Unprecedented.
>>16432870>Subaru Mitsubishi>Fagotori Sukanusu>Fuji Sony PanasonicWow so many superstars from the past I truly didn't know were great performers, thank you!
>>16432870that's odd. why isn't a single WWE wrestler in the top 10? sure the PG children's fed has lots of 5 star matches?
>>16432890We don't do racism here.
>>16432870He overrated Ospreay too much that it became more of a detriment to Ospreay's reputation. You just have to downplay someone with a comical amount of stars like that.
>>16432870the whole 5-star system is such a retarded idea and is fascinating how wrestling fans have bought into it.Can you imagine if all movies were rated by one man with a 5 star system which determined if the movie is good?"Shawshank Redemption? No I won't watch that, Meltzer only gave it 3 stars"
I feel bad that this is going to be the only surviving record of good matches outside of wwe. Future generations are going to watch like one funk match a couple of flairs and then 200 identical osprey matches that aren’t any better than the dragon gate tag they saw earlier.
So is it seen as more impressive if you’re somehow able to get a 5 star match in WWE?
Yet Kenny is still leagues above Ospreay
>>16432870Dave won’t have sex with you for defending your honor bro
>>16432917This board single handedly made me racist against the Irish so you're wrong
A 4+star match means it is worth going out of your way to see it. It only makes since that in an age where you have every match at the tips of your fingers that the requirements for a go out of your way to see match have drastically dropped.
Imagine watching 44 Will Ospreay matchesCouldn't be me
>>16432870>the ratings of a man that reported a wrestler had his brain removed and put back in
>>16432870I would take Dave's stars seriously if he didn't feel compelled to break it multiple to over hype his self inserts
>>16432952>Shawshank RedemptionI agree with the rest of your post but choosing a barely above average movie that normies pretend is some masterpiece because it is/used to be at the top of imdb list, while making an argument about not listening to retarded critics is very ironic
Six million stars and not a single dime.
>>16433082This. Give me some Nights of Cabriria or city lights. I bet this mother fucker loves all the Nolen movies.
>>16433177>Nolen
>>16432870But seriously why would Dave ruin his reputation like this? Over some limey of all things??
>>16432870Up until about 2019 you could really say Dave's ratings were pretty genuine but he went completely awol at a certain point and a number of people cracked his formulaOspreay is not actually that good, on an execution level he's mediocre, he just does lots of things that buzz the autism receptors in Dave's brain
>>16432870every will ospreay match looks the same
>>16432940>He overrated Ospreay too much that it became more of a detriment to Ospreay's reputationUnironically yes, this isn't stated enough that he has lavished him so ridiculously in praise that it creates the idea that he's far and away the best wrestler to ever exist when it's visibly not really the case at all, he's utter leagues beneath guys like prime Kenny and BenoitYou have to start every conversation relating to Ospreay by dismissing Dave as a default
>>16433031This kek, I have not watched more than 4 or 5 of his matches and he sucks. Okada or Omega or Kobashi on the other hand you know that when they are in you should watch them (in their prime and not in AEW)
>>16433819>(in their prime and not in AEW)kek based, aew is only good........................................................to poop on!
>>16433442Nah, Dave has always been unreliable. Maybe not this bad, but he always gave favorable coverage and reviews to guys who stooged to him.
>>16432870Ospreay's moves are very clean and precise, but there are quite a few guys out there that can do the exact same thing.
literally who?
>>16432870It's easy to get a ton of five star matches when you're the favorite wrestler of the guy giving out the star ratings. The fact Ospreay has so many five star matches says more about Meltzer than it does how good Ospreay actually is.
>5-star system>check highest rating>7this doesn't make sense and it triggers my autism. if the match is "over 5 stars" then the system does simply just not work
>>16433985The moment he gave a match a 5.5, he became an unreliable untrustworthy reviewer.
>>16432870I would’ve accepted this if not for the top 3.
And the three of these top guys in the same company at the same time can't draw 7000 people to a show or 700k viewers on TV.
>>16432952Thank God that definitely doesn't exist and nobody has ever rated a movie with stars before.
Why on earth would someone do a wiki about this?
>>16435364EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE RECORDED!
>>16435364He's the only name in town.
>>16433082Shawshank was considered a masterpiece before imdb was even popular you fucking sperg.>well you need to have a very high iq to appreciate the films that I like >oh that well regarded masterpiece? Actually it's quite average, so fooled you have been!Literally kys, you bring no value to the planet with your pseudo intellectual contrarian-posing-as-cultured opinions you utterly worthless twat
>>16433177That goes double for you, cunt
>>16432952This nigga doesn't know how Ebert was.
>>16432952Siskel and Ebert did that. I think Meltzer copied the star system from them.
