We have a deadly problem in politics. It's called Centrism.Centrism, also called "compromise", is a virtue espoused by traitors. It is the means by which the right, which is in fact right, is tricked and subverted into destroying itself. >Oh, but you can't get 100%>there has to be some middle ground>we've never been so dividedIf only that last were true. how safe we might all be if no one could agree on anything. The entire legislature might grind to a halt, the government might shut down. Bureaucrats, soldiers, police, judges, and road crews would all stop working as their paychecks stopped coming in. Meanwhile, your life would improve every day that these people were unable to come together on anything. you would be less harrassed, less in danger of a return to lockdowns, less in danger of astroturfed riots, less in danger of being shunted into the meatgrinder of jewish wars.Jesus Christ once spoke on his opposition to unity among mankind, in Matthew 10:34-39 and Luke 12:51. And while he was saying these things in regards to himself, and alleagiance to him, his opposition to the unity of mankind is long established in Genesis 11, and even in Genesis 4, as God set mankind at odds with oneanother to prevent them from deteriorating completely. humanity in agreement with oneanother is a terrible thing, as Covid showed us.It is in the interest of all of you, therefore to promote division as the highest goal of politics. This can in turn lead to more divisions and purity tests within parties, and thus more fracturing as disagreement intensifies. The end goal, hopefully, and if the splits can evenly divide and atomize groups, will prevent any majority on any opinion, and prevent any consensus, as everyone hates everyone else, thus ensuring that to the extent that no one can agree:Nothing Ever Happens.
>>489083572Why is Arizona on the right. They've been red for years.
mmmm i think i disagree op
>>489083572New South American gang just dropped>Does /pol/ know anything about these Venezualan's? Apparently, connected to the Lakken Riley big case where this fucker went for a bench trial. Also, why would you go for a bench trial? Did your crew put you up to this?Apparently tren means train. Probably, have to torture a gang member to get the aquila part. I'm sorry they won't let me START A FUCKING THREAD!!!
>>489083928You shouldn't hate, seek justice instead.Oh shit they let me start a thread. >>489084137
>>489083897Good! That means it's working already.
>>489083712because it's a flippantly chosen graphic for the post.
>>489083572yeah compromise is so gay, imagine looking a serial killer in the eye and trying to argue with him, eh, at least you will enjoy the few minute of life you will save
>>489083572>>489084834this brings me to my next point>The Moderate, as the traitor to mankind.>If I had one bullet, and a moderate and a communist in front of me, I'd shoot the moderate, and let eth comunist starve to death on a communal farm.Compromise, says the moderate, is a political goal. it permits egalitarianism, it permits people who disagree to have their say, because everyone gets a bit of what they want, as a synthesis is formed of different oppinions, and a hybrid slightly acceptable to all is agreed upon. Do you see how gay that premise is?What possible hybrid can people who are rightfully anti-homosexual have with people who are looking to let gays engage on their slow grooming process to hurt children?Any compromise will lead to gays getting their AID's and pox riddled members on children. >nb4 muh slippery slope fallacyyou miss spelled "The Iron Law of the Slippery Slope", also referred to as the "Anti-Correlation Gaslight". If you give position 1, you will end up at the end goal of your enemy. "moderate" positions are used to win by attrition.
