[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: PRC_population.jpg (70 KB, 686x386)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
Nothing about China's birth rates and population count adds up. It's clearly fabricated. The question is what's the real population? In the absence of transparency, I will go with 1 billion for accounting purposes just because it's a safe average and round number within the spectrum of possibilities.

What's interesting is that throughout the 2000s and 2010s, China claimed to maintain a significantly higher fertility rate than Japan. Then following COVID-19, suddenly China's fertility rate is significantly lower than Japan's. My feeling is that the numbers have been fake since the 1990s or earlier, and COVID-19 gave the perfect excuse to change it dramatically without being questioned and causing an international scandal.

China implemented the One Child Policy in 1979. It was inconsistently enforced by local and provincial governments, like everything in China, but by the 1990s and 2000s it was likely progressively far better enforced. They implemented the Two Child Policy in January 2016, probably hoping that the number would naturally get closer to the fabricated number. It didn't work, so they got rid of all limits beginning in July 2021.
>>
These are figures taken from Google about the fertility rates for China and Japan:

1985 China: 2.63
1985 Japan: 1.76
1988 China: 2.54
1988 Japan: 1.66

1990 China: 2.51
1990 Japan: 1.54
1992 China: 1.78
1992 Japan: 1.50

1995 China: 1.59
1995 Japan: 1.42
1998 China: 1.52
1998 Japan: 1.38

2000 China: 1.63
2000 Japan: 1.36
2002 China: 1.57
2002 Japan: 1.32

2005 China: 1.62
2005 Japan: 1.26
2008 China: 1.70
2008 Japan: 1.37

2010 China: 1.69
2010 Japan: 1.39
2012 China: 1.80
2012 Japan: 1.41

2015 China: 1.67
2015 Japan: 1.45
2017 China: 1.81
2017 Japan: 1.43

2019 China: 1.50
2019 Japan: 1.36
2020 China: 1.28
2020 Japan: 1.33

2021 China: 1.16
2021 Japan: 1.30
2022 China: 1.18
2022 Japan: 1.26
>>
Also watch this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftcLM3502_8
>>
Does it really matter 1 billion more or less? I'm more concerned about Jews pushing more Muslim refugees to places where I live.
>>
>>492087011
agree. think they would be better off even if they had population numbers similar to the US and not to india
too many people just means a lot of idiots that need to be fed
>>
>>492086302
Very interesting
>>
>>492086289
>Then following COVID-19, suddenly China's fertility rate is significantly lower than Japan's
it's the depopulation shot. we are heading towards children of men secenario.
>>
>>492086418
>with the help of ai
my fucking sides kek
>>
File: 1724712742318940.png (276 KB, 1125x1036)
276 KB
276 KB PNG
>>492086289
I think there are well over 2 billion Indians.
>>
File: placesthatdontexist.png (3.75 MB, 1531x928)
3.75 MB
3.75 MB PNG
overpopulation is propaganda, most places in africa foe example don't exist, only on map
>>
>>492086289
There are less chinks than the official number. People forget that china is still mostly a third world shithole. Alot of its stats are guesswork or reliant upon old data.
>>
>>492089626
Overpopulation exists exclusively in bronze-age city state hellholes, but there are enough retards that will go the first 20-50 years of their existence never leaving the concrete prison of NYC or LA and so they think the entire planet is also 30k people per square mile.
>>
>>492086289
World population numbers are all fake. I don't know what they expect to gain from it though, maybe some budget faggotry of sorts.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.