LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>15944903What a kvetching schmuck
>>15944903>magoo wrong again
>>15944903KWAB Fagzer btfo lmao!
>>15944949Is it a bad idea
>>15944903What for?I hate both of these fags
>>15944903What's Dave getting at with the west coast viewers and the football game? The football game is live and not getting delayed or rebroadcast on the west coast like a sitcom so the west coast viewership would be watch live as it's broadcast. I'm not sure if Smackdown is delayed to be broadcast at 8 in the western markets or live at 5, but if it is, that would be affected more by the fast nationals.
>>15944949The finals were much closer than the fasts. He is right.
>>15948300https://www.morganwick.com/sports-tv-ratings-faq/>For primetime sports events and other live events in particular, the fast nationals are completely useless because they count whatever would be in the normal time slot on the West Coast, so a sports event that airs from 8-10 PM ET will have fast nationals including whatever aired on the West Coast at 8-10 PM PT, even though it aired at 5-7 PM PTSo if FOX airs a program on Friday at 8pm that only draws a .2 but the football game earlier drew a .4, then the West Coast markets will drag down the average considerably. But if the 8pm show drew a .35 and football did a .4, it won't have much effectDave as usual chooses to sperg out and not use any sources
>>15944903Fast Nationals come out>DON'T BELIEVE THE FAST NATIONALSActual Ratings come out>Smackdown STILL beats FoxLOL Meltzer is such an old faggot
>>15948470He bitches about tribalism but he's one of the ringleaders with tweets like thisDo you see any mention about a 2nd football game likely to draw more viewers than the FOX game?Nope, because he hadn't pre-prepared that cope ahead of time
>>15948702Ding Ding Ding exactly right
i cant believe there are people on here who spend hours arguing about ratings and how much smarter they are than everyone else when it comes to them.at least these fags on twitter are paid - shills or not.
>>15948718itt, we're calling dave a retard.
>>15948757True. If this thread were filled with actual TV ratings experts, I'd have no issue falling back into a questioner role and trying to learn all I can. Absent that, I'm just here to shit on Meltzer and all the other retards who think they know better but keep fucking up.