Another blown up american shitbox tank the abrahams soon ukraine will have zero abrahams nigger tranny main tank by next year.You can how INFERIOR wh*Te weapons are to eastern ones of the Pan Asian Coalition.
>>492019559cope
>>492019559Thats an M1 Abrahams
>>492019559>tanks getting destroyed in a warwow mindblowing
>>492019559why do you blame the tank and not the operator?the Abrams Tank is fine.
>>492019559>old version>no reactive armour>given to a skeleton military without extensive training on the vehicleI hate abrams, wish we didnt own these pos. Try harder next time with you're bait though.
>>492019559>Pan Asian CoalitionRicenigger played too much BF2142. Can't blame you, that shit was awesome.
>>492020697>but but but it's old!always with the fucking copes
Aren’t tanks just metal coffins on tracks at this point? Anyone can one shot them as soon as theyre spotted
>>492020821Yep was gonna say the same.Fuck EA for killing it off.
>>492019559Buddy you are a wrong korean to make posts like this
>>492021058Korea is a major member state of the Pan Asian Coalition
ME PREYY JOKEYME GO PREE PREE IN YOUR COKEYOHOHIHOJOHHOOHOHOHOHOHOHPREEZ MISTER BRADDU PITTUPREEZ NO MORE BEAT A MEE UPPUI AM SMARR SICKLY RERROW MANNMY PRENIS ISSA SO SMARRISSA RIKE A BRABY PRENISISSA SO SMARRRMY RERROW WOMMEN SO HORRRNY FOR BRIG WHITE DRAGON COCKMY RERROW WINMEN SO WHOREWAAAAAAAAAA
>>492019559It's not invincible and never was that doesn't mean it's a bad tank. Also their tank doctrine is fucking terrible. I have one question for you though. Did the crew survive?
>>492019559russia is down to using WWII tanks...
>>492020498It's really not fine. It's too heavy, difficult to maintain and too expensive. USA can't supply enough of them to Ukraine. Ukraine needs way more than is being provided.>>492020697Abrams in Ukraine have reactive armor. Well, that one doesn't, but tons of them do. Have cages too. It's also not an old version, it's comparable to the ones USA uses with only minor features missing. (cooled thermals, commander turret control). The armor on hull and turret front is worse too, but that really doesn't matter since they all get taken out by drones and ATGMs anyway.
>>492019559Lol sure showed us.
>>492019559>turret is still on top of the tankDefinitely not a Russian tank
>>492021439Sega, hire this man
>>492021528>It's too heavynope its not>difficult to maintainskill issue and actually its very easy to maintain.>and too expensiveUkraine isnt even paying for them>USA can't supply enoughUSA has thousands of Abrams but its pointless to deliver them if ukrainians have no skills and act retarded. would be a huge waste.>Ukraine needsthey need to git gud first and they also have more Abrams tanks than Russia has Armatasone Abrams can easily destroy a platoon of T90s
>>492020858Fuck gayto, Putin and Ukraine, but I dont care about a tank being exploded. It doesn't prove anything, old or new, trained on it or not. Tanks are becoming more and more obsolete by the day. I dont care about your gay political skew. Or whether you want to be disingenuous about your example.
>>492019559Does that thing got a hemi?
>>492024939>Tanks are becoming more and more obsolete by the dayno they arent, you will always need Tanks. Tanks are never going away but they will change a lot.
>>492019559Why don't you sell your tanks to Ukraine then if they are so good and so much better? Kim has no problems supplying russia with meat and old soviet hardware and at the same time cucking SK.
>>492019559They are basically a old original version from the 1980s
>>492019559Does russia even have any tanks left?
>>492019559TWO TANKS?!?
>>492025829no
>>492024784Ukraine isn't paying for them, but the US tax payer is and for better or worse the US government isn't willing to pay the required amount to supply Ukraine with as many as they need.Ukraine needs more tanks, you can keep being a retard about "Ukraine using the wrong" all you want, but they aren't using them wrong. It's a war. Obviously tanks are going to get blown up in a war. US needs to supply enough tanks and parts to counteract attrition from combat and mechanical failures. Which they aren't doing.Also yes, it's very obviously too heavy. Bridges in Ukraine have trouble supporting a vehicle of that weight.>they need to git gud first and they also have more Abrams tanks than Russia has Armatas??? The fuck does Armata have anything to do with this you dullard? Armata isn't used in combat, because it's not fit for purpose and the logistics supply chain to operate it on the front line doesn't exist. Russia uses T-90s and T-72s instead. The Abrams aren't needed to engage those, they are needed to conduct all kinds of combat missions which in very very rare occasions may include encounters with other tanks.Germans really are pretty retarded when it comes to military, huh? No wonder you lost both world wars.
>>492026324lol look at this butthurt vatnik
