DNS is what controls where "Infowars com" connects, not the fucking (((government)))We switch to a private DNS, and Alex Jones continues to run Infowars from a country without an extradition treaty
>>489101495The idea of a 'Dissident DNS' servicr is honestly.ohenomrnal. I'm sure it would nred to be decentralizedand resilient, because of course'cipyright holders' are going to claim its an infringement to direct traffic requesting 'their wrvsite' go elsewhere.I think potentially this could ve covered by an 'ipt in clause', making everyone acknowledge its an alternative service intended to replace the 'official' endpoints with alternatives and there should be no expectation the name resolves to the domain owner.But i think there is a real market for something like this in general.Does the dissident dns community agree that nbc is fake zionist media? Great lets vote on a redirect - maybe it should lead to wikileaks or whatever instead.That said i know this is pie in the sky, since this could also be achieved via browser extensions that redirect by domain (which exist).But i want this to exist. Ehat do we want? Dissident DNS.When do we want it? Previously and presentlyFreedom! Like a new july 4th
>>489102080>servicr is honestly.ohenomrnalWhat? Are you drunk? This post is a mess
>>489102080
