Nukes are not real. It is all a big hoax just like the Holocaust.Stop living in fear.
>picAll of these cities were rebuilt with help from outside. After the nuke help won't come.
>>489255318the ukraine isn't real and yet
>>489255318yepp how am i supposed to believe that ICBM can weight 36000kg and fly at 25000 km /h . they're making up this stuff.
>>489255554Yeah, it would be a wasteland, uninhabitable. Retard
>>489255318> "It was my considered opinion, I told correspondents in Tokyo, that the effects of the atom bombs -- not of future bombs, but these two - had been wildly exaggerated. If dropped on New York or Chicago, one of those bombs would have done no more damage than a ten-ton blockbuster; and the results in Hiroshima and Nagasaki could be achieved by about 200 B-29's loaded with incendiaries, except that fewer Japanese would have been killed. I did not "underrate" atom bombs or their future potential. I merely conveyed my professional findings on the physical results of the two bombs - and they happened to be in startling contrast to the hysterical imaginative versions spread throughout the world.> My findings were pounced upon an outraged anger by all sorts of people, and the press, on the air, at public forums; and by scientists who haven't been within 5,000 mi of Hiroshima. But the violence of this reaction cannot alter the facts on view and the two Japanese cities.> I began my study of Japan by flying over Yokohama, Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe, and dozens of other places. Later I visited them all on foot.> All presented the same pattern. The bombed areas looked pinkish - an affect produced by the piles of ashes and rubble mixed with rusted metal. Modern buildings and factories still stood. That many of the buildings were gutted by fire was not apparent from the air. The center of Yokohama, for instance, seemed almost intact and viewed from an airplane. The long industrial belt stretching from Osaka to Kobe had been laid waste by fire, but the factories and other concrete structures were still standing. On the whole it was a picture quite different from what I had seen in German cities subjected to demolition bombardment. The difference laying the fact that Japanese destruction was overwhelmingly incendiary, with comparatively little structural damage to inflammable targets.
>>489259740> In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sites. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.There was a familiar pink block, and two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities 20 bridges was down. Hiroshima's clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.> It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.> I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Here I saw the building structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flagpoles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.> At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the quotation mark bald spot quotation mark where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn't there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.> What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs - the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses raised by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders into milk glass until it ran like lava - just as another Japanese cities.> The concrete buildings nearest to the center of the explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the Adam blast, show no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single hyphen panel frames held firm semicolon only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.
>>489259785> Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions match the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings and areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima's 10 - story press building, about three blocks from the center of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unheard. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.> Most of the window panels are blown out of the Hiroshima hospital, about a mile from the heart of the explosion. Because there were no wooden structures nearby, however, it escaped fire. The people inside the hospital were not seriously affected by the blast. In general the effects were analogous to those produced by the blast of a distant TNT bomb.> In Nagasaki, concrete buildings were gutted by fire but we're still standing upright.> All of downtown Nagasaki, though chiefly wouldn't in construction, survived practically undamaged. It was explained that apparently it had been shielded from the explosion by the intervening hills. But another part of Nagasaki, and a straight, unimpeded line from the explosion center and not protected by the hills, also escape serious damage. The Nagasaki blast had virtually dissipated itself by the time it reached this area. Few houses collapsed and none caught fire.> All destruction in Nagasaki has been popularly credited to the atom bomb. Actually, the city had been heavily bombed 6 days before. The famous Mitsubishi plant was badly punished by eight high - explosive direct hits.- Major Alexander P. de Seversky'Atomic Bomb Hysteria', by Major Alexander P. de SeverskyFebruary 1946 Reader's Digest, pages 121 to 126https://files.catbox.moe/62h6h7.pdf
