https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odw_KMai2EA>What an empty car park tells us about the UK's debt problemhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy816xdp226o>Madeleine McCann's parents and twin siblings come together to mark the 19th anniversary of her disappearancehttps://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15787073/Madeleine-McCanns-parents-twin-siblings-come-mark-19th-anniversary-disappearance.html>Households paid to take bottles back to Tesco, Asda, Morrisons or Sainsbury’shttps://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2201581/paid-bottles-Tesco-Asda-Morrisons>One-minute jab to treat cancer rolled out on NHShttps://archive.ph/7i0tq>Europe must face up to ‘tensions’ with Trump, Keir Starmer sayshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/04/europe-must-face-up-to-tensions-with-trump-keir-starmer-says>Starmer accused of ‘unpicking Brexit’ as UK faces paying EU £1bn a year after ‘reset’https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-brexit-reset-eu-uk-pay-armenia-b2969999.html>Brixton shooting: Gun attack which put four in hospital could be linked to south London stabbing, police sayhttps://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/brixton-shooting-linked-south-london-stabbing-b1280916.html>Starmer says benefit of joining EU’s £78bn Ukraine loan scheme 'outweighs cost'https://www.itv.com/news/2026-05-03/uk-to-enter-talks-on-joining-eus-78bn-loan-scheme-for-ukraine>Ed Miliband ‘passes up leadership bid to target role as chancellor’https://archive.ph/vjnke
miku is laughing at us on miku monday
>>534442886filtered
why is it restore policy to put migrants in "patriotic" areas?
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2026-05-01/ty-article-opinion/.premium/netanyahu-will-go-but-the-state-will-die-with-him/0000019d-e008-d0b2-a3bf-e029502f0000>Netanyahu Will Go, but the State Will Die With Himwe're so back
>>534442700>We won't punish hardworking British men and women because their neighbours voted GreenKekked.
>>534442952Based
>>534442952seether is in>>534443029on his proxy
>>534442700Don't care voting Reform
>>534443055based numerals confirm
>>534442956Its not policy.
What are we expecting for the election this week lads? I'm thinking Labour will win but barely, Greens and Reform will do decently which will make Stramer seethe, things go on as usual with no real change promised. if not a major Labour win then I'm thinking a three way coalition between Labour-Greens-Reform
>>534442952This
>>534443058Kek
>>534443107Downes is literally restore's spokesperson
Obvious caveat being that this is all just focusing on illegals (10s-of-thousands p/a) to avoid talking about the legals (100s-of-thousands p/a), but:A) In an electoral system, you don't always get what you vote for. Should the 10.5k Reform voters in Gorton & Denton be collectively punished alongside the 26.3k who voted for all other candidates? Particularly when that result, and similar results in other constituencies across the north, are downstream of demographic replacement in the first place. They've already been flooded with Pakis, and now you're saying you're going to punish them for being made minorities by making it even worse.B) Reform have insisted that these detention centres would be proper ones, detaining migrants and not letting them free roam, and that the migrants would not be able to inflict anti-social crime on the local areas. So, they insist, it's not actually a 'punishment'. So what is it? And why make it partisan? It's just red meat, gesturing at 'rubbing the left's nose in it', while also swearing up-and-down that no discomfort will actually come of it to affect them anyway. Pure posturing, trying to look hard.C) The priority must be getting them deported ASAP, and any detentions centres should be located to make that process as fast and efficient as possible. Detain them in dockside shipping containers if it gets them out faster, IDGAF, just focus on getting them gone, not on immiserating your own countrymen for not being sufficiently enthused about your party, or for living in the 'wrong' postcode.D) The Greens don't want detention centres at all. They want illegals to be given visas and council houses. They aren't just being hypocritical NIMBYs, they're operating from completely different fundamentals. I know Reform think this is clever turnabout, "[making] the enemy live up to its own book of rules," a la Alinsky, but it's just not. They're simply declaring that they'll implement their own rules in the most spiteful way possible.
>>534443058
>>534443204He's not a policymaker.
>>534443132all the polls show labour in like 4th place, reform in first, greens in second, tories in third and labour in forth
>>534442956why is it reform policy to put migrants in council seats?
>>534442956>Recognises the contradiction between Reform's insistence that detention centres won't have a negative impact Vs their implicit deployment of them as a threat>"... and therefore, it's actually GOOD thing!"He really is a retard, isn't he?
>>534443055I filtered you too lmao
We're watching Children of Men lads in 20 minutes lads.
>>534443327the absolute state of filterspastics
>>534443345nigger we're watching Children of Men every day
>>534443345No thanks
>>534443263lmao, restore tards want to make a 'serious grown up political party' and think their chief spokesperson and campaigns director can just run his mouthit is OFFICIAL restore policy to put migrant rapists in white areas- at least in time until grandad finds his meds and is allowed to do a softball interview on sargon's youtube channel
>>534443390>stub
>>534443345Not watching the snooker, it's down to the line
>>534443453also filtered
>>534443345bogdan is just watching children
>>534443132Labour wipeout because everyone's fed up, prompting someone to launch their palace coup against Starmer and try and take the party leadership from him. Probably Streeting, as his major obstacle would be Burnham getting selected for an upcoming by-election, winning, and then being able to contest the leadership
>>534443345<
>>534443415Where's the policy?
>>534443528>JEWtopkekbut filtered
>>534443493Do one
>>534443453Fuck off dickhead.>hurr "FR Gramps" ...everyone needs to know it's me.You absolute sad act giving yourself a nickname.
>>534443614How was the bbq?
>>534443548Pathetic
>>534443659Yeah but now you can put his name in and you don't have to filter him each thread, namefag was always going to be his final form
Hindu rape rats get no investigation into their rape gangs?
>>534443745it absolutely helps, i had to filter all french flags and they're not all bad, it's just him. now i can just filter his namefag name. I'm sure this is why the nonce doesn't namefag/tripfag any more. because he would just get filtered
>>534443665Good, but got sunburnt
listening to old XFM broadcastings makes me sad.back in a time where the average mong could afford a house, see a doctor and feel hopeful about anything.
>>534443228>third world "democratic" norms introduced by Mohammed YusufImagine my total lack of shock
>>534443826>I'm sure this is why the nonce doesn't namefag/tripfag any more. because he would just get filteredAbsolutely
>>534443681>it's just like Nazi Germany it is must be hell for the government, importing mudslimes who then attack their masters lol
>>534443058O I am laffin
ffs, chinks winning snooker 2 years in a row. its looking ogre.
>>534444421At least the White Man will always have darts
>>534444072devil horns are a jewish trope?I'm brit/pol's premier antisemite and this is news to me
>>534444421Snooker is for paedos
>>534444559you're brainfried. you'll never have a passion or happiness in life.
>>534444072She looks good for someone who was around in 1933
>>534444598I have both
>>534444559>everything I don't like is nonce adjacentThink you're a nonce desu.
>>534444552No matter how long you've been in the game there's always more to learn, that's why we're out here grindin' every damn day
just spotted this on the beeb
>>534444552>>534444740They don't like being compared to their god.
>>534443681harsh but fair
>>534444961Isn't that election interference? The media are NOT allowed to report on it.
Why doesn't britpol care about Hindu rape gangs?
>he's still kvetching
>>534445237>this againBrush your teeth.
>>534445376>>534445290Not an argument. Why don't you care about Hindu rape gangs? Tell me if you're not a jeet
>>534445491Funny how you capitalise the h.
>>534444686Prefer pool
>>534444421Can't believe the little chink done it.He played well tbf.
>>534445601Funny how that was reported to the police and they just straight up refused to investigate it.
>>534445601>>534445714Searching snooker nonce just brings up Graeme Dott.
Why did the entirety of /pol/ just disappear for a minute?
>>534445574Not an argument.
>>534445574>Stupid jeet doesn't know phones autocorrect What a surprise
>>534445990>>534446101>doubleposting
>>534446191lmaooo
>>534446191Hindu rape rats are gangraping young girls but you Dont care?
>>534446101>He hasn't already deleted all the capitalised autocorrects for races / religions / ethnicities / countries he doesn't like yet.
>>534446613Proper nouns are capital letters. Are you ESL?
Space is a lie created by the freemasons
>>534446191Auschwitz packed lunch?
>>534446613Soffa enjineer.>>534446770Kek.
we are enteringa newera
>>534447022Am not
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/03/welfare-pays-more-than-work-for-600k-households/>More than 600,000 households received more in benefits than the average worker’s salary, *the first analysis of its kind has revealed*...The analysis, by the Conservatives, also revealed that...29th of August 2025.https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/newsroom/welfare-pays-moreKemi is a lazy plaigarist and the CSJ's "Wasted Youth" was in social policy circles about as well known as Taylor Swift. Maybe these lazy yoofs should get a job writing for the Telegraph, apparently they'll accept any old lazy shit.
am in new era lads
>>534447295The political nuance often lost in this debate lies in the "framing" of the data. Both sides of the aisle use these figures to support specific ideological goals, often by omitting the mechanics of how the money is actually spent.Here are the primary layers of misrepresentation and political nuance:1. The "Middleman" Misrepresentation (The Housing Loophole)Politically, these figures are often framed as cash in the pockets of claimants. However, for a significant portion of those 600,000 households, a large chunk of that "income" is Housing Benefit.The Nuance: In high-rent areas, the government pays the landlord directly (or provides the tenant the money specifically for rent). The claimant never "sees" this money in terms of lifestyle or disposable income.The Political Twist: By including housing costs in the "welfare" total, the data can make it look like a family is living a high-income lifestyle, when in reality, they are simply living in an area with high property values where the government is effectively subsidizing the private rental market.2. The "Individual vs. Household" FallacyThe comparison often pits a household’s total benefits against an individual’s average salary.The Nuance: A household receiving £35,000 in benefits might be supporting two parents and four children, some with disabilities. Comparing that to the take-home pay of one single worker is an "apples-to-oranges" comparison.The Political Twist: This framing suggests that "not working" is more lucrative than "working," ignoring that a working household with multiple children and similar needs would likely also be eligible for top-ups like Child Benefit or Universal Credit on top of their salary.
>>5344475023. The "Cost of Disability" ErasureA significant number of those in the 600,000 bracket are receiving PIP (Personal Independence Payment) or other disability-related premiums. The Nuance: Disability benefits are not intended to replace a wage; they are designed to cover the additional costs of living with a disability (specialized transport, heating, care, or equipment). The Political Twist: By grouping disability payments into the general "welfare pays more" narrative, the specific, non-negotiable costs of being disabled are ignored to make the total figure look "excessive."4. The Benefit Cap as a Political ToolThe Benefit Cap was a flagship policy of the 2010s intended to ensure no one on benefits earned more than the average family. The Nuance: The existence of 600,000 households "above" this level suggests the cap is "failing." However, many of these families are exempt from the cap because they are working a certain number of hours or have severe disabilities. The Political Twist: Highlighting these numbers allows politicians to argue for "tightening" the cap or reassessing eligibility, even if the households in question are the ones the system originally deemed the most in need of protection.
>>5344475365. Regional VariationAn "average salary" buys a very different lifestyle in different parts of the country. The Nuance: In the North of England, £32,000 might be a comfortable middle-class wage. In London, it is often below the poverty line for a family. The Political Twist: Using a national average (the "UK worker") flattens the reality that many of these high-benefit households are simply located in areas where the cost of survival (specifically rent) is astronomical.Summary of the "Take"The debate isn't really about the data—the data is largely accurate. The debate is about what benefits are for. If you believe benefits are a minimal safety net to prevent starvation, then these numbers look like a failure of the work incentive. If you believe benefits are a social stabilizer meant to account for the high cost of disability, housing, and childcare, then these numbers are a reflection of how expensive those things have become in the UK.
>>534446800You are ESL jeet go back to speaking Urdu. White man's language is too hard for you.
>>534447502Thanks for that ChatGPT.Still. I love this Tory "research". What they did is read the CSJ report from last year which used the figure for living wage (1m+) and then look up the average wage and then somehow they are being treated like Stephen Hawking.The deeper issue here is that the Tories lack the resource to do any kind of "analysis" and if they had any capacity they'd be spending on working out where their fucking voters are for Thursday because they still have no idea. The Tory "ground game" in terms of getting out the vote is non-existent and they have no data. Being a party for the over-70s comes with some inherent drawbacks.
>>534447658gemini, way better, way more objectiveyeah its just talking pointsevery single party is just trying to pit one block against another with seethe fuel and lies atm because they're all on the ropes. well, I've not seen this from the greens actually, or restore. but all the others yeah
>>534447626>You are ESL jeetESL moment.
>>534447752bloc*
>>534447821No one likes you poopesh.
>>534443132Labour will do badly but overperform the polling. The "quiet Labour voter" is a thing now. Reform will do well be underperform the polling, its just a fundamental thing with them that the more people see of them, the less they like them. The Greens will do more or less as expected, their vote is quite concentrated and easy to read. The Lib Dems will be judged the losers.
https://youtu.be/HzNmrTOifao?si=UeVdq3xMvHfzl4_qomg winston churchill ordered the anthrax mass bombing of germany but was superseded due to the geneva convention!!!!rudolph hess flew to scotland on a peace mission and was imprisoned for 'crimes against peace' for 46 years in spandau prison, so heckin based dood!!!omg 300 000 joos all starved to death in the camps in the last 3 weeks of the war omg dood
>>534447912>>534440953
>>534436797>Immigrants didn't build our country - British men and women didNot true of course, see pic related. In 2011, 11% of England's construction workforce were immigrants (born outside the UK). I'm sure that proportion will be higher these days. Source:https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/articles/migrantlabourforcewithintheconstructionindustry/august2018So the question is, why are "Restore Britain" liars? Why do they paint some whitewashed picture of the UK which isn't factually true?
Bye bye shitty pandering Labour councillorsHello maniac muslim independent for gaza councillors, or possibly green muslim beards
>>534447945https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cast_Thy_Bread>>534448085Try pleasing everyone and then everyone hates you. Funny that. Almost as if people have an ingrained preference.
>>534448076>whitewashedSo we're assuming all migrants are brown now huh.
>>534448037Kys josh you fat greasy paedophile.
>>534448076>11% of England's construction workforce were immigrantsIn 2011, immigrants were 13.8% of England's population (7,337,139 / 53,012,456 total)
>>534448268>rumbledKek
>>534448037lol that is pathetic
