actions that endanger or exploit civilians

i) Visual imagery:

Controlling and disseminating images that support the desired narrative
Countering or contextualizing unfavorable imagery released by opponents or third parties

j) Long-term perception management:

Considering how current actions and messaging will impact post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation
Building relationships with local media for sustained positive coverage

k) Leveraging international opinion:

Engaging with international organizations and NGOs to shape global perceptions
Using diplomatic channels to reinforce messaging and gain support

l) Internal morale:

Maintaining troop morale through effective internal communication
Preparing personnel to handle hostile media encounters or propaganda efforts

m) Legal and ethical considerations:

Ensuring information operations comply with international law and ethical standards
Balancing the need for operational security with principles of transparency and truth in public communications

n) Metrics and analysis:

Developing methods to measure the effectiveness of information operations
Adapting strategies based on feedback and changing perceptions
>>
Asymmetric warfare effectiveness: Small, mobile forces can successfully challenge larger, conventional armies by exploiting weaknesses and avoiding direct confrontations. This approach allows numerically inferior groups to inflict disproportionate damage on their opponents while minimizing their own losses. The introduction of drone technology has significantly enhanced the capabilities of guerrilla forces in this regard. Low-cost, commercially available drones can be modified for surveillance, reconnaissance, and even offensive operations. These unmanned aerial vehicles provide guerrilla fighters with enhanced situational awareness, allowing them to gather real-time intelligence on enemy movements and vulnerabilities. Additionally, drones can be used to deliver small payloads or conduct harassing attacks on larger forces, further amplifying the asymmetric nature of the conflict. The relatively low cost and ease of operation of drones make them an ideal tool for guerrilla warfare, enabling small groups to project power and influence beyond their traditional means. This technological advantage can partially offset the superior firepower and resources of conventional military forces, making the "war of the flea" even more challenging for established armies to counter.
>>
Psychological impact: The persistent nature of guerrilla attacks can demoralize and exhaust the enemy. This psychological warfare aspect is a crucial component of guerrilla tactics:

Constant threat: The ever-present possibility of attack keeps enemy forces in a state of high alert, leading to stress, fatigue, and decreased combat effectiveness over time.
Unpredictability: The irregular timing and location of guerrilla strikes create an atmosphere of uncertainty and fear among opposing forces.
Erosion of morale: Repeated small-scale attacks, even if not militarily significant, can gradually wear down the enemy's will to fight.
Sense of vulnerability: Guerrilla tactics often target rear areas or supply lines, making even "safe" zones feel insecure.
Frustration: The inability to engage in decisive battles or clearly identify the enemy can lead to frustration and demoralization among conventional forces.
Propaganda value: Successful guerrilla attacks, even minor ones, can be leveraged for propaganda purposes, further impacting enemy morale and public opinion.
Sleep deprivation: The constant threat of attack can disrupt sleep patterns, leading to decreased cognitive function and decision-making abilities.
Paranoia and mistrust: Guerrilla tactics often rely on blending in with the local population, which can lead to increased paranoia and mistrust among enemy forces.
Long-term psychological effects: Prolonged exposure to guerrilla warfare can result in lasting psychological trauma for enemy combatants.
Home front impact: The protracted nature of guerrilla conflicts can erode public support for the war effort in the enemy's home country.
>>
The ability of guerrilla fighters to remain hidden and blend seamlessly with the local population is crucial for their survival and operational success. This aspect of guerrilla warfare is fundamental for several reasons:

Protection from enemy detection: By blending in with civilians, guerrillas can avoid being identified and targeted by opposing forces. This makes it extremely difficult for conventional armies to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants.
Ease of movement: Appearing as ordinary civilians allows guerrillas to move freely in both urban and rural environments without arousing suspicion. This mobility is essential for gathering intelligence, planning operations, and evading capture.
Support network: Integrating with the local population enables guerrillas to build and maintain a network of sympathizers who can provide food, shelter, information, and other forms of support.
Recruitment: Close interaction with locals facilitates recruitment efforts, as guerrillas can identify potential allies and gradually indoctrinate them into their cause.
Intelligence gathering: Living among the population gives guerrillas access to valuable intelligence about enemy movements and vulnerabilities, often through casual conversation or observation.
Psychological warfare: The inability of enemy forces to distinguish between civilians and guerrillas creates a constant state of tension and paranoia, which can be psychologically draining.
Operational security: Blending in makes it harder for enemy intelligence services to infiltrate or gather information about guerrilla operations and leadership.
Resource conservation: By avoiding detection, guerrillas can conserve their limited resources for carefully planned operations rather than constantly defending themselves.
Political impact: The close relationship with the local population can help guerrillas gain legitimacy and support for their cause, potentially undermining the enemy's political objectives.
>>
Longevity of the movement: The ability to disappear into the population allows guerrilla movements to survive even when facing superior military forces, enabling them to wage long-term campaigns.

This strategy of blending in, often referred to as "swimming in the sea of the people," is a cornerstone of successful guerrilla warfare. It presents significant challenges for conventional forces attempting to combat guerrilla insurgencies, as it blurs the lines between combatants and civilians, making traditional military tactics less effective.
>>
>>472312034
im not reading that but look at that cutie



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.