Is communism more evil than it is stupid or is 50/50 evil/retarded a fair estimation
How about 100% stupid, 100% evil.
50% sea50% weed
>>475720180The leaders are evil, the useful idiots are stupid
>>475720180
>>475720261pretty accurate
>>475720180The people who actually subscribe to the idea are the lowest common denominator and, hence, dumb as a rock. But at the top? Pure fucking evil.
>>475720261Chad
>>475720341Atheism was the state religion of Soviet Union while it was killing 10s of millions of Russians, you revisionist nigger.
50/50 splits rarely existAssume a pareto distribution, then logically deduce which half is more dominant For commies it's 20%evil leading the 80% retarded
I don't believe in political movements anymore. Everything gravitates to the same direction anyways. Even libertarianism leads to literal communes eventually. Populist determinism or something.A corny quote would be:>Communism is not the means to an end, but the final stop.I don't know if the right time ever comes.
There is nothing evil about communism, it is people who are evil by nature and will take advantage of the weak if allowed. And those who compare the victims of the USSR or Mao with modern life are retarded because there was a different life, different people and different situation. In the Russian Empire, people were illiterate and the Soviet Union achieved enormous success in the short time it existed. They may not have dressed nicely, but they built so much factories and weaponry that it saves Russia's life to this day.
>>475721495
>>475720584read up on sources of those ''killings''. Everything is just the wildest estimates, the same as with holocaust. Also killing was happening under Stalin, not under Khrushev and later on. When the killings stopped bureaucracy together with elites started to form.
the only system that cares for people's needs as a goal
