[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1672498500163864.jpg (47 KB, 702x663)
47 KB JPG
Why are leftists so obsessed with sources?
>>
>>535081184
>>>/b/
>>>/bant/
>>>/trash/
>>
>>535081184
Because truth matters

/thread
>>
>>535081184
Their whole life revolves around authority.
>>
>>535081184
Because "it came to me during a schizophrenic episode" is retarded.
>>
Why are rightoids so obsessed with saying random unsubstantiated bullshit
>>
>>535081294
>>535081341
source?
>>
>>535081184
It is just a personal attack via an appeal to authority. They are not sincere about it and once you do give a source they will directly attack the source too, even if it is a source they approve of.
>>
>>535081184
Because they have been programmed to never bear any responsibility or have an original thought especially if this thought does not echo established scientific theories.
>>
>>535081399
Idk, why are you?
>>
I stopped playing their game after they just ignored the study showing that diversity has downsides.
>>
>>535081415
Vishnu.
>>
>>535081341
>it came to me from some burnout Jew working in over priced university
>it came to me from AI that sourced the Jews
>it came to me from wikipedia that was highly edited to cater to an obvious agenda
>sure there are other sources totally invalidating my argument but this source is sponsored by pfizer
so much better.
>>
File: Source.jpg (57 KB, 702x663)
57 KB JPG
>>535081299
This

Also, leftists don't really care about sources per se -- they only care about using the calling for sources as a tactic to wear down their targets and create the illusion of falsehood in their targets

Welcome to Leftists
>>
>>535081184
The notion that their beliefs make them 'educated', 'rational' and 'intellectual' is a powerful motivation for the typical progressive, any discussion must be a cargo cult-esque imitation of the Scientific Process where if you fail to find 'evidence' against even their subjective claims you must be stupid, uneducated, unduly emotionally motivated and insane
>>
>>535081184
Real question: Why are they so adverse to making black people cite their claims?
>>
>>535081184
you made this thread yesterday kike and got blown the fuck out
>>
>>535081184
I asked one of my wife's boyfriends why and he said a bunch of stuff about how trust is earned and all these other mental gymnastics. I think they just like making life harder for themselves.
>>
>>535081676
>want to tell him to show flag
>it'll be a burger flag
>it's still be a meme flag

Vishnu told me about this.
>>
>>535081399
>random unsubstantiated bullshit
I never came across a rightoid who tried to convince me of 72 genders or sex swaps or that women are 1:1 equals to men. I don't keep a list but the absurdity the left propagates isn't based in reality either.
>>
>>535081429
This. Giving sources to miggers is pointless. No matter what it is, even if it's from Trump's own government data, it's still "fake news." The ONLY thing they believe is whatever comes out of Trump's mouth.

They're sick, sad individuals.
>>
>>535081184
>no inferences
>no observation
That's the most retarded thing I've ever heard and explains why leftists make such shitty researchers.
>>
>>535081855
*of what the left
>>
>>535081184
Because their #1 tactic (aside from accusing everyone they don't like of being "pedophiles" since "Nazi" doesn't hold any weight these days) is to wear their opponents down with requests in an attempt to make them appear ignorant or dumb.

>"Oh, so you can't provide a peer reviewed study showing that race exists? Oh, you can? Well who financed the study? Hmmmm? What are the credentials of the researchers? Don't know off the top of your head? BOY ARE YOU STUPID!"

Anyone who has watched 5 minutes of Destiny "debating" knows this is how it always goes down.
>>
>>535081184
Its easier than ever to provide sources for anything. The dumber things like 1+1=2 are in elementary school math books. The complicated too. Weirder things are written about too. Not hard to ask some AI to list you sources.
>>
>>
>>535081294
spbp
>>
>>535081184
>general deference to authority
>over-socialized and concerned for their social standing, desperate to sound clever so mindlessly imitate academic practices outside the need to easily link articles together
>golden opportunity to instantly shut down any dissent or discussion by contesting the source
>lower risk taking (unless it's sexual decadence then they make an exception towards high risk)
It's a mystery.
>>
>>535081814
How much Izzat did you need to summon Vishnu? That's a lot of street shitting and white girl dry humping on the train I imagine.
>>
>>535082133
>flag
>>
>>535081184
They’re not they just use it as a deflection tactic. They argue almost exclusively with logical fallacies so of course genetic fallacy is among them. It goes as such
>post/say x
>source?
>give source for x
>erm that does not count because [insert genetic fallacy]
And then they just spend the rest trying and failing to justify it while going in circles.
>>
File: steamed-data-shorter.png (199 KB, 649x428)
199 KB PNG
>>535081294
>Truth
May I see it?
>>
>>535082199
Yes, all Swiss flags are Jeets(Praty) until proven mountain kikes.
>>
>>535081341
They need sources on basic shit. Like they can't even accept that importing primarely poor, uneducated men from deeply sexist and homophobic cultures will increase crime and be especially bad for women and fags.

Even though every leftist dipshit blames all domestic crime on poverty, poor education and males. It should be obvious that importing poor, uneducated men would boost crime rates even to them. But no, they need a source on that.

They're retarded
>>
>>
>>535082133
>>
>>535081184
If your goal was to false flag b8 post to make rightoids seem retarded, well done.
I'm pretty much forced to assume that's your goal because you accomplished it so well
>>
>>535081184
They're not, it's a disingenuous to tire you out in the hope you either give up or get angered by their bullshit so they can claim victory. In a non-jew controlled society, we'd just beat the shit out of those niggers.
>>
>>535082551
If voting and participation in politics was directly tied to conscription, the leftoids would keep their mouths shut on politics and policies. You probably won't find a source on this but it's true.
>>
>>535083858
Well fighting for jewish economic zones is fucking stupid so I don't see your point
>>
>>535084182
>Fighting for jewish economic zones
You're in the jewish system regardless but it wasn't always like this and in places like North Korea, Iran or China and if they were fighting, they would be doing so for their own interests and you leftist retards on the one hand reap the jewish rewards and on the other coward your way out when push comes to shove.take the jew vaxx wilfully so your argument isn't really an argument
>Refusing to die for jews
The left were the biggest vaxx consumers so I also fail to see your point.
>>
File: 1684566858654862.jpg (159 KB, 725x1024)
159 KB JPG
>>535081184
They only started doing that after the long march through the institutions was complete. You never saw source spamming from the left when they didn't control academia.
They control the scientific funding, the journals, the peer review process, and they decide who gets PhDs. This creates an insular academia, so that any dissenting voices can be labelled as anti-science. The soviet union did the same thing but faster and more violently. Remember that communist countries used to call it "scientific socialism" when it was first rolled out.
Personally, I've noticed that the biggest source spammers have never read a methodology section and couldn't explain the difference between a z-score or p-value if their life depended on it.

TLDR: They dont care about truth, only power. Present them a truth that disempowers them and watch them squirm.
>>
>>535081184
Because they went to college and many of you retarded Republicans clearly didn't.

>>535081299
Republicans keep pretending like they don't love authority.
>>
>>535085665
Ted Kaczynski was denouncing this phenomena decades ago. Peer-review is nothing more than font-checking, if you have the correct font you can cheat like a retarded 5 year old and no one will ever even notice. That Harvard bitch in sociology cheated her studies so badly she put completely invalid answers in many times and no one noticed before some boomer colleagues looked at it for fun, not because of peer-review, but because they thought it'd be a fun idea that day. She had been cheating for years writing "Napoleon" to "what is 3+4" and nobody noticed anything, in what is to the ears of most people at least the most prestigious university in the world.
>>
>>535081184
Shouldn’t everyone be?
If you can’t back up your point, you are probably making it up
>>
>>535081184
because retards fabricate and misquote things frequently. I suspect this has something to do with your interest in the topic.
>>
>>535085769
>college
Oh you mean Jewish leftie indoctrination camp?
>>
>>535081184
Meanwhile these retarded faggots repeat every orange man bad thing they have been told to repeat despite having literally nothing to back up their shit talk. They're, you know, shitbag losers.
>>
>>535081184
Their ideology doesn't work in the real world so obviously they would also reject your observations of the real world
>>
File: 1686080680766398.webm (2.32 MB, 720x406)
2.32 MB
2.32 MB WEBM
>>535085769
>credentialism = intelligence
>academic corruption doesn't exist
>expertism is my religion
>doctors said I have to troon my kids, who are you to tell me otherwise
>thalidomide babies never happened and/or im glad it did
>if they fake a study telling me to drink mercury I'll fucking do it
>It's called scientific socialism chud, it's totally true.
keep getting educated anon, just one more degree and you'll finally smooth out that last brain wrinkle.
>>
>>535082440
Half of them aren't retarded but pretending to be retarded. They only care about winning so if acting like an idiot makes you get bored and walk away then that's a price they're willing to pay to win that argument
>>
>>535081680
Its not you fucking idiot. Retards are the one making vague statements of authority without actually providing the link to where and how the analysis was actually done. Sources for information are required for stating proofs.
>>
>>535081676
It's like their Holohoax "sources," which is literally just jews referring to what other jews wrote at some point in time. After a few digs you find a lot of it is based on literally hearsay and some horseshit. This is what they point to as "evidence." Not actual evidence, but someone said something once and someone else referenced it.
>>
>>535085988
is there anything that nigga was wrong about?
>>
>>535081184
nice try, they arent and thats the problem
>>
I keep telling leftists this, but when you start asking for a source, all it shows is that you're uninformed about the subject you're trying to converse about, and you should do more reading on it. It's crazy the amount of times where I talk about something like how they mapped allele prevalence between races and genes associated positively with intelligence show up more in white populations, and genes associated negatively with intelligence show up more in black populations, and the person just replies "sounds like bullshit, source?". Nigger why do you even have a fucking opinion on the matter if you're so uninformed that you don't know about this? I'm not your fucking personal google machine who has to hand feed you information because you're too intellectually lazy to look shit up. If you WERE informed, you wouldn't be asking for a source, you would be telling me why that information is right/wrong according to your knowledge. I don't think I've ever asked someone for a source on something. If they say something I'm unaware of, I'm well aware of how to search for something on my own.

No wonder these people are fucking idiots, they just want to be hand-fed information.
>>
>>535086490
Doesn't seem like it. His end-goal was basically impossible, wishing for Total Technology Death, but he admitted that it was probably never going to happen, at least not willingly. And he only mentions "nazis" twice in all of Industrial Revolution, and both times he says things that are true and not jewish myths.
>>
File: 1683031587806300.jpg (117 KB, 1018x1024)
117 KB JPG
>>535085988
this
so much of expertism is the false assumption that "they must be trustworthy because they have the job". Lucy Letby murdered at least 7 babies as a neonatal nurse without anyone noticing. She was about to kill way more when a colleague (a white older male in a different department btw) decided he'd had enough of "expertism" and "women are wonderful" and actually investigated her. To this fucking day the system runs cover for this evil bitch.

This little nigger: >>535085769 goons to the idea of people in authority murdering his kids. He can't wait to simp for Lucy Letby. He fucking LOVES science.
>>
>>535081184
Because they are women and want to practice reputation destruction with the sources.
>>
>>535086638
lel what a bizarre thing to talk about a "crazy amount of times" all just to show that the mean and median value of huge, overlapping populations are slightly different.
>>
>I will only accept your argument if someone else has already made it and institutionalized it for me.
All leftists are slaves to authority, more so than any other political idea. They are outsourcing thought.
>>
File: embryos haeckel.png (382 KB, 1619x645)
382 KB PNG
>>535086638
It's just bullshitting to tire you out. And it gets everyone on the receiving end angry because it's obviously bullshit, no one honestly ever acts like this, when you speak to a non-mentally ill person and you tell them "The other day, I was at a restaurant with a friend" they don't ask you for "SOURCE?!!! I need your GPS data, written testimony of this "friend" of yours, testimony of at least 3 employees of the restaurants and video feeds of the area at this exact time".

When a honest person asks for sources, they do so out of actual curiosity and they're asking for indications, like what kind of place you found it at, they're not asking you to spell an entire URL from memory.

>>535086695
It makes them infuriating when they brandish their nu-religion being vastly more fanatical than any average person at the peak of the Inquisition, and dare to accuse others of being religious for not believing in their religious myth like evolutionism. They'll teach kids for 150 years with a straight face something they've known since the beginning was a blatant forgery, and they won't feel shame. Lucy "our ancestor" was officially debunked the year I was born, and it's still to this day presented in popular culture as relevant and not a retarded deliberate misinterpretation of some random monkey's bones.
>>
>>535086745
That slight difference is largely responsible for the IQ gap between races, stupid, and why nearly all social interventions keep failing to produce any results, and why thus affirmative action policies and anything related to them, only dumb down sectors which have no business being dumbed down.

You're a good example of the person I talked about. Someone who talks about something they know nothing about.
>>
>>535086929
this. you never see a rightwinger appeal to the bible or some sort of religious authority.
>>
>>535086638
It's called a leftist struggle session. They already know about the data in a lot of cases, but aim to exhaust you by repeatedly asking for an explanation, intentionally getting it wrong until you re-enage as often as possible. They are not looking for any sort of genuine dialogue with you. The right does that sometimes too, but at least there is an actual goal towards the truth there.
>>
>>535086996
lmao that sure made you boil. you're also falling for the low-iq trap that individuals necessarily represent a group average.
>>
>>535087010
Are you claiming the state isn't secular? What a retarded thought.
>>
>>535087040
They just come here to test out propaganda before they shit it out on Reddit and twitter. It doesn't have to fool us, just be too hard to refute for the laymen who will just give up
>>
>>535086345
>Sources for information are required for stating proofs
Not only are they not required, but they inherently weaken the argument because it introduces another point of doubt. The best arguments are the ones that require no outside proof, and can prove themselves using only their own premises. For example, you don't need a source or data of any kind to argue that morality is objective, and any argument towards morality that relies on an outside source can safely be discarded as an appeal to an unqualified authority.
>>
File: leftists will just lie.png (58 KB, 1841x448)
58 KB PNG
>>535087128
>>
They don't like the idea of people thinking for themselves so they're constantly looking for an authority figure to validate their beliefs.
>>
>>535086345
Normative claims do not require a source, not even in an academic context.
>>
>>535081184
Arguing on the internet is a really dumb thing to do. I know I used to do it all the time. It is just annoying. You will never change the other person's mind. And no matter what you both think, you won. If you are foolish enough to get into an argument and then even more foolish enough to provide a source, what can happen is just hours of you and the other guy just trading links.

Side note: conservatives are massive retards who are wrong about everything except trannies and immigration.
>>
>>535087174
The reason for this, by the way, is that most of leftist thought is based on relativism. If everything is relative, then a lie doesn't matter anymore. At least in their diseased minds, that is.
>>
>>535087282
>conservatives are massive retards who happen to be correct on the most pressing issue of the modern world, namely immigration
Guess I'm gonna keep supporting the retards then.
>>
>>535087232
Well they control the institutions so they think that makes them right, that's why they were so obsessed with peer reviewing because anything in the last 20 years that doesn't fit the utopian message is spiked into the garbage. But they also have completely eroded trust in institutions and media. But reading leftist sources usually isn't bad because they usually betray the lie in their studies. So the actual hurdle to discussion is your own willingness to inform yourself and their main tactic is to shame people into ignorance
>>
>>535087074
>you're also falling for the low-iq trap that individuals necessarily represent a group average.

Are you stupid? It was a population study moron, THOSE ARE THE AVERAGES.
>>
>>535087119
i assume you're confused because this isn't your frist language. but your post is retarded
>>
>>535087153
Morality is objective to actual human beings, who go from the axiom that life = good. But leftists and all manners of egalitarians have been in a death cult for thousands of years, they fundamentally believe that life is evil and they must rebel against all of life, always starting with the purest forms, those being the natural leaders, the Aryans, the men, the straight, the intelligent, the beautiful, the strong, the courageous, the honest...

So no, leftists will argue that killing 2.5 billion babies in 50 years, vastly more deaths than all wars in all of human history, is a good thing because they hate you. The Weathermen (a jewish marxist organization) 50 years ago was already directly saying that "killing all White babies" was a good thing. Our enemies are insane, psychotic, pure evil, and they must be exterminated as such. All fully-fledged leftists must have their brains bashed in with a hammer.

>>535087321
Which is why since I was 16, I've wanted to kill them, because that's genuinely anti-human. My reasoning was "If everything is relative, then there is no point in ever even talking, they would rob us of our voice, our capacity to reason and think, they would turn us into mindless literal animals, and I would much rather kill every single one of them than accept this fate".
>>
>>535081184
Probably the same teason rightoids desperately look for any research that gives credence to their thoughts. There are hylics on both sides
>>
>>535087469
Anthropology is the only source non socialists need
>>
>>535087415
no, you're just getting too flustered to understand what you're reading. Obviously many of the interverentions that you're referencing (a very broad and general set of loosely-related measures that all apparently have one single primary determinant of success) aren't applied to all members of a given race. Affirmative action, for example, would generally benefit a disproportionately someone higher on the distribution of black IQs at the expense of someone lower on the distribution of white IQs. Thus you are saying that a given individual, or a subset of a population that is determined through a selective bias, can be assessed based on averages or overall distributions of a certain trait across the total population. Are you stupid?
>>
>>535087422
They'll argue it, but their argument will be weak. And the more sources they use, the weaker it will get.

Those of us who reason, on the other hand, can lay out a fully cogent argument for objective morality from nothing other than first principles. My point is that the relationship between proof and outside sources is the inverse of what most people tend to assume. The more sources needed to make the point, the weaker the argument. The fewer sources needed to make the point, the stronger the argument. Each new source is a new point to be doubted and questioned, and no argument can stand if it has premises more dubious than its conclusion.
>>
>>535081184
appeal to authority, credentialism is their god
>>
>>535081294
Gonna need a source on that, chuddie.
>>
>>535087689
this dumbass thinks muh leftists are asking for sources in philosophical debates instead of simple claims about things that did or didn't occur.
>>
File: rightcantmeme history.jpg (2.63 MB, 1920x3443)
2.63 MB JPG
>>535087689
Absolutely. But when it comes to intellectual discourse, even thousands of leftists combined cannot defeat a single boomer meme on facebook as picrel shows. I've seen those retards unironically "fact-check" a caricature, going "akshually, Trump isn't a 6 meters tall space warrior".
>>
>>535081871
>bring up trump and "miggers" out of no where
Lol. Lmfao even. TDS is real and that's so funny. You can't go one second without thinking about trump. The dude lives rent free in your head lol.
>>
Why don't conservatives read books or the news? Conservatives get all their news from X and Facebook and actively avoid using real sources.
>>
>>535087823
It applies no matter the context. For example, I could have proven to you beyond reasonable doubt that the covid shots were going to be harmful well before any data came out against them. And this is exactly the kind of argument in which leftists would demand sources while ignoring the core of your argument. The same can be said of the importance of racial homogeneity, the incoherence of transgenderism and pretty much every other big leftist belief.
>>
>>535085988
I know we are mocking them, but can I get a source on that lying about research? I believe you and i dont think you're lying, and Uncle Ted is right and all that, but I wanna read about this lady that was faking everything and didn't get caught until after the fact. Sounds hilarious.
>>
>>535087385
Honestly, I can't really blame you. Like, yes, conservatives are usually wrong because most of them are really stupid. But a broken clock is right twice a day. And those are two issues worth caring about. It's almost too bad that Trump had to sperg out, resulting in both Canada and Australia electing left-leaning governments. Although the liberals in Canada have become more right-wing now. Not sure about Australia. I do find it funny when conservatives in Canada complain about the liberal government, because they are doing what the conservatives want. Although it would be better if we got rid of more immigrants and built even more houses.
>>
>>535081184
yeah, why can't they just fall for fake twitter screencaps like us based guys?
>>
>>535088087
I believe it was that woman https://nypost.com/2024/03/16/us-news/harvard-professor-of-honesty-tampered-with-data-and-should-be-fired-probe/
Easy to find by typing something like "Harvard sociology cheat". Also google is turbo-jewish, I mainly use Luxxle and Yandex.
>>
>>535087683
Dummy, the entire purpose of affirmative action is based on the idea of systemic injustice being the cause of the low intellectual placement of blacks as a WHOLE. If they were judged on individual merits then affirmative action wouldn't exist. IQ is largely heritable, and the differences we see between races have a genetic basis. The assumption is that it's social woes that cause the gap. It's not. Thus any kind of social justice interventions, are based on a FALSE assumption. There are more stupid blacks per capita, than there are stupid whites per capita, hence, seeing more white people be in more successful positions and in a greater proportion of higher end schooling, is what you would expect, rather than being some kind of injustice.

I don't think you know what you're even talking about. You seem to be making this presumption of the kind of argument I'm making, when I'm not. I never once talked about individuals, I was always talking about group averages.
>>
>>535088051
no, you're incorrect. If someone makes a blatantly counterfactual claim, then it makes sense to question the source of the information. For example, a shocking number of posters on this board expose themselves as underage or plainly low IQ when they attempt to discuss macroeconomics. The number of flasehoods posted weekly about the methodology of CPI alone is comical. And the source of their confusion is important, because it's not a simple smattering of misconstrued interpretations of a document -- lots of the confusion is conspicuously sourced from the same set of agitators/grifters who seem to have misled them on purpose.
>>
>>535088409
i know you weren't talking about individuals, that was genuinely and explicitly my entire point, smoothbrain. You are giving explanatory power to group averages in circumstances where they might not have as much explanatory power as you desire, for the specific reason that I cited.

tell me more about how you think other people are confused.
>>
>>535088191
I use Brave search but didn't have anything to go one. My query was "woman lying in academia" and I could really pin down anything. Thanks for the link!
>>
>>535088690
>woman lying in academia
>>
>>535081184
To combat harmful misinformation
>>
>>535088427
>then it makes sense to question the source of the information
The kind of argument I'm talking about doesn't have outside information at all. The information needed is contained within itself. It rests on its own internal consistency and coherency, without needing to appeal to something outside of itself. That's what makes it strong and free from dubious premises.

For example, I can undercut whatever economical argument you're trying to make by pointing out that any economy based on a currency being printed by a private international bank is a farce from the outset, and that all healthy economics depend on having a sound and non-inflationary currency managed by the government alone. My argument here doesn't depend on anything, because what I've just stated is self-evident, and any argument to the contrary is self-refuting.
>>
>>535081184
Literally me
>>
>>535081184
America is a third world. You better trust me and not ask for a source of this claim, lefty.

I accept your concession btw.
>>
>>535088559
>i know you weren't talking about individuals

You literally claimed earlier I was by saying I was falling for the trap " that individuals necessarily represent a group average.". If you're claiming you know I wasn't talking about individuals, then there was never any "trap" that I fell for.

>You are giving explanatory power to group averages in circumstances where they might not have as much explanatory power as you desire

>where they might not have as much explanatory power as you desire

Can you quote where I'm showing a "desire" that what I'm saying doesn't have explanatory power, and what alternative you have?

Your entire string of replies seem to essentially be "no no no you're wrong", but you offer zero in return as an alternative explanation.
>>
File: 1774526262590761.jpg (101 KB, 1024x515)
101 KB JPG
>>535081184
>Why are leftists so obsessed with sources?
It's completely valid to ask for a source. Of course a person can be a nuissance asking for sources for trivial statements. But what the REAL problem with debating leftists is, you give them a source. It could be completely air-tight, like a large and well funded university study with 10,000 respondents, and you present it to the leftist, he will go and type in the study name in wikipedia, scroll to the criticism section (which 99% of the time amounts to veiled leftist whinging that the results were politically incorrect) and copypaste verbatim. Usually something like "Dr. Shekelstein said there was a methodology flaw". You ask what the methodology flaw was, they never answer because that was never included in the wikipedia article. You look up Dr. Shekelstein and find that in his "rebuttal" he misquoted and misinterpreted the study and his criticism was thrown out. The leftist, meanwhile continues to insist that the valid source is "not valid" with only the vaguest of assertions why, but then will have the gall to forward you to a study that supports his conclusion. You look it up, it has a sample size of 30 voluntary respondents, all of which were found in a gay bar. And he will never attempt to defend this, only deflect or post more studies, all of which have a heavily biased sample size of 30-60. And he will still say this is better methodology than the 10,000 respondent study you posted.
>>
lol, as if that just doesn't prove you guys are retarded or have an agenda to push yourself. So much of 4chan is filled with retards that just take anything at face value these days. Gone are the days of, "fake and gay", and all anyone has to do is spam their lies constantly and with enough frequency that people think it is true even when it's not.
>>
>>535081299
Correct. And I not only went to college, I got a PhD and taught at college, and this sort of random "appeal to authority", but only certain authorities, is the opposite of clear thinking.

Intellectually the left is a house of cards, and they dare not let any unexpected breeze blow on it.
>>
>>535087888
>The man who controls the future of the world lives rent free in your head durrr
Rent free means you're obsessing about someone who has no effect on your life. Trump does, you stupid faggot.
>>
>>535081294
>truth matters
so why don’t you show us your true location?
>>
>>535087888
It would be more accurate to append the TDS label to MAGA itself, since their cult of personality around Trump has exceeded any cult of personality in recorded history.
>>
>>535089417
Something I definitely noticed arguing with leftists is that they will attempt to nitpick every tiny little thing about any source you provide, but they are completely blind to their own horrible studies that support their position. I'll refer to, as a perfect example, Intelligence studies. Lots of social studies which attempt to explain the achievement/IQ gap between blacks and whites through social injustices. These studies are RIFE with terrible methodologies, wrong conclusions which don't match the data, etc. etc. but the leftist is only focused on trying to attack your own data sources.

If they were honest people, they would look at a subject without bias, look at the data from BOTH sides, then reach the conclusion (which is of course, that the idea that the difference is largely down to genes, is the position with the much stronger evidence).

Though frankly you shouldn't even need the evidence. Just using your eyes and experiences should provide enough to simply infer using basic pattern recognition.
>>
>>535089650
It's true. TDS is Trump Devotion Syndrome, not to be confused with Tranny Derangement Syndrome and Trump Dick-sucking Syndrome. Although they often overlap.
>>
>>535089417
They also massively count on genetic fallacy, because truly neutral sources are rare, leftist sources won't admit to conclusions they don't like, and they'll just dismiss "right-wing" sources. And when it comes to something with heavy desire to prove a belief on both sides like the religion of evolutionism, obviously most "sources" you will find are Christians, but they're just the retellers presenting their own view of the facts, not the source of the data and facts presented. Evolutionists will systematically refuse to hear anything said from such a source, dismissing everything despite the fact every single point of data is fully recognized by academics. Leftists being irrational dishonest "people", they pretend the only reason you could come up with a different conclusion to them is that you were secretly "biased" this entire time as if that meant anything. If someone attacked me, of course I'd be biased in wanting to expose them, that doesn't make my camera recording everything in crisp details irrelevant.
>>
>>535086961
>unironic creationist

You're dumb.
>>
>>535081184
Because when you say shit like Hillary Clinton was in a child snuff video they expect you to back it up with something instead of having a schizo meltdown and accusing them of being a Jew.
>>
>>535082440
> Like they can't even accept that importing primarely poor, uneducated men from deeply sexist and homophobic cultures will increase crime and be especially bad for women and fags.
It's nonsense argument. If it's bad then you should be deported. Are you advocating for your own deportment? No? Then you are being a hypocrite and importing Muslims or whatever won't actually change anything.

They need a source because otherwise you are basically advocating "I should be kicked out of this country but foreigners are still worse". Which raises the question of why we don't simply deport you and then bring in migrants that are better than you.
>>
>>535087321
It's because they think they're doing it "for the greater good".

It's like "if people found out about this, everyone would be racist and then blacks would all be genocided". So they think that covering it up and lying about it then it's better.

But then this just creates more anger and conflict because people begin to realize they're being lied to and treated unjustly. If we simply depoliticized certain issues, like racism, we would have a more harmonious society. People could just accept, yeah, blacks are a little dumber, but still deserve to be treated like people, instead of feeding them a narrative that they're oppressed kangs.
>>
Half this board is just twitter screenshots and image macros at this point. If any board could use some more sources it's this one.
>>
>>535086195
Says teh right winger whose ideologies have never worked in the real world.
>>
File: lucy bones vs artist.jpg (19 KB, 385x373)
19 KB JPG
>>535089832
The bible is fake and gay, evolutionism is 10 times more fake and gay. If you believe in a religion where every conclusion was reached using picrel's non-sequitur methodology, you are the total opposite of a scientist. Anyone believing in evolutionism is not a scientist.
>>
>>535089750
>Though frankly you shouldn't even need the evidence. Just using your eyes and experiences should provide enough to simply infer using basic pattern recognition.
I accept that.

So, kill all right wingers. No trial, no nothing. Two world wars was enough. Feelings over facts.
>>
>>535089953
Right wingers, especially the cornered animals that live on this board, hate truth. They hate facts. They hate the scientific method. And they hate you for being human.

Threads like this proof that any actual communication that can be had is putting a bullet in their misinformed inhuman brains.
>>
>>535089750
>Something I definitely noticed arguing with leftists is that they will attempt to nitpick every tiny little thing about any source you provide
Something I've noticed about debating miggers is that you can provide them with the best sources around, including sources directly from Trump's government, and they still call it "fake news" and cite posts from Facebook or Truth Social.
>>
>>535089793
Lmao nigger it’s leftists who are the most ardent evolution deniers. Obviously they’re a bit more subtle than the Christians who say overtly ridiculous shit like “god made all the animals in a day” but it’s just as unscientific to say “there’s only one race, the human race, blah blah.”
>>
>>535087153
>Actually telling people where I got my information makes my argument weaker
The jewry is strong

>>535087237
Normative claims dont require proof. So yeah, no source can be accredited in the first place.
>>
Because you guys have an absurd tendency to believe things that "feel" right but later turn out to be wrong.
>>
>>535081184
Because libfaggs have no logical arguments
>>
>>535090300
I blame evangelicalism and it's emphasis on feeling over intellect.
>>
>>535081184
because your anecdotal bullshit only matters to you.
>>
>>535090179
This
>>
Why do rightoids hate truth and facts?
>>
>>535090231
Race is anti scientific, anon. It's been totally discredited and shown to have no genetic basic.
>>
>>535090512
Because they hate humanity.
>>
>>535090461
>t. needs to have his meme marching orders neatly packaged by ((experts)) for him

Kek this is why you’re literally going to remain a poor waging employee your entire life
>>
>>535081855
You just proved his point lmao fucking idiot
>>
File: 1735592651763300.webm (1.98 MB, 854x478)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB WEBM
>>535087995
Nice strawman, faggot.
>>
>>535090519
Marxism is anti scientific, anon. It's been totally discredited and shown to have no economic basic.
>>
>>535081184
They have been successfully brainwashed by the jew.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3eMWLG7Rro
>>
>>535090300
Such as? Every right wing position is true. And I’m not talking about fake right wing or surface level BS like christcuckery, which is literally just normie brainwashing to get them to behave in a civilized manner. I mean actual right wing philosophical axioms, like inequality being fundamental, nature > nurture, civilization being downstream from patriarchy and philia, etc.
>>
>>535081184
Leftists are collectivists. Collectivism requires that all thoughts and ideas get filtered through the collective. Independent thought is antithetical to collectivism. It's not without its benefits though.
>>
File: me shitta.png (1.26 MB, 884x1516)
1.26 MB PNG
>>535081588
me shitta is my source
>>
>>535089650
>Trump was brought up out of nowhere
>TDS doesn't mean that anymore! It means what I want it to mean!
Lol. And then you engage in accusations of "cult of personality", and while I don't disagree, saying it's the largest ever and will never be beaten is absurd.

Typical leftist bullshit. Cant meme, try and redefine words and terms, and over exaggerate everything. Yawn. Just more commie pinko noise.
>>
>>535081184
So they can attack your sources because 99 times out of 100 they don't have a good argument and are low information lemmings who know 'fox news bad'
>>
>>535091191
That photo was taken in Ireland, gtfo jeets.
>>
We're just a lot more educated and know that opinions without research and sourcing are useless.
>>
>>535091341
>That photo was taken in Ireland, gtfo jeets.
me shitta is as Irish as you
https://ie.linkedin.com/in/mishita-kesarwani-b9141394
>>
>>535081299
This, and 90% of the time their viewpoint is so skewed/idiotic that there is no source that has bothered wasting time to point out how retarded it is.
>>
>>535091237
Buzzwords buzzwords buzzwords
>>
>>535081184
Because they are utter imbeciles unable to think for themselves, so the only form of debate they know is to parrot stuff backed by authority figures.
Common sense, heuristics, inference are alien concept to them. Finally, for the top percentile among them barely reaching a 3 digit IQ, they know they are lying, and using the idiotic
>muh sources on the sky being blue
angle to stall when they are losing internet argments, a favorite of them along the "pretending not to understand" trick
They are so goddamn stupid they honestly think we don't see through their childish tactics. They are such shameless, massive cocksuckers lmao
>>
>>535081184
>The left LOVES sources so you should HATE it
>>
>>535081184
"What? Left wingers don't just blindly believe stuff they read on the internet?"

This is why I do not care if jews and the elite enslave us. The majority of people are so fucking stupid that enslavement is the default choice, considering the only other option is total annihilation.

The gap in intelligence between humans is not talked about nearly enough. Most of you are dogs compared to people like myself - your critical thinking ability is essentially non-existent. You're essentially mindless, soulless drones walking through life on autopilot. You are undeserving of freedom
>>
>>535090897
This isn’t true at all. Leftists in reality are individualists. The only thing they disagree on with each other is whether individuals should be free to do whatever they feel like (anarchism/liberalism) or whether individuals should be forced into a state of egalitarian equality so that individuals can be even more atomized. All leftists are opposed to organically formed, robust collectives arrived at through the natural processes that actually produce civilized societies.
>>
>>535081294
What is truth?
>>
>>535081399
Like “diversity is our strength?”
>>
>>535090641
How you retarded faggot? Everything he said was correct.
>>
File: IMG_7638.jpg (50 KB, 749x655)
50 KB JPG
>>535089832
Imagine thinking that a world which revolves around the minds and decisions of human men (because women believe literally whatever is presented infront of them most often), where every aspect of nature can be redesigned and adjusted by the thinking and actions of men is somehow not a universe built by a man that looks like one of us.

Why would the world be a random thing when video games and virtual reality isn’t?
>>
>>535081184
Why are rightoids always making shit up and repeating propaganda fed to them by their billionaire masters?
>>
>>535091237
>Muh leftists



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.