Really though, why follow social norms, laws, morality instead of being a ubermensch if you had no backlash for what you did?
>>489105495>just chop down all the trees even if you don't need lumber>what could go wrong?
>>489105495I’d probably get a wife that’s 12 or 13 but only if she’s ready emotionally for it.
because I choose to
The ubermensch is chained. Explanation to follow.
just nutted ask me anything
>>489105777Okay, so being an ubermensch doesn't mean following no rules. It means forging your own chains. It means critically engaging with value systems and deciding for yourself what is meaningful. Any ubermensch is going to have their own unique set of rules they follow - that's part of the definition. This ability to internally define yourself and then adhere to your own rules (to forge profound self-bindings) is also part of the definition.It's deeply unlikely that the ubermensch's rules are identical to society's. You could independently rederive every principle of society, at least in theory, but come on. Some of society's rules are trash. Sometimes society is ruled by horrible r-strategist rodent-aristocrats like Elon Musk. It's practically inevitable that an ubermensch is going to disagree with society's rules somewhere. So what happens then?The ubermensch is an ideal based on power. The self-binding aspect is self-power, but external power still does matter. So, an ubermensch would evaluate society's rules as a system of power pressing on them. They would violate that power with their own power where they could - in the dark, the ubermensch is their own self - but where their own power would be lost in violating the external power structure, they should seek to appear to satisfy the external power structure. The ubermensch then seeks the moments of darkness where they can utilize their own power free of society's external power.Importantly, even in darkness the ubermensch adheres to their self-bindings. The values that the ubermensch creates are their true self, and anyone who has a true self should understand what it is to be proud of one's chains.
>>489105495Fuck off kike
>>489106372self-definition is inherently suspect and inauthentichow many people have you met who are colossal arseholes, but would define themselves as 'good people'?every single act of evil that has ever taken place was somehow justified as right at one point by the perpetratorone's self-view is inherently fraudulent, and inherently useless, viewed as it is through the lens of the egoreject that kind of existentialist communistic bullshit, and accept your ESSENCEidentity is WHAT you are, not WHO YOU THINK you are, and you cannot ever know it
>>489105495No man is his own castle, perfection doesn't exist.You need allies in real life to make anything.
