Analogies are like a litmus test for IQ. How many times have you seen a conversation like this:>damn, I'm still upset I failed that math test after studying for so long just because I got one question wrong>"who cares bro">imagine practicing weeks to play in an orchestra and then fucking up the performance because you played one note wrong>"omg are you saying that playing in an orchestra is the same as taking a math test!!!"Obviously, what's being compared here is not the magnitude of the event, but failing something that you practiced for extensively because of one mistake. All over the internet you'll see people that are incapable of understanding even simple examples like the above.Analogies are an easy way to filter out average IQ midwits in the same way the breakfast question is a perfect way to detect low-IQ retards.
How does one fail an entire exam after getting a single question wrong?
>>475701284And people trying to tell me Krauts ain't funnyTHIS IS SOME HOLOHAUX TIER GASLIGHTING
>>475701054you live under water kekopinion discarded
>>475701054Conditional hypotheticals are the best test IMO>you: How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?>retard: But I did have breakfast this morning?
>>475701054But you didn't play in an orchestra.
>>475701284I've had final exams that were only 2 questions (my statistical mechanics class). Each question had like 4 pages of calculations. 2 hour exam.
>>475703513And to stick with the analogy, if you failed the second question it would be like performing a perfect trumpet solo for the first hour of the performance, then farting into the trumpet for the second half of it.
>>475701054Heil Hitler
>>475701054are you talking about the criminal analogy on /x/?what are you retarded? filthy fucking kikes you fucking disgusting jew trash you fucking moronI don't think you got the analogy, that the kikes are the criminalsfucking dumb alien morons
>>475701054its not enough to call out tardsof course abstraction isnt their strengthyou have to accept they exist and there are a lot of them
>>475703820kikeIt's not enough to call out kikes, it's obvious they're absolute idiots, being human isn't their strength
>>475701054>same way the breakfast question is a perfect way to detect low-IQ retardsThe breakfast question is a true midwit filter, the answers follow normal distribution. Let's explore.>How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast today?A low IQ retard might say "I did eat breakfast" essentially meaning he would feel the same. A midwit on the other hand would say "I'd feel hungry". While the true High IQ would most likely say "I'd feel the same"There really is only a short window of time where you would say 'I'd feel hungry' and that's the hours between breakfast and lunch. If you get asked this question any other time of the day, you'd feel exactly the same for not having had breakfast in the morning.
>europoors outing themselves as midwits in yet another threadhashtag just friday morning things
>>475701054I don't care about anything you just wrote.
>>475701054Did the examinee have breakfast?
