What is, for you, the thing that most defines the left vs. right?For me it's obviously egalitarianism vs. hierarchy.
>>489070314Master morality vs slave morality
>>489070314Globalism (left) vs nationalism (right)
>>489070314You can't have egalitarianism and critical race theory at the same time.
>>489070314The right is far more egalitarian in practice then the left, that's why they won.
>>489070396This is a wrong view once there is a right wing globalization (neoliberalism) and a left wing nationalism (free palestine).
>>489070314Truth (right) vs wrong (left)
>>489070370fpbp
>>489070568The right defends there are natural differences between people and that justifies social inequality.
>>489070314they both put on memeflags to shill useless nigger threads
>>489070314Reformism vs. Conservatism
>>489070370/thread
>>489070314Good vs Evil
>>489070314
>>489071293I agree, in some sense, reformism/revolution can be a core value to the left and conservatism/tradition to the right.BUT I don't think this is the main point that defines them both, because sometimes the left can argue about traditions (maori protest) and the right can be reformost like many protestants are.
>>489070314its a false dichotomy. whatever propaganda wants left/right to be at any moment, thats what it is. its all selfish retards.
>>489071312>>489070370This is wrong because slaves protect their owners' interest. Both the master and the slave work in the same logic, but only the master benefits from it.The left is that which defies this logic.
>>489070314Right are tops, left are bottoms Both are faggots.
>>489070314It's a purely emotional term which nobody can precisely define and it's how they divide the people so they don't unite.
>>489070314Jesus Christ is not present in either camp, so they have that in common.
>>489070314I'd argue, that egalitarianism is possible on the right, while hierarchy is impossible on the left, that is the differencethe right are useful idiots while the left are useless idiotsthe right can integrate leftism but the left cannot integrate conservative ideologya heart of flesh can latch to a rock, but a rock cannot sit on hearts of flesh without crushing them
>>489070314I like the color blue. Red is kinda icky because it's the color of blood. Though i like Roses and my boyfriend's favourite color is red because he says blue is for fags. But i love the ocean and the blue sky and I like blueberries!So blue!
>>489070314Left = Collectivism>Taxes, nationalised industries, public healthcare and education etc. Individuals are seen as part of the collective, so collective is responsible for the individual.Right = Individualism>Freedom from taxation, regulations etc. No individual has any responsibility towards the collective.Liberal = Progressive>Aims for social egalitarianism via eradication of racism, sexism etc. The social collective is seen as inequal, and has to be fixed by uplifting groups seen as weaker by fixing systemic inequality.Conservative = Tradition >Aims to conserve traditional values and opposes social change. The collective change is seen as a threat for individual values, and individual values are seen as more important than collective values.
>>489071518Left and right are relative to time, liberation theology and some progressive Protestant movements, especially those focused on social justice, align with left-wing ideologies of that time, they want es to change and not conserve. In the same way restoring historical justice through traditionalism isn't really traditionalism because traditionalism focuses on preserving and maintaining established norms and structures as they are in a very close past. The more extreme right wing you are the more you want to conserve past values and the more left wing you are the more you want to change them
>>489070370>>489070396>>489070757
>>489075767Also this, red jew supporter and blue jew supporter are two ways that define left VS right
>>489070314Retards.It's belief in objective morality/reality vs. belief in subjective morality/reality.The BASIS of the beliefs do not matter, nor whether the beliefs are consistent nor the nature of morality at all. The right is defined by its belief that there is a primordial good, that things can be good, that people can be good or evil, and that it is possible to know and return to "goodness" whatever that happens to be.Leftists may believe something is """good""" but they definitionally believe that it is good because they were socialized to believe it is good. It's "good" relative to society's values, etc.Queue the retarded leftist that fails to understand that I am not saying reality IS objective, but that "rightism" is the essence of belief in an objective real / moral.Rigid heirarchy, the greatness of one's race or nation, the place of the sexes, the valuation of art based on skill rather than self expression, etc., all stem from this belief whether the person is conscious of it or not.
>>489070314niggers (left) vs whites (right)
>>489070314Equality vs Inequality
left: "i don't wanna grow up!"right: "you have to grow up."
>>489070314well, memeflag, i'd say left is pro-communism and right is anti-communism
