[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_6407.jpg (749 KB, 1284x759)
749 KB
749 KB JPG
NATO also has cyber defence experts that can be sent to help Allies under attack.
>>
>>489094837
Ok.
>>
>>489094837
i would hope so.
platforms are like various fronts as well.
im sure they get up to all sortsa shit.
same as all the rest.
>>
>>489094837
total blue hat death
>>
Back in 2016 the un declared that actors on this board (not outright stated but heavily implied) were operating at “state level” in regards to infosec and distribution lol.
>>
>>489094837
Does this mean that Russian cyber criminals could accidentally escalate a conflict? Or that a cyber attack by Russia (or any other non-NATO country for that matter) such as the Russian SolarWinds hack would trigger article 5, resulting in a war?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.