>None of the usual grifters posted the fast nationals for Smackdown this weekendOh we gigaplummeting again aren't we
>>1582802130 minute commercial free and a 10 minute overrun and no fast nationals? Holy fuck how bad were the ratings
>>15828021Grimmy grim grim
>>15828021tick tock smacksows
>>15828076>WWE literally can't even bribe people to watch
>>15828021Fraud sau
>>15828021Wait, wait... now Fast Nationals are "le good"? I can't keep up with you aewfags.
>>15828021I'm thinking 1.3 if their lucky. Romanfags? How the fuck do we cope finding out we were never a draw?
>>15828021Starting the show with a Cody match made people just straight up tune out right away
>>15828021Seems to be the case
The first show after a network switch never does well, the smooth brain demo doesn’t get the memo they have to switch channels. It’ll get Raw numbers next week.
just checked the newsletter4.6 millyhttps://www.f4wonline.com/the-latest/smackdown-brings-in-5-million-viewers-in-the-ratings/
>>15828021Anything over 750k still means it beats anything AEW does.
>>15828021Many are saying this
>>15828021>>15828076>>15828709>>15828757>>15829902>>15830727>>15830808>>15831500>>15831626>pigwheels is already seething to death because he knows Smackdown raped AEW yet again>not even switching networks could stop the rape>Smackdown will just continue to rape AEW, foreverSome might call that grim.
>>15831646The raping of Tony Khan continues
When the fuck does the smackdown fast nationals gets posted? I have never seen that.
>>15828021jeeeeesus
>>15831646THIS IS WRESTLINGCLAP CLAP CLAP CLAPCLAP
>>15828021this ALWAYS backfires on you aewtists
>>15828021seems to be the trend, I’ll never understand it, a big company like the E struggling like this
>>15830732They can be but they can also not be. Try and keep up. Fast nationals are exactly what they sound like, a quick early rating before other factors and numbers are averaged in. If the number looks bad at face value and the coming numbers are going to help it look better then it can be advantageous to release the early number to make a show's rating look worse than it actually ends up being. In other words what WWE has done when they've sent out AEW's numbers. If the initial number looks great and the added metrics only might bring it down then it makes sense to release that number yourself. Which WWE has done before and is what's being questioned here. Because the alternative is the initial number not being great and anything additional doing nothing to help it which is what's being suspectedI personally have no idea what the number is gonna be. They got a 1.7 for their last Fox show. Raw has pulled 2s before. So who knows. They tried to stack the card so maybe it did well. Those are just the different scenarios on how fast nationals can be used to try and shift a narrative though
>>15833593true true
that dumb fucking ….n….n….nah thats FUCKJNG IT. im saying it. that NIGGER alfred konauwa is DEAD SILENT rn about smackdowns abysmal ratings. but he’ll be all UPPITY come wednesday or friday for AEW’s ratings. what a fucking weak little PUSS. god i hate that guy. really telling when you can dish it and not take it
>>15834945im sorry guys. there was no need to throw that word around. i want to delete this post but its not letting me. please ignore the above post. i apologize.
>>15834945that is racist. whats wrong with you?
>>15828021>he knew
>>15828021wwetty btfo.GODlachlan won.
>>15834945yeah i hate him too but we literally dont use that word here.
