If you want to objectively know how good a wrestling match is, all you have to do is consult that week’s edition of The Wrestling Observer Newsletter (WON) and look at the star rating that Dave Meltzer gave it. It is LITERALLY that simple
>>16562852it would be nice if more forms of entertainment had a one stop shop for objective reviews and ratings like wrestling does
>>16562852Isn't listening to the crowd that's watching the match live a more reliable source?
>>16562852That's nonsense.Just go to Cagematch. That's what it's there for. Plus it's free.It's like IMDB for pro-wrestling.
>>16562875the only purpose of Cagematch is to demonstrate that most wrestling fans agree with Dave's (correct) opinion
>>16563247This is true. But Dave doesn't rate everything, and sometimes you need people to tell you whether the match you're watching is good or not.That's where Cagematch comes in. Plus he doesn't rate wrestlers or companies, so it fills that gap as well.
Not listening to the opinions of an ancient kike. Thanks though
>>16562873doesn't work for AEW i'm afraid
>>16563281See, this right here is the other reason we need Cagematch.Who's going to tell this guy whether he's enjoying pro-wrestling the right way or not. He already disregards Dave. He'd be lost without Cagematch.
