https://s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod/interactives/233_reading_the_mind_through_eyes/Launch.htmlHow do you score?
>>77247348How did I do? Am I good monkey?
>>77247348Interesting read, have a bump
>>77247416ooking and eeking well within optimal operating range
I am an autistic male
>>77247416Also got 26.Some were kind of weird though.
>>77247348I got 30, but noticed if i had to do it without multiple choice deduction available i probably wouldve got 10 or lower
imagine saying this to someone and they reply with a non realist answer
>>77247570Me, I, am you.
31/36. thought the flirty / desire faces were anger / fear. it's over.
>>77247348got 23. its easier for me to differentiate between positive emotions then more negative ones, especially in regards to multiple choice, also im not a native english speaker, so sometimes i just chose words that i dont know, as they seemed too extravagant to be a random choice, worked i think every single time (twice) ahaha, guess i got lucky in that regard
>>77247348These tests are bullshit because identifiying the emotional state displayed on static images of faces is unrelated to our ability to recognize and respond to nonverbal expressions in real time social interaction, since there is no pause button.
>>7724734825/36, but a handful for me were a tossup between the wrong answer i picked and my second choice which ended up being right.
>>77247768Cope, the test asked you to answer as quickly as possible. I got 34/36 answering within 5 seconds of the image loading, some of the meanings were pretty close. For example one I got wrong was thinking distrustful was anger or something like that.Also a normie, so ig that helps
>>77247516I wonder if we got the same images right and wrong
>>77247348I wouldn't say I did too bad considering the only facial expression we're going by are cropped out eyes.>two identical threads
>15bad imagesi can actually read faces
>13/36is it over for me? or is the test bs
>>77248363I'm ngl a score <34 indicates down's syndrome with each decrement of 2 placing you on the higher end of severity.
>>7724734811/36 how over is it I've given up actually knowing how people feel and have been guessing for years
is it all in the eyes?
>>77247416I'm the same monky as you are
>>77247768Also the pictures are what the quiz setter assumed. I would get 100% in the real world.
>>77248363This one guy I used to know kept mistaking playful with angry. He was a bit of a psycho.
>>77247348I got like low 20s when I took this test as a sperg. feels good to be high iq.
stealth autism test
>>7724734821 this time, not a bad improvement over when I last took it over a decade ago and scored 18.
>>7724734827/36 diagnosed autist.
taking advantage of low scor.g anns
>>77247348I literally don't know
>>77247348Did better than I thought I would>>77252064>anon literally doesn't know what a look of desire looks likeThe state of young men ;_;
>>77252064I think desire is the obvious answer
>>77252123>>77252138she looks annoyed and sarcastic to me
This test just taught me that all those times I thought a girl was looking at me with desire was actually right and I'm not actually delusional like I try to convince myselfWhen a girl looks at me like that my body enters high alert and I have to get away from her ASAP
>>77247348>26/36on most of the ones I got wrong I misconstrued interest with hostility. In my head any expression with eyes on you and head tilted downwards is aggressive.>>77252064>>77252157I also thought she looked annoyed, if this wasn't multiple choice I reckon I would have done much worse.It's strange though - I always figured it was the mouth that more distinguished if an emotion was positive or negative?
>>77252138inb4 'no woman has EVER looked at me like this how was i supposed to know ;;'
>>77248403You are not funny, kys
>>77252500I scored 36/36. wbu?
erm bros i think it's over or the test is retarded
its more of an empathy test
>>77247348They obviously want you to think about it in a certain way. The thing is people that know facial expressions also know how to hide them or have long(subconciously) learned not to express things in certain ways.Just because some thing's written in a book doesn't make it true. A facial expression doesn't necessarily mean they're in a certain state of mind or having a certain thought.
>>77252064This is literally just Adriana Lima's neutral facial expression.
>>77247348I feel like half the pictures could be interpreted in many ways, i guess it depends on context
I noticed I had more trouble with women's eyes. I think I lack experience with their facial expressions, or I subconsciously assume women are dishonest or deceitful.I got 25
>>77247348If body language is real. Why do actors and movies exist? "Oh that's different. That's just an exception". How many exceptions are allowed?
>>77247348normalDEITY>>77253287>>77248363based
>>77252157>childhood trauma is also associated with differences in recognising others' emotions; however, these are not uniform. The effects of childhood trauma on emotion classification accuracy are dependent on the emotional valence of the face; accuracy is higher for negative emotions and poorer for positive or neutral emotions, which are often misclassified as negative
>>77247348I mog you all
Everyone acts fake in the presence of a camera. This test doesn't work unless the photos are candid.
>>77255599sure it does. most of these have an obvious answer that most people would agree upon, whether it's a genuine expression or not, reading it the same way other people would means you're normal. the only issue is that it's culturally loaded, but from what I've seen it still works well enough. it's almost certainly more accurate than a personality test albeit maybe less than an IQ test.
>>77247348I need more clues. Only the eyes is not enough to produce good results.