[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


From my understanding doing what's best for each other is by definition the objectively best societal system since it requires the truth which is true no matter and you need to know it to do that unlike trading for which I have not found an innate motive beyond the personal well-being so please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>>489109735
Outsourced social acceptance when you surpass dunbar's number
>>
>>489109735
How do we know what’s best for everyone? It’s infinitely easier to be hands off and let everyone figure it out through personal interaction which leads to markets which leads to currency which leads to capitalism.
>>
>>489109833
Perhaps the most ironic thing about local religion is they hate the concept of evolution but organize themselves literally like tribal monkeys and just thank God that it's functional.
>>
>>489109833
Can you please elaborate what you meant with your post because I'm confused. From my understanding social circles should be smaller so people can be more involved as the more people you have the difficult it is to remember and interact with them.
>>489109852
From my understanding that's done through our biological needs. Please correct me if I'm wrong but it's impossible that taking the risk of letting people become neglected and exploited to be easier because that way you can possible set them back a lot and would need longer to recover from it than if everyone is striving to reach their potential which is by definition the least risky thing as it focuses on the most concentrated improvement.
>>
>>489110280
WHICH IS WHY CURRENCY DEVELOPED FOR BIGGER GROUPS YES

I don't see what's confusing here. Forgive my caps. You outsource something when it becomes more effective to not do it locally
>>
Money itself stands for social acceptance. Instead of praising someone, you give them $20/hr
>>
>>489110393
From my understanding you don't need currency to do that and if there's an organizational problem you can use a representative.
>>
Social acceptance also infers sharing resources inside a tribe. If you aren't part of it, being an outcast was literally death
>>
>>489110518
Tell me how you personally thank 700 people for helping with a project and give them resources and social standing accordingly. I'll wait.
>>
>>489110473
From my understanding you don't need to give people money if they have everything they need.
>>489110537
From my understanding sharing is done without any expectations by definition:
>have a portion of (something) with another or others.
>>489110607
From my understanding things don't have to be done personally by a single person but a group of organizers who will take care of that.
>>
>>489110761
Without money, you're going to form a group of organizers to provide for workers? Sounds an awful lot like an accounting department but okay
>>
>>489111155
From my understanding things can be organized so their needs can be satisfied more efficiently.
>>
Well I know those basados I put them there myself



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.