[Alarming News] The Dynamite and Collision ratings include Max viewership
>Neilson ratings
nobody gives a shit about ratings you fucking virgin
>>16713340HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>16713340Who is Neil's son?
Welp time from the melty to continue
So that means that no one is watching on Max. It's the same viewership they always get.
DAVE'S GONNA FREAK!
>>16713340grim doesn't even begin to describe it
>>16713371Which is why maybe @rmal13_1 might not be the best source to go off of
Someone get me a SRS story disputing this, stat!
>>16713340Holy GRIMOLA WBD is just THE kwaboty at this point
>>16713392still more credible than meltzer
>>16713340>215 views>4 likesWhy'd you cut that part of? How'd you even find this, rmal?Also from equally as reputable @J706256626116 it's not even true
>>16713411I mean kek true. I could pull information out of my ass that'd be about as reputable as both
>Hey Tony, you still there?
OHHH THE TRANNIES BE BUBBLING!!!Just listened to it, skip to 14:40 on the Friday podcast.
>>16713421>a specific cable boxYeah, 10+ years ago. Most people watching shit on YouTube TV, Hulu, Sling, Fubo etc. likely have Nielsen tracking enabled in their settings by default and don't even realize it.
>>16713442Sure thing Samba tv
>>16713340Dave debunked this yesterday. Sorry Bitchtits!
>>16713448Yes, that too. The difference is Samba doesn't extrapolate its numbers like Nielsen.
>>16713465>Dave saidHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
>>16713465Oh Rovert is coping! Yes he is!!!
>>16713473>>16713483I'm sorry for your loss, Bitchtits.
>>16713465I'm sure this 70 year old autist has better contacts than Austin Karl
>>16713491Rovey is crying this Saturday afternoon (well not sure what time it is in Ireland)
>>16713491>Dave said againHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
>>16713492>>16713506>>16713507Sorry that facts offend you, Bitchtits.
>>16713491>trying to slide in a disingenuous dig at WWE when it had nothing to do with themWhy is he like this?
>>16713518>Dave said for a third timeHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
>>16713518Rovey having a melty!!
>>16713340That doesn't make sense as Max records viewership over multiple days, how can they get the data 24hrs later?
>>16713519>>16713520>>16713527You're embarrassing yourself as per usual, Bitchtits.
>>16713465>>16713491>>16713518Damn Trev already unbanned? You're not ban evading again are ya?
>>16713473Dave said"Um, uh and cough coughI know the real ratings"
The chart literally says it only includes TBS in their timeslot. Why would a separate company throw their data in with NielsonIs this guy retarded?
>>16713532>Dave said for a fourth timeHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
>>16713465Dave already in damage control mode.
>>16713345
>>16713545Still living in 2021, Trev?
>imagine making 4 "Dave said" posts in a threadCOPE and SEETHE aewtist
>>16713536>>16713537>>16713543>>16713544Wow, Bitchtits. This is a new low, even for you!
>>16713532Rovey is melting down I repeat Rovey is MELTING down
>>16713518It doesn't even make sense that the TBS number would include the number from a different service.
>>16713558>Dave said for a fifth timeHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
>>16713557Keep coping fatass.
>>16713559WB owns both
>>16713567Wow, can't even quote the right post, Bitchtits? Yikes!
>>16713579The fat fuck ran out of Dave said LMFAOOOO!!!
>>16713559>why would our failing company include numbers from our television station and our streaming service together. The best thing we can do is make the numbers look low, that's good businessLol that's a neat cope
>>16713557The ratings comeAnd rovert he criesHe types a post and he OINK OINKS
>>16713579Poor Trev tried to hijack the thread but just like his ability to walk he failed.
>>16713465Based. I'mma go with what Big Dave said. He knows more about this shit than anyone else.
You'd think if the MAX numbers were good then Tony and Dave would be gloating up a storm. They could even say the MAX numbers and the cable numbers combined make a milly. Things must be pretty grim if they're so quiet and don't want people to see the MAX numbers.
>>16713340So just as anybody with a brain predicted AEW on Max is a failure but even I didn't expect it to fail quite this hard. Dynamite did only 615k this week so Max viewership must be virtually non-existent. I'm talking somewhere in the ballpark of 5k. Fucking hell, AEW might get cancelled sooner than I thought.
>>16713340HolyFuckingKWABAMOLI!
>>16713465>Meltzer vs actual journalist who knows what he's talking aboutlol Dave is cooked
>>16713465COPE
>>16713621>They could even say the MAX numbers and the cable numbers combined make a milly.Dave already tried doing this and was proven false by a WBD press release the next day. He tried claiming TV ratings + Max streams meant Dynamite did 1.6 million viewers, which was an obvious lie.
hogwheels absolutely melting down in this thread lmfaooink oink trev!!
>>16713554>NOOO YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT RATINGS NOW THAT WE'RE LOSING! JUST ENJOY WRESTLING!!!
>>16713671Why would Dave lie...?
>>16713720If WBD lies people pay fines and go to prison. If Dave lies his subscribers still pay $11.99.
>>16713720Tony pays him to be his cope therapist
>>16713465>>16713491>>16713518>>16713532>>16713557
>>16713749HUGE POP! TRUMP NEVER MISSES!
>>16713340I love how trannies just thought they were gonna double their viewership. Nobody gives a shit about AEWho
>>16713465porktits really didn't like this one
>>16713340That doesnt matter just wait until you see how many new subscibers have flocked to the max streaming platform. Then youll see, then you will see....
>>16713345Rampage was cancelled
>>16713800>As long as I reply to myself I don't have to reply to everyone else making fun of me
>>16713749>this is what you're doing with your life>>16713761>replying to your own postsget a life fatso
>>16713811OH HE'S MADDDDDDDDD!!!
>>16713545LMAOOO BTOF out of the "we never cared about a war" faggots
>>16713491Proof right here that dave is about to blow the cover on wwe and their bot army! Wwe is so desperate for numbers that they literally buy homeless people tvs and netflix subscriptions just to pad the numbers. Truly grim.
>>16713769Trannies think slapping Swineamite and Baconllision onto a streaming service will grow the audience. It's still a niche product thats too heavily influenced by "Hey remember then this match happened at Wrestle Kingdom???"
>>16713557So wait, max numbers count but then they dont unless they do? Dave is amazing.
>>16713491>these other ones weren't included in numbers so this one isn't EITHER!
>>16713340Dear oh dear
The funny thing is Dave is right and I don't think Max is included but just to make a certain cripple seethe is worth playing along.
>>16713809just because you're as fat as several people does not make you "everyone else"
>>16713624No, the max numbers are great and youll see that tonight live on the great streaming platform max! Max is great name, kinda like the great wrestler mox, but diffrent. Which is great, its great to be diffrent. And aew has a great new and diffrent episode on a great night like tonight on a great platform like max!
>>16713421>I-it's a specific cable box!!!Yeah I'm sure Neilson hasn't changed their methodology or started partnerships with other data sources/brokers since the 1980s.
>>16713874>I'm not the one samefagging you areSorry Trev. The only fat fuck here is you. Want proof? Here ya go! >>16706530
>>16713867Isn't it great watching him meltdown?
>>16713371>>16713392Or the people who are watching on Max are the same ones who were watching on tv. They just changed where they watch it.
>>16713938Why would you watch on a platform that's a minute or more behind?
>>16713363KEK what a god damn mess
>>16713518But wait, there's more!
>>16713891>look at this AI generated image I made, it's definitely proof of... somethingthe only thing it's proof of is your incredible mental illness, fatso
>>16713966I wish I made it. I would love to take credit for something that makes you seethe so much. What a confirmed fat fuck you are KWAB
>>16713989everything about you is pathetic
>>16713944It's cheaper
>>16713998You're so mad that everyone knows you're really fat and crippled lol.
>>16714005nah that's you
>>16713340This is the latest piggie cope? How bad did the 664k mindfuck you all?
>>16713671this never happened btw
>>16713572And?
>>16713584TBS has it's own half baked streaming service, Max is a different service. Nielsen literally records the number as TBS on a timeslot.
>>16713371well of course, would you watch this shit??it's the same people but now they can choose tv or max
>>16713340Davetty SmellXir didn’t like this one lmao.
>>16713340KWAB LMAO!
>>16713340OH NO NO NO AHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
>>16713340OHNONONONONO
>>16713536>bannedSchizos never get banned on /pw/. They need to be THOURGHOULY exposed like a dox or something, and it has to happen on /pw/.
>>16713340GRIM.
>>16714541IDs would solve every single problem on this board in five minutes flat.
>>16714660We'll never have IDs. Jannies don't want people to know /pw/ is literally just me.
>>16713340Ah so this is why the AEW Discordfags are melting down
>>16713340DyingPissantCompany
>>16714703KWADPC
>>16713340KEK
>>16714744So true. Many saying it.
>>16713340bump so i can continue to laugh at aew
>>16713527Must be a day that ends in y lmaoooo
>>16713621Yeah he had said that the streamers release their numbers publicly if they’re good numbers. Then when Max declines to release the dynamite numbers he refuses to connect the dots.
>>16713938This. Being on Max isn't drawing them any new fans. It's just the same people watching. This is what happens when you book for a small percentile of a fan base.
AEW? More like embarrassing fed for pedophiles on Discord
>>16715793Everyone is saying this
>>16715793kek
>>16713371>So that means that no one is watching on Max. It's the same viewership they always get.That's correct.Why would any current AEW fans who pay for TBS, buy a subscription to MAX? It logically makes ZERO sense. AEW IS DEAD.
>Starting the week of 30-May-2022, Nielsen officially started including HBO Max
>>16713340So this is where hogwheels has been melting down today?
>random Twitter nobodyJust do it. Your life's never getting better.>>16713344fpbp
>>16713421lmao edrones coping so bad they're using literal who twitter accounts as their evidence
you know this is true because if the max number was impressive, Tony and meltzer wouldn't be shutting the fuck up about it.
>>16713532Who the fuck has Max? They'd be lucky to get 20k extra viewers through Max and I'm being generous
>>16713557you know that meltzer doesn't know shit, right?
>>16718825I just don't understand how AEW on MAX would gain any new subscribers to the app.It's been around 5+ years (AEW) and everybody who watches, the relatively small few, all have their access set up. Cable, pirating, etc.
>>16718960aew doesn't get new viewers anywhere anon it just loses viewers
>>16718542
