What's the political implication of killing everyone? is it wrong?
>>472812381>is it wrong?Only as wrong as letting everyone live on.
>>472812381Start at home.
>>472812381delete your stupid glowthread, glownigger
The reason all women in the entire world sheepishly admit rape fantasies is because that was the standard for over 700 million years of our evolution between hozen groundpounder and silverback gorilla.Also it was practically routine for when a new man takes over the tribe, all the babies who can't defend themselves are destroyed, so that the females don't leave since the man is now their only ticket to recreation. professional sports and completely unapolegetic shows of "these ones annoyed me once so they all die now I waited until now because we're in a situation where none of them can get away from me". And that was completely normal for 700 million years.
>>472812381Considering the flip this place had I guess there's isn't much to talk about anymore.
>>472812381Yeah it's wrong. People are people and killing will happen but getting a thirst for it signals a darkened heart.Political implication? Look at the USA for a lens into dark-hearted leadership.
>>472812381TKD is correct.It is meant to prevent future generations from suffering.
>>472812381In a legal sense, no, because if everyone dies laws won't matter.
>>472812381death literally isn't real
You are chest and posterior until your political opinion is not genocideI have a list of reasons but I'll use oneYou kill a killer and all you get is two killers