>The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is fake, goyi– I mean brother. Also, Christianity is bad and Evolution is true
>>472874527>Christianity
>>472875279
>>472874527>evolution is fakecmon anon, we can hate jews without denying reality.
>>472875651>he doesn't know that all abrahamic religions affirm Genesis 17
>>472875279>Circumcision is in genesis, therefore Christ was in favour of CircumcisionLeast retarded anti-Christian poster
>>472876027Rabbi Christ picked a mohel to write 28% of the new testament, if that's any indication of how strongly he felt about penis mutilation.https://www.biblehub.com/acts/16-3.htm
>>472875279circumcision is the sign of the old covenant, baptism is the sign of the new covenant. Christians do not need to be circumcised.
Nick Fuentes thread
Well, it doesn't matter now. They won.
>>472875800This is a bait thread.
>>472874527We know what the Protocols contain, one naturally wonders if they are “real,” “authentic.” This question is meaningless since, as Guénon remarked, “no truly, seriously secret organization, whatever its nature, leaves behind written documents.” Thus, rather than of “authenticity,” we should speak of “veracity.” The veracity of the document in question should be judged according to a criterion similar to that used in modern positive sciences, that is to say, as a working hypothesis that guides an inductive process. The hypothesis can be confirmed by revealing the inner connections and the unifying law of a collection of facts.From such a perspective, one can say that even if the Protocols are not authentic, it is as though they were authentic, for two reasons:1. Because events following their publication confirm them. 2. Because the fundamental ideas they draw from are identical to those of international jewry, so that even if the Protocols are fabricated, the author simply wrote what every jew faithful to his tradition and the deepest will of Israel and conscious of his instincts would have written.If the problem is considered in this way, the question of “plagiarism,” appears, in the end, frivolous. There are no doubt elements from earlier works in the Protocols, especially parts of a brochure written in 1865 by a revolutionary Freemason, Joly. But the Protocols do not belong to the field of literature, where plagiarism discredits a work. A strategist can make use of things revealed by others, even preserving their literal wording, if they fit into his plan, without diminishing the significance of the latter.Considerably more serious and decisive is the fact that a number o
>>472874527Solid criticism from WLP. But I respectfully disagree. For one thing, there are situations in which jews speak in this straightforward manner. If you BTFO of a jew in the intellectual arena, he will soothe his butthurt and try to reclaim some intellectual credibility by bragging about his evil schemes. And if a low ranking jew is ripped off by his own peers, he will sometimes try to get revenge by spillng the beans. I suspect the Protocols are one of these confessions. Remember, jews are more afraid of looking stupid to other jews than to the goyim, because a goy won't gang stalk them to death for being slow witted.As for Christianity and evolution, they are both crucial to the Aryans' worldview. As a physicist WLP is simply more of a sensing -- not intuitive -- person, and doesn't understand the importance and power of myth.
