Based kev telling the truth
>>16708521What happened in WCW in '92?
>>16708521Wcw was a threat to the wwf from hogans signing in 96 till about the rumble in 98. AEW was a threat ... never? I guess you could 19 or after punk signed but they never eclipsed the fed. Anyway slide on you crippled diamond
>>16708521I believe himBig Kev is very well versed in big threats in 1992
>>16708577not like 92
>>16708577AEW will make WWE KWAB of the year 2025, I'm telling you this right god damn now.
>>16708567wwes jackets are a scam, theyre sized for asians
>>16708713Did you buy a WCW 92 jacket?
GOT MY FIRST REAL SIX STRING
>>16708577why did punk book that?
>>16708577Hogan signed in 94.
>>16708577AEW was a threat to Paul's very life in the Summer of 2021
WCW sucked ass in 1992
>>16708613How exactly? WWE is back in mainstream culture, while AEW is colder than ever. Of course, something might happen that turns things around, but as things stand, AEW will most likely decline even further.
>>16709978PPV buy rates are climbing
>>16710414Source is dave meltzer kek damage control
>>16710414Really? What are the buy rates?
>>16710602175k for Worlds End
>>16711816Nice headcanon
>>16708521Didn't this guy admit to lying about a bunch of shit
>>16708577WCW never turned a profit.
>>16711833Worldwide that is pretty good
>>16708577Hogan signed in 94 not 96
>>16709877It's post punk. Punk only got to book like 11 episodes
>>16711851They actually did, unlike AEW.
>>16711851They were the most profitable wrestling company in history in 1998
>>16708521He's right in the sense that even if AEW got their shit together and started drawing millys again WWE would be nowhere close to ever going out of business, barring some insane scandle 10 times worse than the Vince scandle
>>16712351Not even close to being true.>>16712230They never turned a profit due to the way they offset debts. If you take on 300m of debts in one tax year and make 50m in profit the next year it doesn't offset the debt. They went under because they were losing more year to year.
>>16709971I think that is the point he is making, even awful wcw was in a better position to over take wwf in the ratings than aew has ever or will ever be. Both aew and wwe have streaming customers to adapt to so i mean maybe aew can pull a few viewers this year by altering its shows or wwe could push more fans away by changing to keep netflix numbers growing.
>>16712581Yeah the wcw accounting books are wild, but i think that wcw was able to cover its own costs for a few years while tbs/tnt still got good ad revenue. Im no accountant and im just guessing off of what ive read and heard so im probably wrong on this.
>>16708521kek Nash is the GOAT
>>1670852192?! OH MAN!
>>16708521everybody loves the nash
>>16708521As if I'm gonna take anything this barebacked sissy says seriously lmao
>>16712654>the heckin' ratingserino!Remind me how pursuing only ratings worked out for WCW?
>>16717422well we can see how only caring about bangerinos is faring for Tony KWAB
>>16715925Thanks for posting, Kenny, Go back to fucking Ibushi while calling him Riho the whole time
