LONDON CANT GET WRESTLEMANIA DADDY!!!
That's the wrong khan trips
>>14410603>AEW pays to run Wembley>WWE gets paid to run Wembley
>London is already the sporting capital of the worldKneel.
>We'll look to bring WrestleMania, Superbowl and the NBA to London, and put together another bid for the 2040 Olympics.what the fuck? does this pajeet fucking retard really think the NFL is gonna hold the fucking superbowl in london?
>>14410603Time to play the game, baby!
>>14410617>London is already the sporting capital of the worldmaybe if BBC posting is a sport
>>14410620The NFL is trying to expand outside north america bro.
>>14410603Big Poop!
>>14410603dont do it hhh its the pedo capital of the world its not safe!
>>14410670Why are white english people such pedos, bros?
>WrestleMania at Wembley obliterates AEW's made up record and Tony necks himselfbased?
>>14410670>>14410684>London>white>English
>HOW CAN I MAKE THIS ABOUT AEW
>>14410620Don't worry about migrant gangs wielding knives on the street, don't worry about Manhattan level rents and housing, just enjoy the bread and circus
>>14410698why did you think of aew when you read the "DADDY NOOOO" message
>>14410714fuck off retard
>>14410722
>>14410670>the pedo capital of the worldThat's Birmingham in the UK or Israel in general.
>>14410630British Broadcasting Corporation is a not sport, silly
>>14410684>(((white english people)))
>>14410684White people? In London? Not even on planet retard
>>14410614nice headcanon, the Khans aren't paying WWE shit.
>>14410684>white
>>14410603>go even further
>>14410603Wasn't the a rumor that London was trying to get the Jags? This new move towards American spots could make the Khans much richer
>>14410635The Superbowl always has to start late in the afternoon in America to draw the most viewers, what time would that be in europoor bongland, like 1 AM?
>>14410603>As far as we will go but even further
>>14410762Based retard
>>14410614There is absolutely zero chance in hell the city of London are paying site fees for WWE. WrestleMania at Wembley? Sure it could happen, but the government aren't paying for it.
>>14410684snow roaches love pedophilia.
>>14410722Kek you mad
>>14412265>Sure it could happen, but the government aren't paying for it.Every city pays to cover the cost of hosting the event which effects logisitics like transit, traffic, and police placement. The "city" doesn't pay for it. It comes out of taxes collected before and during the event from the influx of sales and commerce the event creates, something the event holders bring data on. So the city makes money in the end. Stop console warring over things you literally dont understand. Every city bids on events because every city makes money on the events. Bigger event, bigger profit.
>>14410603Gotta love the cerebral assassin, baby
>>14410630I've seen a few BBC athletes posting on the board today. They have been lusting and posting for BBC all morning like it's their job (it probably is)
>>14412361Yeah my point is London are not paying WWE's site fees. There's no way in hell. They don't need to, they're one of the biggest cities in the world, far bigger than WWE. Same reason New York aren't paying site fees, or Paris, or Tokyo. If WWE wants to host WrestleMania in London then London have the leverage.
>>14412509you're retarded and you know literally nothing. you think that the mayor of London is going to pitch hosting mania in London by saying "we're London, so you should be honored"? WWE will just take the money from fuckin San Diego or something instead.
>>14410603Cant wait for the first ppv in Indiar SAr HHH, tank you for redeeming.
>>14412509Wrestlemania is a weeklong event unlike most events and it actually keeps people invested the entire week unlike AEW with All In.
>>14412660>you think that the mayor of London is going to pitch hosting mania in London by saying "we're London, so you should be honoredYes, that's exactly what will happen. Do you have any idea the stupid amounts of money that go through London on an annual basis, a financial hub of the world?If WWE go to San Diego because Sadiq Kahn won't pay site fees then the city loses nothing. There's infinite big events that want to go there. The only people who lose in that situation are WWE.
Bongbros, what the fuck is it like walking around in London in 2024?It seems so dystopic. Has it changed greatly in the past 20 years?
>>14412509the London dude is begging WWE and will pay WWE money to be there just like the aussies did.
>>14412684>There's infinite big events that want to go thereThey had ALL In lmao and he doesn't give a single shit about it the fact he is begging WWE is very telling
>>14410603You already have Dubai and Mumbai, fuck off.
>>14412674who mentioned All In? I'm talking about site fees. London has absolutely no need to bow to WWE's demands in a situation like that, They could get pretty much any big sporting event they want and not pay a penny in site fees.I don't think you realise how powerful of a city they are and how little WWE means to them in the grand scheme of things. They hosted the Olympic Games in 2012 and very well could host the World Cup in the near future, probably the two biggest sporting events that exist.
>>14412690He's begging no one. He's making a pitch but you think that pitch involves him paying millions to WWE for the honour of WrestleMania then you're utterly delusional and need to leave the wrestling bubble.
>>14412509What leverage?Cities fight each other tooth and nail for the right to pay WWE to host events like Wrestlemania because that event alone brings hundreds of millions of dollars to the local economy. Helping to land Wrestlemania is literally something that a person can get re-elected on.
Pigvert is losing his mind in this thread
>>14412684you're shoot retarded and 100% wrong, but if that was the case, London will never get WrestleMania because why would WWE put their marquee event in a fucktarded time zone for no money? If London wants to host a WrestleMania, they have to bid on the opportunity to generate the incremental revenue increase that comes from it.
>>14412702He's begging no one. Can you not tell the difference between begging and making a pitch? big events don't begin and end with WWE. Seriously, watch something else, anything else outside of Raw and SmackDown.
>>14412746>>14412732Go to bed, Tony
>>14412722>They could get pretty much any big sporting event they want and not pay a penny in site fees.how much did the 2012 Olympics cost taxpayers?
>>14410603london jags arent letting them use wembley
>>14412686It depends which part you're in. Coincidentally I was in Wembley (North West London) yesterday and it was a nice place honestly. Looked good, clean, solid people around.South and East London are the shit spots
>every other big city bids for wwe to host big shows in their city because of the massive amount of revenue a wwe show produces>but London won’t because…..w-well it just won’t okay! London is bigger than San Francisco!!!!The lunacy of aew troons just never ceases to amaze me. An endless treasure trove of laughs.
>NOTICE ME, MAYOR STREETSHITTERPathetic display from Triple Caged.
>>14412743>>14412737The leverage, and the reason London won't pay site fees is that they don't need to. Like I said in a previous post, there's a very good chance they get the World Cip in the next decade and the World Cup makes WrestleMania look utterly insignificant by comparison. The World Cup also won't charge site fees.
>>14412756A lot less than in brought in, and it still didn't cost the city a penny in site fees like WrestleMania would.
>>14412775>still didn't cost the city a penny in site fees like WrestleMania would.they literally built stadiums for it you fuckin tard
>>14410603>but ever further
>>14412762You know nothing. Why isn't Backlash being held in Paris instead of Lyon? Why wasn't Elimination Chamber in Sydney instead of Perth,. Because those cities had no interest in paying site fees because they don't need to.
>>14412765He's not talking to Tony Khan
>>14412801Because they got outbid, I’m afraid. That’s how a real promotion works, lil buddy
>>14412775https://www.skysports.com/olympics/news/15233/7454498/the-true-costsyou're fuckin dumb.
>>14412789That's not what site fees are. You don't know what you're talking about do you?
>>14412814are the site fees for mania more or less than 12 billion euro?
>>14412810Utter delusion. You honestly think the world revolves around WWE. You are beyond help if you seriously believe this.
>>14412686every day all the commuters living outside london come into the city centre for work so the capital goes from "minority white" to "90%+ white british"
>>14412813What does that have to do with WrestleMania site fees?
>>14412766They need to beg, like everyone else. Sorry Londonoid, go eat a lamb/girl kebab while you cope.
>>14412824This is honestly the dumbest most in the bubble take I've ever heard. Absolutely pathetic. Can you not understand the difference between a one time fee that goes straight into WWE's pocket and an investment in stadiums which can be used after the fact to bring more money into the country? I know you desperately want WrestleMania in London and I'm not saying it won't happen but you genuinely need to learn about how the world works outside of pro wrestling and 4chan if you think it's going to happen with Sadiq Kahn writing Tripe H a cheque for the honour.
>>14412835why did London bid on the Olympics at all? why did London have to? don't they know London doesn't need the Olympics and the Olympics should be honored to be hosted there?
>>14412825Ah so you don’t have an actual argument? Interesting.
>>14412870They bid to get the Olympics there. The difference is they didn't have to pay the Olympics for the honour. How can you not understand this yet?
THE LONDON CONTRACT DOES SAY KHAN... BUT..
>>14412874Again, comparing Cardiff to London is ludicrous. London could have an event just as big if not bigger than WrestleMania which will bring in just as much reven8ue which wont require them to spend a penny in site fees. Cardiff are not big enough of a city to command that.
>>14412864London will most definitely bend the knee and write a FAT check if they want the right to host Wrestlemania because that's how it works. Do you think WWE would host a show in some third world hellhole if they weren't being paid for it?Do you think they'll look at the extremely financially lucrative proposals from American cities with 70,000 seat stadiums, and say "nah, fuck off, we're going to spend millions and millions extra to host in England at a time that is so inconvenient that nobody but euros will watch it live"You are truly the emperor of planet retard
>>14412904Yeah blud London is the biggest and bestest city ever lmfao
>>14412885>The difference is they didn't have to pay the Olympics for the honourLMAO yeah the IOC never takes bribes from bidders. also picrel doesn't look good....
>>14412906>>14412911Okay you've both proven here you know jack shit if you think London isn't one of the world major hubs and that they're so desperate for WrestleMania they'll pay for it. I implore you to learn something about the real world outside of what's going on with Cody Rhodes.
>>14412906>Do you think WWE would host a show in some third world hellholeThey just did Philly
>>14412934Yeah London is definitely bigger than Hollywood on planet retard lmfao
>>14412912Yeah that's still not site fees of London paying the Olympic board. I genuinely can't see how you don't understand this. It's ignorance on another level. Where are you from?
>>14412943London, along with New York and Tokyo is one of the three financial hubs of the world. Again please learn something about how the world works before you come back with another diabolically bad take.
>>14412969New York? Didn’t they pay a large amount for the wwe house show there in December that did over 16k people?
>>14410694>>14410745>>14410759>>14410775kek mad whiteroach?
>>14410614Once again AEW is the pissant secondary company that no one gives a fuck about, while the world pleads with WWE to bring the big leagues to their cities.BOW DOWN TO THE!BOW DOWN TO THE KING!
>>14413019BASED
>>14412684>London>financial hubStill living in 2017? Majority of London's financial business moved to Amsterdam and Frankfurt. London's old news, shot dead by Brexit.
>>14412991No. Site fees are only charged for PLE's. Not weekly TV or house shows. You're exposing just how little you know here.
>>14413033You truly don't understand what's going on in the world if you believe this. You live in a bubble.
>>14410603>TO GO EVEN FURTHERIs this Paki trolling WWE?
>>14412934Yeah sure, London may have the prestige of being the Glasgow of southern Britain or whatever but that doesn't mean they get to skip the line. They have to pay to play just like everyone. Hell, Cairo is also a "global capital" but, just like London, it's a third-world hellhole that would have to pay out the ass to get considered. I'll make it simple enough that a new transplant to London, like yourself, could even understand it.>Option A: Los Angeles, CA, offering millions and millions in incentives and a relatively short domestic flight and easy highway access to move gear.>Option B: Washington, DC, offering millions and millions in incentives, a 20 minute flight out of NYC, and easy highway access to move gear.>Option C: London, EN, offering nothing for compensation or incentives because of The Allure of The Teenagers Turned Into Kebabs, an 8 hour flight from the Atlanta hub, millions and millions in extra costs to transport gear, an inconvenient broadcast time, and such repressive laws that they would need loicenses for everything from the eggs and flour used in catering to the spoons used for lunch
>>14413062The absolute irony of this statement.Sorry buddy, London just ain't a big deal anymore. Sorry to burst your bubble.
>>14412953>Br*tish taxpayers pay $18 billion>IOC takes all of the profitsuhhhhhh
>>14413112Again, you know absolutely nothing about how the world works. It's mind boggling how you cant see this and how you cant understand why London is more powerful that both Washington and LA for reasons that have been explained again and again in this thread. You literally just don't want to see facts because it doesn't fit your narrative. It's like the behaviour of a petulant child or a highly autistic adult/
>>14413062OHNONONO this delusional little immigrant doesn't understand London has lost its luster because him and his 19 cousins have moved in and stunk up the place.
>>14413146>London is more powerful that both Washington and LALOLLIL BLUD STILL THINKS HIS COUNTRY HAS AN EMPIRE
>>14412265Sorry for pull you out from your safe space, tranny, but that's count only for aew.Other business are there for profits
>>14413136Again, stadiums built as investments negate much of those costs in the long run and IOC taking a percentage of profits is not site fees. It's getting embarrassing how little you actually know here yet you keep trying to act lie you do. It's full dunning kruger effect.>>14413127You just like an infant sticking his fingers in his ears at this point/
>>14413146Damn, imagine how gutted this guy is going to feel when he realises how irrelevant his city actually is. That's gonna be a painful moment of culture shock.
>>14413147The pakis are very sensitive over how damaging they are to a country. In their little heads they think they're welcomed but in reality the British would mass deport them if they could.
>>14413161Who's talking about an empire? Please learn even a little about this before you keep embarrassing yourself with mindless takes. London has been one of the most powerful cities in the world for centuries and it remains so today, empire or not. You wanting them to pay for WrestleMania is not going to change that no matter how much you delude yourself it wiill
ITT: WWE fans pretending they understand world economicsEmbarrassing, someone screencap this thread for future reference.
>>14413226if they do land wrestlemania at london, you'll rope yourself. that I know.
>>14413146Okay, so explain how this power and prestige convinces WWE to spend millions and millions having to move production to London, essentially breaking even, instead of them staying home and making a ridiculous fortune.
>>14413178>Again, stadiums built as investments negate much of those costs in the long rungot any data to back that up?
>>14413226Explain, in the terms of your extensive knowledge of global finance, world economics, and sporting event profitability, what would make WWE choose London over a domestic city offering a $200M weekend if they stayed home.Your brain is so huge this will be so easy for you.
>>14413226Zoomers don't screencap threads anymoreThey don't even archive themBoard culture is dead
>>14413243So they can say they ran Wembley. again? That's WWE's issue to deal with not London, just like it wasn't Paris or Sydney's
>>14413210>You wanting them to pay for WrestleMania is not going to change that no matter how much you delude yourself it wiillif they want WrestleMania, they'll pay for it. that's a 100% certainty.
>>14413288Whether WWE do it or not is they decision to make, not London's. There's more prestige to running London compared to say Cardiff but thats a decision for Paul Levesque and Nick Kahn to make. They didn't run Paris or Sydney either it hasn't hurt those cities at all. WWE are not the all powerful entity you think they are on the global stage. I know it's easy to think that when it's literally all you consume.>>14413274The millions they bring in on an annual basis in ticket sales. The community efforts the teams who use those stadiums engage in. I'm not a content aggregator for you yu can look it up yourself/
>>14413303They're not going to get WrestleMania then because they're not going to pay for it. WWE means very little in the grand scheme of things.
>Tiny Klown ITT desperately trying to persuade phantom WWE employees that they shouldn't run Wembley and destroy Gay In's manufactured "record"
>>14413362>The millions they bring in on an annual basis in ticket sales. The community efforts the teams who use those stadiums engage in. I'm not a content aggregator for you yu can look it up yourself/so just your headcanon, then? you said it, ya fuckin faggot. when will those stadiums pay back their initial investments?
>>14413385How is that headcanon? You're just throwing out buzzwords at this point because the only thing that will give your life meaning is for WWE to get an epic win by getting WrestleMania
>>14413407it's headcanon because you're just making shit up. when will taxpayers get back their $12billion?
>>14413362So you don't know anything about anything and you entire argument boils down to "well, wwe has never run paris or sydney". I understand where you are coming from fully Raj.>>14413301The prestige of losing millions of dollars on an event they could run domestically and make nine figures on? I know you guys are clinically renowned, like actual published papers discussing the phenomenon, for being really dumb but also grossly overconfident in the extent of your knowledge, maybe you can rethink it and rewrite it.
>>14413422presumably through the various community work most football teams who run these stadiums do, or by the fans they bring in from around europe for big european games which are often held at these stadiums. maybe the large gigs that are often held at them. there are countless ways this could happen but again i'm not a content aggregator for you.
>>14413458>presumablyaka headcanon. you're the one who said they were a good investment, anon. are you just going to speculate or do you have actual data?
>>14413438You keep ignoring the key fact here which is that London don't need WrestleMania. They have large events lined up for years. They're not going to lose anything by not hosting WrestleMania. If it was somewhere like Glasgow or Manchester it would be a completely different story as they are cities which much less power and money. It's really not that hard to understand but you're deliberately ignoring facts that don't suit your narrative
>>14413473Thats not head canon. thats examples of a number of different ways that money can be recouped. You don't know what the words you're saying mean
>>14413488>They're not going to lose anything by not hosting WrestleManiathey're going to lose the incremental revenue that comes with hosting WrestleMania. it's why cities bid on hosting WrestleMania or any other large events that bring people to the city to spend money.
>>14413511And that money will be made up by whatever other major event they hold instead which doesn't charge site fees.
>>14413503>soccer teams have paid back $12 billion via "community work"faggot are you shoot retarded
>>14413488Wrestlemania brings hundreds of millions of dollars to the local economy of every city that hosts it. London needs that. They have a huge dependant population to take care of. Local business most definitely needs it. I don't know if you have a grasp on the actual scope of the whole thing.
>>14413529Thats one example of several. I see by your use of the term soccer you're American which explains why you think you're an expert in the uk and how they operate. Typical utter braindead take.
>>14413528>And that money will be made up by whatever other major event they hold instead which doesn't charge site fees.if "whatever other event" generated as much revenue for a city as WrestleMania does, they would be charging to host it too. are you this naive?
>>14413545how much soccer team community work adds up to $12billion?
>>14413533the money WrestleMania would bring in can be brought in by any number of other events which don't charge site fees. I don't know why you keep ignoring this fact when it's been stated at east half a dozen times.
>>14413558>the money WrestleMania would bring in can be brought in by any number of other events which don't charge site feesif they brought in as much money as WrestleMania does, they absolutely charge site fees.
>>14413546no they wouldn't. That's the point. WWE are one of the few places who think they can get away with that in places as big as London. You've just proven you don't even understand the basic crux of the argument.>>14413557What part of one example of several didn't you understand?
>>14413571see this >>14413573The fact you think that if WWE does it everyone else must too proves how much of a bubble you live in.
>>14413573>What part of one example of several didn't you understand?so the city of London subsidized stadiums for privately owned soccer teams to use because the soccer games generate ancillary revenue to recoup the investment of building the stadium? hmmm......
>>14413558Nobody is ignoring it, it's just dumb. It is complete nonsense. What events, held in late March or early April could London possibly host that would being hundreds of millions of dollars in outside money to the city and local business? Please be as vague, dodgy, and mewling as you possibly can be.
>>14413573>WWE are one of the few places who think they can get away with thatthey don't think they can get away with accepting bids to host WrestleMania, they are 100% correct that cities will bid to host WrestleMania. are you retarded?
>>14413602Go back and read some of the examples i provided. How do these relate to your statement? We've no reached the point you're trying to use big words to sound like you have even an idea what you're saying.The irony is at no point did i say WrestleMania wouldn't happen in London, just that WWE would have to accept they're not getting site fees for giving the city the honour. You're too locked in blind love for a major corporation to see that though.
>>14413639if London wants to have WrestleMania, they will absolutely have to bid on it. WrestleMania has a proven track record - people will travel to attend it. They don't need it to be in a city like London, particularly considering that the time zone is retarded for the (more important) American audience. If London doesn't want to bid on hosting, then they won't host because somewhere else will. Simple as.
>>14413612The world is filled with major sporting events, most of them in Europe involve football. On top of that there's also massive gigs that can be held on multiple nights, This year alone Taylor Swift, ACDC, and Bruce Springsteen are playing Wembley over the course of a month, some of them multiple nights. That alone will draw more money for the city than WrestleMania.You literally can't see beyond WWE. You think the world begins and ends with them.
>>14413627Not cities as big as London. We're going round in circles because you refuse to accept that simple fact despite all the reasons given>>14413668If London doesn't want to bid on hosting, then they won't host because somewhere else will. Simple asMore than likely this will happen because WWE have no power in the situation. Again, for the tenth time, London don't need WWE no matter how important you think they are.
>>14413689>Taylor Swift, ACDC, and Bruce Springsteenfaggot that happens in every major North American city too, including Philadelphia which just hosted mania. WrestleMania is incremental revenue, dumbfuck.
>>14412509>Yeah my point is London are not paying WWE's site fees.Why? Because you think WWE events don't have a financial impact that is on par with an NFL event which they do pay for? It does. Again just because YOU don't like WWE doesnt mean that in the business world these cities look at them as great ways to encourage and boost commerce. Especially for new elected officials. It shows a city is safe and reliable. >They don't need toNY and LA also do this. Just stop console warring about everything WWE. It makes money. You can not like it AND it can make money.
>>14413714>Not cities as big as London.nobody gives a fuck about London, dipshit. it's in a dumb time zone and bongs will pay to travel to whatever American city hosts WrestleMania anyways. fuckin Miami, Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco, Boston and DC are all more important cities to Americans than London is.
>>14413689So again, what event that would be held in late March or early April, would bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in outside money to London? I appreciate the dishonest attempt to equate a locally-marketed concert to an event like Wrestlemania which brings people from all around the globe to spend literally hundreds of millions of dollars in local businesses during the week long festivities?
>>14413717And if they happened within a month of each other they'd draw more than WrestleMania no matter what city it was. I see the problem here. You think that because you only watch WWE they're some kind of world superpower when it truth they're not even anywhere near on the same level of other bigger sports.>>14413722I don't now how many time i can explain the reasons why London doesn't need WWE. For the last time, and you can go back and read the thread for the countless examples i've given for this, they have numerous events they could run which would draw just as much as WrestleMania and which wouldn't demand site fees be charged. WWE is not the world even if you think it is.
>>14410603There's a good chance they'd get suicide bombed if they did have a show in London
>>14413774>And if they happened within a month of each other they'd draw more than WrestleMania no matter what city it waswtf are you talking about? LA gets way more events and concerts than London does, and they thought it was prudent to bid on WrestleMania. London isn't that special.
>>14413774>I don't now how many time i can explain the reasons why London doesn't need WWE.Don't worry Raj, you haven't actually explained once why London wouldn't pay to play like everyone has to.
>>14413753You've exposed how little you know.>>14413762Gigs that size can be held at any time of year which will fill the fucking stadium. Football events can be held there at any time of year which will fill the fucking stadium. This is not the gotcha comment you think it is. Why is it so hard for you to accept this? Why are you so obsessed with the idea that WWE is bigger than the city of London? Does it mean that much to you? Are you that obsessed with WWE?
>>14413799>You've exposed how little you know.but enough about you. why are you so triggered by the fact that the mayor of London is going to use taxpayer money to bid on WrestleMania when aew has to pay for Wembley?
>>14413795Then you clearly can't read.>>14413791I'd like you to do me a favour. I'd like you to screencap this thread and if and when the day comes when London host WrestleMania sans site fees then i want you to read it back. You might have a moment of self awareness.
>>14413824Okay. You're just a console war guy. It all makes sense now.
>>14410603Nice of Tony and Nick's brother to helo haitch out.
>>14413826if London won't incentivize WWE to host WrestleMania there (in a bad time zone) then there won't be a WrestleMania there. The mayor of London declaring that he wants to explore hosting WrestleMania means that he is interested in incentivizing WWE to do so. I'm sorry this triggers you so much.
>>14410603>Sadiq Khan>Shad Khan>Tony Khan>Nick KhanWhat's the story here
>>14413858No it doesn't. There's nothing about his tweet which indicates that. You're just seeing what you want to see. All it indicates is that he would like WrestleMania in the country, not that he's willing to pay for it.
>>14413859brownies who got raped by Genghis trying really hard to be like The Great Khan so they stole his title and use it as a last name
>>14413886so the mayor of London is completely oblivious to the process of attracting large, annual events to his city? I doubt it.
>>14413907What other large annual events are charging site fees to go to London? What part of his tweet suggests he's willing to pay? You keep saying the same thing over and over again hoping it will eventually come true, it's the definition of madness
>>14413858Correct. Anyone claiming otherwise is coping hard.
>>14413926>What part of his tweet suggests he's willing to pay?the part where he knows that cities bid on hosting WrestleMania and he expressed interest in London hosting WrestleMania. try to keep up.
>>14413960That doesn't mean he's willing to pay. All he said is he wanted WrestleMania in London. The mayor of London knows he doesn't have to pay. He knows he holds power at the negotiating table. so what about the comment tells you he's ready to pay up? Give me something other than the same statement rewords for the fifteenth time
>>14410614baaaseeed
>>14413799>Does it mean that much to you?You argue like a woman. "Sure I don't actually have a valid argument, but why do you care so much?"Again, please list off a few of these events which attract thousands and thousands of people from overseas and entices them to pump hundreds of millions of dollars into the local economy over the span of five days or so?
>>14410981It will not happen. Sponsors will not allow it.
>>14413826>Then you clearly can't read.You didn't say anything. Your entire argument is The Allure of London, as if they wouldn't have to pay for the privilege like everyone else. If New York City, Los Angeles, Philadelphia all have to pay why wouldn't London have to pay? Let's indulge your fantasy for a second;>WWE, with zero financial incentive, says fuck you to every other paying customer and spends millions and millions of dollars to run London. >The show has to be aired at 11am EST/8am PST in the part of the world that matters to have a 4pm local bell time. Such Allure.
>>14410603No Wembley? KWAPC
>>14414001>Wheels is doing his "stubbornly denying objective reality because it really upsets him" shtick again
Hey rovert, what business school did you go to again?
>>14410635That's never gonna work. No one outside burguerland watches that shit sport and in countries like England where they absolutely hate the word "soccer" the hatred for handegg is even worse.
>>14410613He lost the chance to write I’ll have my Khan talk to your Khan or something
>>14412361This is such a bullshit cope. >erm actually the city does pay for itYou know what OP ment you fuck
>>14414162Euros, like everyone else from The Rest Of The World, desperately want to be American. The funny thing is soccer is the original name and football was adopted afterward.
>>14413243Wwe is asking for a fucking handout you dumbass. They will get paid upfront some fucking legal bribe to bring their carnival to London with taxpayer money like a more retarded Saudi Arabia
>>14413438They wouldn’t lose millions you tard. hhH is begging khan for a handout like the billionaire team owners that get taxpayer rubes to pay for their stadiums
>>14414317The cities have to pay to play, and The Allure of London alone doesn't justify the expense of having to move the entire operation overseas. Do you think from a logistical standpoint they'd just do it to be in London? The London of today isn't the London of 20 years ago. There is NO allure attached to London anymore.>>14414337They would lose millions. They would lose every dollar offered by any other potential winning city. They would lose every dollar they spent transporting all of their equipment overseas. They keep a bare minimum there already, ring, barricades, etc but what about the rest of it?Come on man, you have to think about things before you write them.
>>14414001>He knows he holds power at the negotiating tablewhat power? If he doesn't want to pay, someone else will. London holds no advantage in bidding on WrestleMania.
>>14414266>soccer is the original name and football was adopted afterwardNope.As football became more and more popular, the upper classes who had turned up their noses at it tried to seize control (because naturally the peasants cannot be allowed to have anything of their own), which involved rebranding it as soccer. Americans keep using this name because they're cuckolds to their ruling elites.
>>14410603I’m hyped. London deserves its first major wrestling event
>>14414539nah it's called soccer over here because it's easier to identify it as the sport for women and small children as opposed to football, which is a man's sport
>>14414539yepIt was called assoccer to distinguish it from rugger, and shortened to soccer. english people and irish people call it football but literally everywhere else in the world it's soccer
