Place your bets
>>489001751an easy 'no'OP is a faggot
It won't be nukes, it would be stupid to escalate to the max right before trump gets into office. But they have to match the escalation of our corrupt retards in office so as to not look weak.
>>489001751I didn't want this dystopian future.
>>489001751Won't happen because ultimately Russia isn't willing to get itself Nuked just for Ukraine. Which the US knows and which is why they should've let Ukraine do this sooner.
>>489001751Let me know when the odds are at least 60 405% win on a bet is lower than my annual return on investments (~100%)
>>489002207I forgot again.
>>489001751The no bet seems like an easy 5%, because the escalation of that will end civilization.
>>489002207Annual. That's 6 weeks.
The point is that you can't use a nuclear weapon, even a tactical nuclear weapon, and just get away with it.That would cause a strong reaction from NATO and no, muh nuclear doctrine updated, is not an excuse.
>>489001989Could you see them nuking a Euro nation like Britain or France? Though that would trigger Article 5, of course.
Bet on No>If you are right: Make 5%>If you are wrong: Die in nuclear hellfireIts a bet you cannot lose!
>>489002121Does Russia, or rather Putin, believe that if it loses in Ukraine it faces an existential crisis?If that is the case, why wouldn't they resort to nukes rather than lose? If they lose, everyone else can lose, too.
>>489002241I got a day time job. I'm doing alright.
>>489002296That is a one year graph.
>>489001989It's going to be nukes at wherever they launch atacms from next
>>489002298> The point is that you can't use a nuclear weapon, even a tactical nuclear weapon, and just get away with it.What are you gonna do? IMPOSE SANCTIONS?Or maybe send weapons to ukraine?The whole point is that you've run out of leverage against Russia. You either engage in a direct conflict involving the entire military complex and nuclear weapons, or you turn a blind eye to everything we do with cock holes.There are no other options. You either enter WW3 or you don't.Do you think the US wants to lose its entire economy and millions of American lives for the sake of Ukraine? That's right.
>>489002298They could start nuclear testing again. Build Tsar Bomb but actually detonate the full scale version and not the cucl version they did.
>>489001751That's like asking if Ukraine will win the war.
>>489002304>>489002267Buy an ad.
>>489001751Why the fuck would you bet for nukes? If you win you can't even collect.
>>489002602so some random field from a HIMARS, retard?
>>489001751No, because nukes are fake and gay, and even if they weren't, he wouldn't use'em
>>489002370The existential crisis has already occurred. 1) Sweden and more importantly Finland joined NATO and the Russia's entire Baltic sea strategy is compromised with or without Ukraine. Remember a lot of that strategy is based on the assumption of a landwar in Russia. 2) Russia's military has been exposed as being much, much, much weaker than previously thought. Sure the US government probably knew but now everyone knows. More importantly Russia's population knows. For these two reasons I would argue the damage is done.
>>489001751no.
>>489001831If it was yes there's no chance you'd be able to collect from Polymarket anyhow.
>>489002732Does that count? They don't specify, but I'm clinically retarded.
>>489001751If my post ends in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 then he will not nuke
>>489001751Nukes aren’t real. Just another 80 year old fear mongering psyop tactic. Get with it, nigger brain.
>>489001751>betting 'yes'>just 'risk mitigation' broNukes just flew over my house !
>>489001751This is pointless. In a nuclear WW3 scenario your money is meaningless. All investments will head towards zero. Get out of assets and get into t-bills or cash
WW3 doomers are incredible stupid.
>>489003130
>>489003190And apparently out in full force on 4chan. Friendly reminder that /pol, like the rest of the world, is healthily populated with knee-jerk dumbfucks
>>489001751I heard after the nuclear apocalypse, they'll pay in bitcoin.
>>489001751DONT DO IT SWEDE ANON WHO BET ON KAMALA WINNING, DONT BE A HERO, DONT BE A FOLL WITH ALL OUR LIVES
>>489002602ukies blowing up a tank column doing training isnt going to make putin drop nukes. all he has to do is wait one more month. he isnt going to sweat 30 dead russians this close to the finish line and neither is zelensky, who has a town house waiting for him in delaware the moment the ink dries on the surrender.
>>4890024065% in 6 weeks on a sure bet is like 50% annual. Not terrible.
>>489003130o shit nigga
>>489003426Here's a good bet.
>>489001751How does this betting work? If you bet $.05 and it happens you win a buck, if you bet $.95 and it doesn't happen you win a buck?Seems like some clever anons could find some loopholes in this system and print money
>>489002956But isn't that every incentive to nuke? Bring it all down.
>>489003426Here's another good one.
>>489001751Do they censor bets? Nothing on Zelensky getting assassinated before Trump sits down in office?
>>489003130You may want to edit your post
>>489003130huh
>>489002267No one gonna pay you when everything is nuked
>>489003647You want it brought all down. Believe it or not they take pride in their country, their culture. He isn't a retard 4chan poster masturbating to end of the world scenarios. He gambled and he lost but he isn't crazy.
>>489001751>yes>CANNOT REDEEM
>>489002604Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that you can't do it but it would be the point of no return that would actually lead to engage a world conflict.And to be fair, would be stupid. Do you want to pulverize the shit out of Ukrain? Use a Tsar bomb, I don't care, but spraying nuclear radiations all over Europe/NATO countries would definitely have consequences.
>>489003585betting on outsiders has been the way to make vast quantities of money if lucky
>>489001751I would bet No because if yes, your money loss will be the least of your concern
>>489001751lol. lmao. nothing ever happens russia literally can't do shit
>>489001751i would bet yes because some random obscure news site will claim they did even though they didn't.
>>489003585It would have to be a coordinated event. We'd have to form a shills farm and sway public opinion. I don't think 4chan has ever had that kind of power.
The CIA hates Trump because he isn't on the team. Covid didn't work right and now he is talking about gutting the agency with a rogue mega billionaire autist. They are going full tilt this time. Popping off a nuke to destroy their eternal enemy isn't a big stretch.
>>489001751>mfw I win the bet
The only way I see it happening is if Poland is suckered into mobilizing a huge force that will march into Ukraine, then Russia. If it's anything else, like an attack on a Russian nuclear reactor, then there will be no way to collect the winnings.
>>489005342The odds for no is shit. Youll lose it.
>>489005472Another pollak projection...
>>489005060> lead to engage a world conflict.It does not> but spraying nuclear radiations all over Europe/NATO countries would definitely have consequences.Nuclear weapons don't work that way.It barely contaminates the arrival site, let alone many kilometers away.
