[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why can't we just kill the rich?

Give me your best rightoid mental gymnastics.
>>
>>492024877
because they don't consent
>>
>>492024877
You'll go to hell
>>
You have free time to post here. You are rich.
>>
>>492024877

Because the politicians will still be alive.
>>
They already are... it's a slow process but it looks like something's about to happen.
>>
>>492024877
>he thinks money is important
kek
>>
>>492024877
> Why can't we just kill the rich?
Because you’re pussies. And you don’t have the stomach or the grit to kill anyone.
>>
>questionthread
>memeflag
>no source, argument, or context
>1 post by this ID
Do not reply to bots, newfags.
>>
>>492024877
they're minorities
>>
File: 1726532420979.jpg (89 KB, 415x473)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
>>492024877
why can't you just get a job
>>
>>492024877
the shamans persecute your intuition, they make sure the rich energise the system to do that. Get the real head of the snake.
>>
>>492024877
BEcause it typically means "Anybody at hand who might have more than me"
Put a hard border on that and let's see where we go with it then
>>
>>492024877
I am rich because I am satisfied, not satisfied because I am rich.
>>
File: 1706330100229114.jpg (48 KB, 504x504)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>492024877
>>
>>492024877
Because the rich control the police and the military, dipshit
>>
>>492025064
Lol
>>
>>492024877
>why can't we just
You don't need mental gymnastics.
You don't need refutation.
You just need to think about the second step.
>What second step?
>>
>>492025371
you got to make dumb man moves to make money.
>>
>>492024877
Dear jewish memeflag, we want to kill at least 40% of all billionaires too.
>>
Killing is wrong but seizing the assets of everyone who profited from immigration and outsourcing, placing them in camps and forcing them to work to earn their freedom is moral and ethical.
>>
File: IMG_9105.gif (268 KB, 850x850)
268 KB
268 KB GIF
>>492024877
Because I have lots of guns and know how to use them was trained to kill and got really good at it. Now I have lots of money from legal cannabis businesses. I say bring it broke boy id feed you your teeth for lunch one by one after your teeth are gone I’ll cut off your toes and make you swallow them after your toes are gone next is your finger nails after you’ve eaten your teeth toes and finger nails I’ll cut the tips of your fingers off and make your swallow those too. Now that you are nice and full I’ll cut your dick and balls off I’ll insert them in to a fresh incision I make across your throat.


Still feel like killing the rich? I’ll be waiting faggot
>>
>>492024877
Rich people are jewish and high iq, we are but humble goyem unworthy of their mercy.
>>
>>492024877
You’re not serious people. You’re not even human. You’re just ridiculous, online half-men who see everything in life the same way you see TikToks or YouTube shorts. Everything is entertainment. And nothing is real or true. Just look at your browser histories. You’re digital heroin addicts and loafs of shit who live through your screens, have no friends, no kids, no relationships etc. And everything is just entertainment and digital dopamine. You think retards like this kill people (or even leave their homes)?
>>
>>492024877
Is your presumption that all wealthy people made their fortune through dishonest practices? What problem would killing wealthy people solve? Would there not be a vacuum filled? Philsophically, do all people deserve to be wealthy or are all people who are without responsible enough to be wealthy?
>>
because the state will stop you.
the state simply exists to enforce the will of the rich while conning the poor into accepting their lot
>>
>>492024877
>Why can't we just kill the rich?
>
>Give me your best rightoid mental gymnastics.

https://fablesofaesop.com/belling-the-cat.html
>>
>>492024877
There's no mental gymnastics required you dumb retard. Do you not want the freedom to become rich? That said, cronies bad.
>>
>>492024877
Because I want to be rich someday
>>
>>492024877
Because there is no "we"
>>
The 4chan will not let me post.
>>
>>492024877
Personally I wouldn't want to be murdered by a random jealous nigger.
>>
>>492024877
If you kill the rich, the poor will use all resources without creating anything and then descend into civil war when there's no one left to create wealth.
>>
>>492024877
because we need to kill the jews aswell
>>
>>492024877
>Give me your best rightoid mental gymnastics.
Becoming rich is only a crime under communism
>>
Common counter arguments:
>it would cause a purity spiral
Having killed the 1%, I doubt the 2% would want to take their place, having doubled the wealth of every American further action wouldn't be necessary.
>race of the 1%
I make no distinction regarding who the 1% are as individuals. The pope, someone who won the lotto, anyone the 1% might try to give their money to.
>the rich are needed
This is conflating the ability of the rich as individuals with their economic position.
The 2% would obviously become the richest in terms of position, and few of the 1% actually hold genuine executive positions. Their practical roles are usually tokenistic and could simply be filled by the people they ordinarily employ.
>it would be wrong
According to who? The elites, their employees and idiots who listen to them.
>I won't help
Thankfully public support isn't required, if you want to watch that's OK.
>you won't do shit
There are how many million Americans? One of us will do shit, two, three? The 1% might number only 500, 1000, how many men do you think the task would call for?

If you walked into a bank, how many of the bank staff would actually oppose you? The shareholders of banks don't even work in the bank.
Yaughts, private planes, mansions. Would a million American corporate employees defend their biggest share holders mansion? The workers don't even know the name of who owns them.
>>
>>492025413
Laugh and mock all you want until you find yourself as a killer, spending your whole life looking over your shoulder, never getting rest, not even in your dreams as they become nightmares. It's hard not to agree these people should be killed, but it's even harder to do it.
>>
>>492027963
The poor deserve to be poor because they are inferior and would die without the rich.
>>
>>492024877
if you kill all the rich you end up with a poor country
>>
>>492027963
>>you won't do shit
>There are how many million Americans? One of us will do shit, two, three? The 1% might number only 500, 1000, how many men do you think the task would call for?
And yet nobody ever does shit, you niggers can only shoot up schools and peaceful public gatherings.
>muh Luigi
1. Not him.
2. Glows
>>
>>492027641
Workers having disposable income, high retail sales, a base for national industry. That's the 50's economy you idolise, no?
>>492027838
Always with the Jews.
>>492028214
I've never seen a billionaire plough a field, fix a tractor, mill steel, connect a power line or teach in a school.
In terms of managers, I strongly suspect the 1% has no actual role in practical management, they just own shares.

A bank has 10,000 employees, 200 managers, 20 executives, but not even those 20 would qualify as the 1%.
The 1% probably don't even attend the shareholders meeting
>>
>>492028307
This is what you would call a truism. A kind of false proverb that is neither rational nor an argument.
>>
File: capitalismHasFailed.jpg (89 KB, 651x540)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
>>492024877
Get a job faggot
>>
File: 3923782-venom-90s.jpg (90 KB, 1280x720)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>492024877
Why can't we convince them to think like we do?
>>
File: 1685553239671511.jpg (93 KB, 896x889)
93 KB
93 KB JPG
>>492028630
>Always with the Jews.
hey man i am willing to call myself a communist kill rich ceo's and other rich people and even not be homophobic and (openly) racist as long as we get the Jews
>>
>>492024877
cause they are the most capable people per capita. always are. Or else they wouldn't be and maintain their wealth.
>>
>>492024877
The answer is in your own picture. You will kill the actual wealthy people of your country and those who killed the rich will sooner become the new elite and the cycle continues cause no one will ever accept a communist system, not even communist countries are communist, they also have a rulling class way worse than in capitalist societies.
>>
>>492024877
why cant we just kill the poor?

Give me your best leftoid mental gymnastics.
>>
>>492024877
Because they will just hire half of the poor to kill the other half.
>>
>>492029525
Welcome anonymous communist, to the popular front.
>>
>>492029761
My argument is falsifiable, thus the inverse is generally true.

The poor have nothing we need, and individually insignificant, play a key role in production, there would be no benefit in killing them.
If we wiped out the 99%, I doubt the 1% would even survive. They'd all have to fly to new Zealand and become sheapards. That is, I am given to believe, their general contingency plan.

Vanish like the elves, hide out in NZ, then probably sabotage us then claim this as proof they were always needed
>>
>>492025795
Chill dude, you bring actual value to the world & make peoples lives better with your small business. No ones talking about going after people like you
>>
a lesson in humility and knowing your place here, weak-bodied losers

>>492024877
start doing it, pussy. come back and post results. you won't



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.