>>16760634Nah too late. I used to say that TNA was, without hyperbole, better as WWE Network content and WWE.com articles like "10 WWE Superstars you didn't know were in TNA" than continuing to beat a dead horse.But guess what? The network is gone and it isn't the mid-2010s anymore where you could even make such an article. That ship has sailed.
Probably wasn't worth what TNA wanted. The only reason to buy them is for the video library and there's really no reason for them to do the deal now, even if it would have been pocket change for TKO. If the Network was still a thing, absolutely. And they'll end up with it eventually anyway.
