i do not want to be in a relationship with someone who can't break up face to face. i want it to be like a movie with an emotional climax and a beautiful bittersweet setting.the insistence of doing everything on the phone is indicative of a paradigm that seeks to mechanicalize love and the romantic spirit. it is utterly oppressive and it robs the soul ofa transformative closure. i refuse to entertain someone who would so such a thing.where do I find people who aren't oversocialized in such a manner?
>>78005898If I was a girl I would wanna break up with you anon.
>>78005898>t. fembraink, cool
>the insistence of doing everything on the phone is indicative of a paradigm that seeks to mechanicalize love and the romantic spiritTruth
There is no "insistence", you insufferable midheart --except by the elites who benefit massively from you thinking you're better, wiser, stronger, realer than other people by coping with being forced into [cultural paradigm] by withdrawing FURTHER and involving yourself LESS in any change or betterment on account of juvenile escapist fantasies and pseudophilosophical copes. True Love is not a juvenile escapist fantasy, but seeking it by this route and carrying yourself this way while in pursuit will keep you trapped in tidepools and dredgeloops. If you are lucky enough to find someone with the same values and virtues as you in person, Godspeed. But don't pretend "people who communicate/court electronically" are entirely synonymous with "people who would be soulless enough to break up with you electronically whether you are long-distance or had seen eachother every day of your lives since you started dating". Your own lack of discernment will bite you in the ass and you will alienate yourself from others and others from yourself. There is also a difference between that and GOD setting *you Apart, delivering you from evil.Take care.
>>78005898Ok. Granted. This is my tripcode. It's easy to guess, but who in their rightful mind would put so much effort and waste so much time just for that..?Sorry, no drama for you. It's just it. If you want drama, go watch Korean TV shows."I'm breaking up with you" and this is my final message.There you have it, now you can have your abandonment anxiety and seek out an upgrade bf. Best of luck.
>>78006407You are sophomoric in the worst way. Some of you SHOULD actually think twice when the jocks tell you to stop using big words you don't know the meaning of just for emotional impact. And anyone should think multiple times about concurring with such an unrefined "ideal". Again, there is no "insistence". Our world has changed and you are far more likely to end up in poverty or remain impoverished if you don't have, say, a home internet connection or a smart phone, for chrissakes. *Literally* I mean below the poverty line, to say nothing of romantic or spiritual starvation. The inability for THE COLLECTIVE, THE MAJORITY,THE PEOPLE WHOM THIS SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT NO LONGER REPRESENTS; NOT ONLY THAT, BUT OVERTLY OPPRESSES AND EXPLOITS, to emancipate themselves from the algorithmic menace.. shows just how corrupt the governing and truly (((Influential))) parties are. Put. Your anger. In a righteous. Place.Scattering to the forest with all the Love in the world won't do anything meaningful if we die a slow, lonely, friendly-fire, fading-out kind of death before they even come to raze our camps. The paradigm does not speak for the Sovereign. The paradigm incriminates the powers that be in having tried to toss a fire blanket over the birth of a new Sun.
>>78006650This post is chris-chan tier autism
>>78006650i'm not angry just killing time and expressin myself
>>78005898>mechanicalize loveBeautiful wording anon, and now go back to /lit/
Romcoms have done as much damage to women as porn has done to men.
